P16 Immunohistochemistry Interpretation by Nonpathologists as an Accurate Method for Diagnosing Cervical Precancer and Cancer

Guang Dong Liao, Le Ni Kang, Wen Chen, Xun Zhang, Xiao Yang Liu, Fang Hui Zhao, Mark H. Stoler, Anne Mills, Ming Rong Xi, You Lin Qiao, Philip E. Castle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We conducted a pilot study of whether nonpathologists could accurately diagnose cervical precancer in biopsies using only a basic light microscope, evaluating p16INK4a immunohistochemistry (p16 IHC) of biopsies, and video-based training for both. Materials and Methods: Using biopsies collected as part of a screening study conducted in rural China, we randomly selected 50 biopsies with a precancerous diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or more severe (CIN2+) and 50 biopsies with diagnosis of CIN less severe than CIN2, and stained them for p16 using a commercial IHC kit. Twelve nonpathologists of varying educational backgrounds living in Beijing, China received video training and were assigned one of 4 sets of 25 CIN2+ and 25 CIN less severe than CIN2 for evaluation. A pathologist reviewed all 100 cases. Results: The mean sensitivity and specificity of the p16 IHC staining scored by the nonpathologists were 91.7% and 94.1%, respectively, compared to scoring by the pathologist. The readers and the pathologist agreed on p16 IHC scoring for 42 (84%) of the 50 slides of CIN less severe than CIN2 and 37 (74%) of the 50 CIN2+ slides. The mean sensitivity and specificity for consensus CIN2+ of p16 IHC as scored by the readers were 88% and 87%, respectively, versus an overall sensitivity and specificity by the pathologist of 96% and 92%, respectively. Conclusions We demonstrated that nonpathologists can accurately diagnose CIN2+ using p16 IHC alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-211
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 26 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Immunohistochemistry
Biopsy
Sensitivity and Specificity
China
Staining and Labeling
Light
Pathologists

Keywords

  • cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
  • human papillomavirus
  • immunohistochemistry
  • p16<sup>INK4a</sup>
  • Pap
  • VIA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

P16 Immunohistochemistry Interpretation by Nonpathologists as an Accurate Method for Diagnosing Cervical Precancer and Cancer. / Liao, Guang Dong; Kang, Le Ni; Chen, Wen; Zhang, Xun; Liu, Xiao Yang; Zhao, Fang Hui; Stoler, Mark H.; Mills, Anne; Xi, Ming Rong; Qiao, You Lin; Castle, Philip E.

In: Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, Vol. 19, No. 3, 26.07.2015, p. 207-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liao, Guang Dong ; Kang, Le Ni ; Chen, Wen ; Zhang, Xun ; Liu, Xiao Yang ; Zhao, Fang Hui ; Stoler, Mark H. ; Mills, Anne ; Xi, Ming Rong ; Qiao, You Lin ; Castle, Philip E. / P16 Immunohistochemistry Interpretation by Nonpathologists as an Accurate Method for Diagnosing Cervical Precancer and Cancer. In: Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 2015 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 207-211.
@article{9e4e95df4edf4d879654cdbd1ef3ca36,
title = "P16 Immunohistochemistry Interpretation by Nonpathologists as an Accurate Method for Diagnosing Cervical Precancer and Cancer",
abstract = "Objective: We conducted a pilot study of whether nonpathologists could accurately diagnose cervical precancer in biopsies using only a basic light microscope, evaluating p16INK4a immunohistochemistry (p16 IHC) of biopsies, and video-based training for both. Materials and Methods: Using biopsies collected as part of a screening study conducted in rural China, we randomly selected 50 biopsies with a precancerous diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or more severe (CIN2+) and 50 biopsies with diagnosis of CIN less severe than CIN2, and stained them for p16 using a commercial IHC kit. Twelve nonpathologists of varying educational backgrounds living in Beijing, China received video training and were assigned one of 4 sets of 25 CIN2+ and 25 CIN less severe than CIN2 for evaluation. A pathologist reviewed all 100 cases. Results: The mean sensitivity and specificity of the p16 IHC staining scored by the nonpathologists were 91.7{\%} and 94.1{\%}, respectively, compared to scoring by the pathologist. The readers and the pathologist agreed on p16 IHC scoring for 42 (84{\%}) of the 50 slides of CIN less severe than CIN2 and 37 (74{\%}) of the 50 CIN2+ slides. The mean sensitivity and specificity for consensus CIN2+ of p16 IHC as scored by the readers were 88{\%} and 87{\%}, respectively, versus an overall sensitivity and specificity by the pathologist of 96{\%} and 92{\%}, respectively. Conclusions We demonstrated that nonpathologists can accurately diagnose CIN2+ using p16 IHC alone.",
keywords = "cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, human papillomavirus, immunohistochemistry, p16<sup>INK4a</sup>, Pap, VIA",
author = "Liao, {Guang Dong} and Kang, {Le Ni} and Wen Chen and Xun Zhang and Liu, {Xiao Yang} and Zhao, {Fang Hui} and Stoler, {Mark H.} and Anne Mills and Xi, {Ming Rong} and Qiao, {You Lin} and Castle, {Philip E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1097/LGT.0000000000000080",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "207--211",
journal = "Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease",
issn = "1089-2591",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - P16 Immunohistochemistry Interpretation by Nonpathologists as an Accurate Method for Diagnosing Cervical Precancer and Cancer

