Opinions regarding neonatal resuscitation training for the obstetric physician: a survey of neonatal and obstetric training program directors

C. J. Bruno, L. Johnston, C. Lee, Peter S. Bernstein, D. Goffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Our goal was to garner opinions regarding neonatal resuscitation training for obstetric physicians. We sought to evaluate obstacles to neonatal resuscitation training for obstetric physicians and possible solutions for implementation challenges. Materials and methods: We distributed a national survey via email to all neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship directors and obstetrics & gynecology residency program directors in the United States. This survey was designed by a consensus method. Results: Ninety-eight (53%) obstetric and fifty-seven (51%) neonatal program directors responded to our surveys. Eighty-eight percent of neonatologists surveyed believe that obstetricians should be neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) certified. The majority of surveyed obstetricians (>89%) believe that obstetricians should have some neonatal resuscitation training. Eighty-six percent of obstetric residents have completed training in NRP, but only 19% of obstetric attendings are NRP certified. Major barriers to NRP training that were identified include time, lack of national requirement, lack of belief it is helpful, and cost. Conclusions: Most obstetric attendings are not NRP certified, but the majority of respondents believe that obstetric providers should have some neonatal resuscitation training. Our study demonstrates that most respondents support a modified neonatal resuscitation course for obstetric physicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Mar 31 2017

Fingerprint

Resuscitation
Obstetrics
Physicians
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires
Internship and Residency
Gynecology
Medicine
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • cardiopulmonary
  • delivery room
  • Newborns
  • obstetricians
  • resuscitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

@article{4efc3c4f51a041f29a84e9eaa664e83c,
title = "Opinions regarding neonatal resuscitation training for the obstetric physician: a survey of neonatal and obstetric training program directors",
abstract = "Purpose: Our goal was to garner opinions regarding neonatal resuscitation training for obstetric physicians. We sought to evaluate obstacles to neonatal resuscitation training for obstetric physicians and possible solutions for implementation challenges. Materials and methods: We distributed a national survey via email to all neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship directors and obstetrics & gynecology residency program directors in the United States. This survey was designed by a consensus method. Results: Ninety-eight (53{\%}) obstetric and fifty-seven (51{\%}) neonatal program directors responded to our surveys. Eighty-eight percent of neonatologists surveyed believe that obstetricians should be neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) certified. The majority of surveyed obstetricians (>89{\%}) believe that obstetricians should have some neonatal resuscitation training. Eighty-six percent of obstetric residents have completed training in NRP, but only 19{\%} of obstetric attendings are NRP certified. Major barriers to NRP training that were identified include time, lack of national requirement, lack of belief it is helpful, and cost. Conclusions: Most obstetric attendings are not NRP certified, but the majority of respondents believe that obstetric providers should have some neonatal resuscitation training. Our study demonstrates that most respondents support a modified neonatal resuscitation course for obstetric physicians.",
keywords = "cardiopulmonary, delivery room, Newborns, obstetricians, resuscitation",
author = "Bruno, {C. J.} and L. Johnston and C. Lee and Bernstein, {Peter S.} and D. Goffman",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/14767058.2017.1306052",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
issn = "1476-7058",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opinions regarding neonatal resuscitation training for the obstetric physician

T2 - a survey of neonatal and obstetric training program directors

AU - Bruno, C. J.

AU - Johnston, L.

AU - Lee, C.

AU - Bernstein, Peter S.

AU - Goffman, D.

PY - 2017/3/31

Y1 - 2017/3/31

N2 - Purpose: Our goal was to garner opinions regarding neonatal resuscitation training for obstetric physicians. We sought to evaluate obstacles to neonatal resuscitation training for obstetric physicians and possible solutions for implementation challenges. Materials and methods: We distributed a national survey via email to all neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship directors and obstetrics & gynecology residency program directors in the United States. This survey was designed by a consensus method. Results: Ninety-eight (53%) obstetric and fifty-seven (51%) neonatal program directors responded to our surveys. Eighty-eight percent of neonatologists surveyed believe that obstetricians should be neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) certified. The majority of surveyed obstetricians (>89%) believe that obstetricians should have some neonatal resuscitation training. Eighty-six percent of obstetric residents have completed training in NRP, but only 19% of obstetric attendings are NRP certified. Major barriers to NRP training that were identified include time, lack of national requirement, lack of belief it is helpful, and cost. Conclusions: Most obstetric attendings are not NRP certified, but the majority of respondents believe that obstetric providers should have some neonatal resuscitation training. Our study demonstrates that most respondents support a modified neonatal resuscitation course for obstetric physicians.

AB - Purpose: Our goal was to garner opinions regarding neonatal resuscitation training for obstetric physicians. We sought to evaluate obstacles to neonatal resuscitation training for obstetric physicians and possible solutions for implementation challenges. Materials and methods: We distributed a national survey via email to all neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship directors and obstetrics & gynecology residency program directors in the United States. This survey was designed by a consensus method. Results: Ninety-eight (53%) obstetric and fifty-seven (51%) neonatal program directors responded to our surveys. Eighty-eight percent of neonatologists surveyed believe that obstetricians should be neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) certified. The majority of surveyed obstetricians (>89%) believe that obstetricians should have some neonatal resuscitation training. Eighty-six percent of obstetric residents have completed training in NRP, but only 19% of obstetric attendings are NRP certified. Major barriers to NRP training that were identified include time, lack of national requirement, lack of belief it is helpful, and cost. Conclusions: Most obstetric attendings are not NRP certified, but the majority of respondents believe that obstetric providers should have some neonatal resuscitation training. Our study demonstrates that most respondents support a modified neonatal resuscitation course for obstetric physicians.

KW - cardiopulmonary

KW - delivery room

KW - Newborns

KW - obstetricians

KW - resuscitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016964494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016964494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14767058.2017.1306052

DO - 10.1080/14767058.2017.1306052

M3 - Article

C2 - 28287006

AN - SCOPUS:85016964494

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1476-7058

ER -