Optimizing cryopreservation of human spermatogonial stem cells: Comparing the effectiveness of testicular tissue and single cell suspension cryopreservation

Pamela Yango, Eran Altman, James F. Smith, Peter C. Klatsky, Nam D. Tran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether optimal human spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) cryopreservation is best achieved with testicular tissue or single cell suspension cryopreservation. This study compares the effectiveness between these two approaches by using testicular SSEA-4+ cells, a known population containing SSCs. Design: In vitro human testicular tissues. Setting: Academic research unit. Patient(s): Adult testicular tissues (n = 4) collected from subjects with normal spermatogenesis and normal fetal testicular tissues (n = 3). Intervention(s): Testicular tissue versus single cell suspension cryopreservation. Main Outcome Measure(s): Cell viability, total cell recovery per milligram of tissue, as well as viable and SSEA-4+ cell recovery. Result(s): Single cell suspension cryopreservation yielded higher recovery of SSEA-4+ cells enriched in adult SSCs, whereas fetal SSEA-4+ cell recovery was similar between testicular tissue and single cell suspension cryopreservation. Conclusion(s): Adult and fetal human SSEA-4+ populations exhibited differential sensitivity to cryopreservation based on whether they were cryopreserved in situ as testicular tissues or as single cells. Thus, optimal preservation of human SSCs depends on the patient's age, type of samples cryopreserved, and end points of therapeutic applications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1491-1498
Number of pages8
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume102
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Cryopreservation
Suspensions
Stem Cells
Spermatogenesis
Population
Cell Survival
Fetus
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
stage-specific embryonic antigen-4

Keywords

  • Spermatogonial stem cells
  • Testicular cell cryopreservation
  • Testicular tissue cryopreservation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Optimizing cryopreservation of human spermatogonial stem cells : Comparing the effectiveness of testicular tissue and single cell suspension cryopreservation. / Yango, Pamela; Altman, Eran; Smith, James F.; Klatsky, Peter C.; Tran, Nam D.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 102, No. 5, 2014, p. 1491-1498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yango, Pamela ; Altman, Eran ; Smith, James F. ; Klatsky, Peter C. ; Tran, Nam D. / Optimizing cryopreservation of human spermatogonial stem cells : Comparing the effectiveness of testicular tissue and single cell suspension cryopreservation. In: Fertility and Sterility. 2014 ; Vol. 102, No. 5. pp. 1491-1498.
@article{d0ff07b7e30d443ea46e7bd54be50d91,
title = "Optimizing cryopreservation of human spermatogonial stem cells: Comparing the effectiveness of testicular tissue and single cell suspension cryopreservation",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether optimal human spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) cryopreservation is best achieved with testicular tissue or single cell suspension cryopreservation. This study compares the effectiveness between these two approaches by using testicular SSEA-4+ cells, a known population containing SSCs. Design: In vitro human testicular tissues. Setting: Academic research unit. Patient(s): Adult testicular tissues (n = 4) collected from subjects with normal spermatogenesis and normal fetal testicular tissues (n = 3). Intervention(s): Testicular tissue versus single cell suspension cryopreservation. Main Outcome Measure(s): Cell viability, total cell recovery per milligram of tissue, as well as viable and SSEA-4+ cell recovery. Result(s): Single cell suspension cryopreservation yielded higher recovery of SSEA-4+ cells enriched in adult SSCs, whereas fetal SSEA-4+ cell recovery was similar between testicular tissue and single cell suspension cryopreservation. Conclusion(s): Adult and fetal human SSEA-4+ populations exhibited differential sensitivity to cryopreservation based on whether they were cryopreserved in situ as testicular tissues or as single cells. Thus, optimal preservation of human SSCs depends on the patient's age, type of samples cryopreserved, and end points of therapeutic applications.",
keywords = "Spermatogonial stem cells, Testicular cell cryopreservation, Testicular tissue cryopreservation",
author = "Pamela Yango and Eran Altman and Smith, {James F.} and Klatsky, {Peter C.} and Tran, {Nam D.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1250",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "1491--1498",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing cryopreservation of human spermatogonial stem cells

T2 - Comparing the effectiveness of testicular tissue and single cell suspension cryopreservation

AU - Yango, Pamela

AU - Altman, Eran

AU - Smith, James F.

AU - Klatsky, Peter C.

AU - Tran, Nam D.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: To determine whether optimal human spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) cryopreservation is best achieved with testicular tissue or single cell suspension cryopreservation. This study compares the effectiveness between these two approaches by using testicular SSEA-4+ cells, a known population containing SSCs. Design: In vitro human testicular tissues. Setting: Academic research unit. Patient(s): Adult testicular tissues (n = 4) collected from subjects with normal spermatogenesis and normal fetal testicular tissues (n = 3). Intervention(s): Testicular tissue versus single cell suspension cryopreservation. Main Outcome Measure(s): Cell viability, total cell recovery per milligram of tissue, as well as viable and SSEA-4+ cell recovery. Result(s): Single cell suspension cryopreservation yielded higher recovery of SSEA-4+ cells enriched in adult SSCs, whereas fetal SSEA-4+ cell recovery was similar between testicular tissue and single cell suspension cryopreservation. Conclusion(s): Adult and fetal human SSEA-4+ populations exhibited differential sensitivity to cryopreservation based on whether they were cryopreserved in situ as testicular tissues or as single cells. Thus, optimal preservation of human SSCs depends on the patient's age, type of samples cryopreserved, and end points of therapeutic applications.

AB - Objective: To determine whether optimal human spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) cryopreservation is best achieved with testicular tissue or single cell suspension cryopreservation. This study compares the effectiveness between these two approaches by using testicular SSEA-4+ cells, a known population containing SSCs. Design: In vitro human testicular tissues. Setting: Academic research unit. Patient(s): Adult testicular tissues (n = 4) collected from subjects with normal spermatogenesis and normal fetal testicular tissues (n = 3). Intervention(s): Testicular tissue versus single cell suspension cryopreservation. Main Outcome Measure(s): Cell viability, total cell recovery per milligram of tissue, as well as viable and SSEA-4+ cell recovery. Result(s): Single cell suspension cryopreservation yielded higher recovery of SSEA-4+ cells enriched in adult SSCs, whereas fetal SSEA-4+ cell recovery was similar between testicular tissue and single cell suspension cryopreservation. Conclusion(s): Adult and fetal human SSEA-4+ populations exhibited differential sensitivity to cryopreservation based on whether they were cryopreserved in situ as testicular tissues or as single cells. Thus, optimal preservation of human SSCs depends on the patient's age, type of samples cryopreserved, and end points of therapeutic applications.

KW - Spermatogonial stem cells

KW - Testicular cell cryopreservation

KW - Testicular tissue cryopreservation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922015158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922015158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1250

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1250

M3 - Article

C2 - 25241367

AN - SCOPUS:84922015158

VL - 102

SP - 1491

EP - 1498

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 5

ER -