Overcoming the steep learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Single-surgeon experience

Reza Ghavamian, Gregory Schenk, David M. Hoenig, Pierre Williot, Arnold Melman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of intensive laparoscopic skills training and self-critical video review on the learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Patients and Methods: The initial 40 patients who underwent a transperitoneal LRP (groups 1-4) and the subsequent 20 who underwent LRP by the extraperitoneal approach (group 5) were studied. Eight weeks prior to initiating the LRP program, intensive laparoscopic skills training at a minimally invasive surgery center was undertaken for an average of 4, hours per week. This self-training was continued for 12 weeks into the program, with self-critical review of videotapes of each procedure. The groups were compared with respect to total operative time (ORT), anastomosis time, and blood loss. Results: There were significant differences in the ORT and anastomosis times between each of the first two groups and the last two groups (P < 0.001). The learning curve for ORT was overcome after approximately 35 cases, as there were no significant differences in ORT between group 3 and the subsequent groups. The anastomosis took longer to master, as significant time decreases were observed up to group 4, after which, the mean reached a plateau (group 4 v 5 P = NS). The differences in blood loss were not significant. Overall, there were 7 intraoperative (12.7%) and 8 postoperative (14.5%) complications. Conclusions: The use of similar facilities and training tools can help overcome the steep learning curve of LRP. Longer follow-up is needed to assess these means of attaining better functional results after LRP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)567-571
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004

Fingerprint

Learning Curve
Prostatectomy
Operative Time
Videotape Recording
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Overcoming the steep learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : Single-surgeon experience. / Ghavamian, Reza; Schenk, Gregory; Hoenig, David M.; Williot, Pierre; Melman, Arnold.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 18, No. 6, 08.2004, p. 567-571.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ghavamian, Reza ; Schenk, Gregory ; Hoenig, David M. ; Williot, Pierre ; Melman, Arnold. / Overcoming the steep learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : Single-surgeon experience. In: Journal of Endourology. 2004 ; Vol. 18, No. 6. pp. 567-571.
@article{a5b566d2684b475fb255185d18146b63,
title = "Overcoming the steep learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Single-surgeon experience",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the influence of intensive laparoscopic skills training and self-critical video review on the learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Patients and Methods: The initial 40 patients who underwent a transperitoneal LRP (groups 1-4) and the subsequent 20 who underwent LRP by the extraperitoneal approach (group 5) were studied. Eight weeks prior to initiating the LRP program, intensive laparoscopic skills training at a minimally invasive surgery center was undertaken for an average of 4, hours per week. This self-training was continued for 12 weeks into the program, with self-critical review of videotapes of each procedure. The groups were compared with respect to total operative time (ORT), anastomosis time, and blood loss. Results: There were significant differences in the ORT and anastomosis times between each of the first two groups and the last two groups (P < 0.001). The learning curve for ORT was overcome after approximately 35 cases, as there were no significant differences in ORT between group 3 and the subsequent groups. The anastomosis took longer to master, as significant time decreases were observed up to group 4, after which, the mean reached a plateau (group 4 v 5 P = NS). The differences in blood loss were not significant. Overall, there were 7 intraoperative (12.7{\%}) and 8 postoperative (14.5{\%}) complications. Conclusions: The use of similar facilities and training tools can help overcome the steep learning curve of LRP. Longer follow-up is needed to assess these means of attaining better functional results after LRP.",
author = "Reza Ghavamian and Gregory Schenk and Hoenig, {David M.} and Pierre Williot and Arnold Melman",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1089/end.2004.18.567",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "567--571",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overcoming the steep learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

T2 - Single-surgeon experience

AU - Ghavamian, Reza

AU - Schenk, Gregory

AU - Hoenig, David M.

AU - Williot, Pierre

AU - Melman, Arnold

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the influence of intensive laparoscopic skills training and self-critical video review on the learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Patients and Methods: The initial 40 patients who underwent a transperitoneal LRP (groups 1-4) and the subsequent 20 who underwent LRP by the extraperitoneal approach (group 5) were studied. Eight weeks prior to initiating the LRP program, intensive laparoscopic skills training at a minimally invasive surgery center was undertaken for an average of 4, hours per week. This self-training was continued for 12 weeks into the program, with self-critical review of videotapes of each procedure. The groups were compared with respect to total operative time (ORT), anastomosis time, and blood loss. Results: There were significant differences in the ORT and anastomosis times between each of the first two groups and the last two groups (P < 0.001). The learning curve for ORT was overcome after approximately 35 cases, as there were no significant differences in ORT between group 3 and the subsequent groups. The anastomosis took longer to master, as significant time decreases were observed up to group 4, after which, the mean reached a plateau (group 4 v 5 P = NS). The differences in blood loss were not significant. Overall, there were 7 intraoperative (12.7%) and 8 postoperative (14.5%) complications. Conclusions: The use of similar facilities and training tools can help overcome the steep learning curve of LRP. Longer follow-up is needed to assess these means of attaining better functional results after LRP.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the influence of intensive laparoscopic skills training and self-critical video review on the learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Patients and Methods: The initial 40 patients who underwent a transperitoneal LRP (groups 1-4) and the subsequent 20 who underwent LRP by the extraperitoneal approach (group 5) were studied. Eight weeks prior to initiating the LRP program, intensive laparoscopic skills training at a minimally invasive surgery center was undertaken for an average of 4, hours per week. This self-training was continued for 12 weeks into the program, with self-critical review of videotapes of each procedure. The groups were compared with respect to total operative time (ORT), anastomosis time, and blood loss. Results: There were significant differences in the ORT and anastomosis times between each of the first two groups and the last two groups (P < 0.001). The learning curve for ORT was overcome after approximately 35 cases, as there were no significant differences in ORT between group 3 and the subsequent groups. The anastomosis took longer to master, as significant time decreases were observed up to group 4, after which, the mean reached a plateau (group 4 v 5 P = NS). The differences in blood loss were not significant. Overall, there were 7 intraoperative (12.7%) and 8 postoperative (14.5%) complications. Conclusions: The use of similar facilities and training tools can help overcome the steep learning curve of LRP. Longer follow-up is needed to assess these means of attaining better functional results after LRP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344710066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4344710066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2004.18.567

DO - 10.1089/end.2004.18.567

M3 - Article

C2 - 15333224

AN - SCOPUS:4344710066

VL - 18

SP - 567

EP - 571

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 6

ER -