AU - Liao, Guang Dong

AU - Kang, Le Ni

AU - Chen, Wen

AU - Zhang, Xun

AU - Liu, Xiao Yang

AU - Zhao, Fang Hui

AU - Stoler, Mark H.

AU - Mills, Anne

AU - Xi, Ming Rong

AU - Qiao, You Lin

AU - Castle, Philip E.

PY - 2015/7/26

Y1 - 2015/7/26

N2 - Objective: We conducted a pilot study of whether nonpathologists could accurately diagnose cervical precancer in biopsies using only a basic light microscope, evaluating p16INK4a immunohistochemistry (p16 IHC) of biopsies, and video-based training for both. Materials and Methods: Using biopsies collected as part of a screening study conducted in rural China, we randomly selected 50 biopsies with a precancerous diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or more severe (CIN2+) and 50 biopsies with diagnosis of CIN less severe than CIN2, and stained them for p16 using a commercial IHC kit. Twelve nonpathologists of varying educational backgrounds living in Beijing, China received video training and were assigned one of 4 sets of 25 CIN2+ and 25 CIN less severe than CIN2 for evaluation. A pathologist reviewed all 100 cases. Results: The mean sensitivity and specificity of the p16 IHC staining scored by the nonpathologists were 91.7% and 94.1%, respectively, compared to scoring by the pathologist. The readers and the pathologist agreed on p16 IHC scoring for 42 (84%) of the 50 slides of CIN less severe than CIN2 and 37 (74%) of the 50 CIN2+ slides. The mean sensitivity and specificity for consensus CIN2+ of p16 IHC as scored by the readers were 88% and 87%, respectively, versus an overall sensitivity and specificity by the pathologist of 96% and 92%, respectively. Conclusions We demonstrated that nonpathologists can accurately diagnose CIN2+ using p16 IHC alone.

AB - Objective: We conducted a pilot study of whether nonpathologists could accurately diagnose cervical precancer in biopsies using only a basic light microscope, evaluating p16INK4a immunohistochemistry (p16 IHC) of biopsies, and video-based training for both. Materials and Methods: Using biopsies collected as part of a screening study conducted in rural China, we randomly selected 50 biopsies with a precancerous diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or more severe (CIN2+) and 50 biopsies with diagnosis of CIN less severe than CIN2, and stained them for p16 using a commercial IHC kit. Twelve nonpathologists of varying educational backgrounds living in Beijing, China received video training and were assigned one of 4 sets of 25 CIN2+ and 25 CIN less severe than CIN2 for evaluation. A pathologist reviewed all 100 cases. Results: The mean sensitivity and specificity of the p16 IHC staining scored by the nonpathologists were 91.7% and 94.1%, respectively, compared to scoring by the pathologist. The readers and the pathologist agreed on p16 IHC scoring for 42 (84%) of the 50 slides of CIN less severe than CIN2 and 37 (74%) of the 50 CIN2+ slides. The mean sensitivity and specificity for consensus CIN2+ of p16 IHC as scored by the readers were 88% and 87%, respectively, versus an overall sensitivity and specificity by the pathologist of 96% and 92%, respectively. Conclusions We demonstrated that nonpathologists can accurately diagnose CIN2+ using p16 IHC alone.

KW - cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

KW - human papillomavirus

KW - immunohistochemistry

KW - p16<sup>INK4a</sup>

KW - Pap

KW - VIA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937710891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937710891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000080

DO - 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000080

M3 - Article

C2 - 25171105

AN - SCOPUS:84937710891

VL - 19

SP - 207

EP - 211

JO - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

JF - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

SN - 1089-2591

IS - 3

ER -