Otolaryngology resident selection

Do rank lists matter?

John P. Bent, Patrick M. Colley, Gerald D. Zahtz, Richard V. Smith, Sanjay R. Parikh, Bradley A. Schiff, Marvin P. Fried

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To examine the relationship between National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) rank list position and future otolaryngology residency performance. Study Design. Cohort study. Methods. Eight consecutive residency classes (starting 2001-2008; 4 residents/y) were reviewed. Three hundred and thirty-three applicants (40.6 applicants/y) were interviewed, and 316 (94.9%) were ranked. Residents matching with our program were divided 3 different ways: into quarters, thirds, and halves, based on their rank order. Correlation coefficients were obtained to compare resident rank number and rank group (quarter, third, half) to faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, and in-service score. Chi-square tests were conducted comparing rank group to chief resident selection and annual teaching award. Results. Resident NRMP rank number was not significantly correlated with faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, or in-service exam score (-0.21 < r < 0.05; P > .28). There was also no significant correlation between resident quarter, third, or half rank group and faculty evaluation; coresident evaluation; or in-service exam score (-0.29 < r < 0.10; P > .13). Chi-square analysis found no relationship between resident rank group and chief resident (P > .35) or teaching award (P > .13) selection. Conclusions. Applicant rank number and rank group did not correlate with performance of this otolaryngology residency cohort as assessed by faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, in-service exam score, or selection for chief resident or the annual teaching award. Resident selection committees should consider reallocating manpower hours from creating rank order to recruiting applicants and selecting interview candidates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)537-541
Number of pages5
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume144
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Otolaryngology
Internship and Residency
Teaching
Chi-Square Distribution
Cohort Studies
Interviews

Keywords

  • Rank lists
  • Resident selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Otolaryngology resident selection : Do rank lists matter? / Bent, John P.; Colley, Patrick M.; Zahtz, Gerald D.; Smith, Richard V.; Parikh, Sanjay R.; Schiff, Bradley A.; Fried, Marvin P.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 144, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 537-541.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{26bff6f855d7499485442064f5c89ca9,
title = "Otolaryngology resident selection: Do rank lists matter?",
abstract = "Objectives. To examine the relationship between National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) rank list position and future otolaryngology residency performance. Study Design. Cohort study. Methods. Eight consecutive residency classes (starting 2001-2008; 4 residents/y) were reviewed. Three hundred and thirty-three applicants (40.6 applicants/y) were interviewed, and 316 (94.9{\%}) were ranked. Residents matching with our program were divided 3 different ways: into quarters, thirds, and halves, based on their rank order. Correlation coefficients were obtained to compare resident rank number and rank group (quarter, third, half) to faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, and in-service score. Chi-square tests were conducted comparing rank group to chief resident selection and annual teaching award. Results. Resident NRMP rank number was not significantly correlated with faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, or in-service exam score (-0.21 < r < 0.05; P > .28). There was also no significant correlation between resident quarter, third, or half rank group and faculty evaluation; coresident evaluation; or in-service exam score (-0.29 < r < 0.10; P > .13). Chi-square analysis found no relationship between resident rank group and chief resident (P > .35) or teaching award (P > .13) selection. Conclusions. Applicant rank number and rank group did not correlate with performance of this otolaryngology residency cohort as assessed by faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, in-service exam score, or selection for chief resident or the annual teaching award. Resident selection committees should consider reallocating manpower hours from creating rank order to recruiting applicants and selecting interview candidates.",
keywords = "Rank lists, Resident selection",
author = "Bent, {John P.} and Colley, {Patrick M.} and Zahtz, {Gerald D.} and Smith, {Richard V.} and Parikh, {Sanjay R.} and Schiff, {Bradley A.} and Fried, {Marvin P.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/0194599810396604",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "537--541",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Otolaryngology resident selection

T2 - Do rank lists matter?

AU - Bent, John P.

AU - Colley, Patrick M.

AU - Zahtz, Gerald D.

AU - Smith, Richard V.

AU - Parikh, Sanjay R.

AU - Schiff, Bradley A.

AU - Fried, Marvin P.

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Objectives. To examine the relationship between National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) rank list position and future otolaryngology residency performance. Study Design. Cohort study. Methods. Eight consecutive residency classes (starting 2001-2008; 4 residents/y) were reviewed. Three hundred and thirty-three applicants (40.6 applicants/y) were interviewed, and 316 (94.9%) were ranked. Residents matching with our program were divided 3 different ways: into quarters, thirds, and halves, based on their rank order. Correlation coefficients were obtained to compare resident rank number and rank group (quarter, third, half) to faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, and in-service score. Chi-square tests were conducted comparing rank group to chief resident selection and annual teaching award. Results. Resident NRMP rank number was not significantly correlated with faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, or in-service exam score (-0.21 < r < 0.05; P > .28). There was also no significant correlation between resident quarter, third, or half rank group and faculty evaluation; coresident evaluation; or in-service exam score (-0.29 < r < 0.10; P > .13). Chi-square analysis found no relationship between resident rank group and chief resident (P > .35) or teaching award (P > .13) selection. Conclusions. Applicant rank number and rank group did not correlate with performance of this otolaryngology residency cohort as assessed by faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, in-service exam score, or selection for chief resident or the annual teaching award. Resident selection committees should consider reallocating manpower hours from creating rank order to recruiting applicants and selecting interview candidates.

AB - Objectives. To examine the relationship between National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) rank list position and future otolaryngology residency performance. Study Design. Cohort study. Methods. Eight consecutive residency classes (starting 2001-2008; 4 residents/y) were reviewed. Three hundred and thirty-three applicants (40.6 applicants/y) were interviewed, and 316 (94.9%) were ranked. Residents matching with our program were divided 3 different ways: into quarters, thirds, and halves, based on their rank order. Correlation coefficients were obtained to compare resident rank number and rank group (quarter, third, half) to faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, and in-service score. Chi-square tests were conducted comparing rank group to chief resident selection and annual teaching award. Results. Resident NRMP rank number was not significantly correlated with faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, or in-service exam score (-0.21 < r < 0.05; P > .28). There was also no significant correlation between resident quarter, third, or half rank group and faculty evaluation; coresident evaluation; or in-service exam score (-0.29 < r < 0.10; P > .13). Chi-square analysis found no relationship between resident rank group and chief resident (P > .35) or teaching award (P > .13) selection. Conclusions. Applicant rank number and rank group did not correlate with performance of this otolaryngology residency cohort as assessed by faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, in-service exam score, or selection for chief resident or the annual teaching award. Resident selection committees should consider reallocating manpower hours from creating rank order to recruiting applicants and selecting interview candidates.

KW - Rank lists

KW - Resident selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863359717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863359717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0194599810396604

DO - 10.1177/0194599810396604

M3 - Article

VL - 144

SP - 537

EP - 541

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 4

ER -