Online Survey of Radiologic Ordering Practices by Pediatric Trainees

David A. Hirschl, Carrie Ruzal-Shapiro, Benjamin H. Taragin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The ACR has developed appropriateness criteria to ensure that patients are receiving appropriate imaging studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the imaging ordering practices of pediatric residents in specific clinical scenarios with the ACR Appropriateness Criteria<sup>®</sup>. Materials and Methods: A multiple-choice questionnaire was created using 10 clinical scenarios excerpted from the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. The questionnaire was sent to 69 pediatric residents (postgraduate years 1-3) at Children's Hospital of New York at Columbia University Medical Center (CHONY) and then to 75 pediatric residents at The Children's Hospital at Montefiore Medical Center (CHAM). The responses were compared with the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Results: Seventy-five and 69 pediatric residents from the CHAM and CHONY, respectively, were invited to participate in the survey. Thirty-nine individual responses (52%) were received from CHAM, and 41 (59%) were received from CHONY. A total of 27 responses were received from first-year residents, 28 from second-year residents, and 25 from third-year residents. The average number of questions answered incorrectly by first-year residents was 4.1, by second-year residents was 4.4, and by third-year residents was 4.5. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that residents appreciate the value of an imaging workup, but these examinations are often ordered without the consultation of a radiologist. The decision each resident makes reflects individual training. To improve residents' ability to make decisions regarding imaging examinations, radiologists must educate pediatric residents with uniform case-based and didactic sessions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)360-363
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume7
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Pediatrics
Referral and Consultation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Appropriateness
  • criteria
  • pediatric
  • radiation
  • residents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Online Survey of Radiologic Ordering Practices by Pediatric Trainees. / Hirschl, David A.; Ruzal-Shapiro, Carrie; Taragin, Benjamin H.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 7, No. 5, 2010, p. 360-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hirschl, David A. ; Ruzal-Shapiro, Carrie ; Taragin, Benjamin H. / Online Survey of Radiologic Ordering Practices by Pediatric Trainees. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2010 ; Vol. 7, No. 5. pp. 360-363.
@article{eb351f4e6ba04edfbf6138e5dd1f6fda,
title = "Online Survey of Radiologic Ordering Practices by Pediatric Trainees",
abstract = "Objective: The ACR has developed appropriateness criteria to ensure that patients are receiving appropriate imaging studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the imaging ordering practices of pediatric residents in specific clinical scenarios with the ACR Appropriateness Criteria{\circledR}. Materials and Methods: A multiple-choice questionnaire was created using 10 clinical scenarios excerpted from the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. The questionnaire was sent to 69 pediatric residents (postgraduate years 1-3) at Children's Hospital of New York at Columbia University Medical Center (CHONY) and then to 75 pediatric residents at The Children's Hospital at Montefiore Medical Center (CHAM). The responses were compared with the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Results: Seventy-five and 69 pediatric residents from the CHAM and CHONY, respectively, were invited to participate in the survey. Thirty-nine individual responses (52{\%}) were received from CHAM, and 41 (59{\%}) were received from CHONY. A total of 27 responses were received from first-year residents, 28 from second-year residents, and 25 from third-year residents. The average number of questions answered incorrectly by first-year residents was 4.1, by second-year residents was 4.4, and by third-year residents was 4.5. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that residents appreciate the value of an imaging workup, but these examinations are often ordered without the consultation of a radiologist. The decision each resident makes reflects individual training. To improve residents' ability to make decisions regarding imaging examinations, radiologists must educate pediatric residents with uniform case-based and didactic sessions.",
keywords = "Appropriateness, criteria, pediatric, radiation, residents",
author = "Hirschl, {David A.} and Carrie Ruzal-Shapiro and Taragin, {Benjamin H.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2009.12.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "360--363",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Online Survey of Radiologic Ordering Practices by Pediatric Trainees

AU - Hirschl, David A.

AU - Ruzal-Shapiro, Carrie

AU - Taragin, Benjamin H.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Objective: The ACR has developed appropriateness criteria to ensure that patients are receiving appropriate imaging studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the imaging ordering practices of pediatric residents in specific clinical scenarios with the ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. Materials and Methods: A multiple-choice questionnaire was created using 10 clinical scenarios excerpted from the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. The questionnaire was sent to 69 pediatric residents (postgraduate years 1-3) at Children's Hospital of New York at Columbia University Medical Center (CHONY) and then to 75 pediatric residents at The Children's Hospital at Montefiore Medical Center (CHAM). The responses were compared with the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Results: Seventy-five and 69 pediatric residents from the CHAM and CHONY, respectively, were invited to participate in the survey. Thirty-nine individual responses (52%) were received from CHAM, and 41 (59%) were received from CHONY. A total of 27 responses were received from first-year residents, 28 from second-year residents, and 25 from third-year residents. The average number of questions answered incorrectly by first-year residents was 4.1, by second-year residents was 4.4, and by third-year residents was 4.5. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that residents appreciate the value of an imaging workup, but these examinations are often ordered without the consultation of a radiologist. The decision each resident makes reflects individual training. To improve residents' ability to make decisions regarding imaging examinations, radiologists must educate pediatric residents with uniform case-based and didactic sessions.

AB - Objective: The ACR has developed appropriateness criteria to ensure that patients are receiving appropriate imaging studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the imaging ordering practices of pediatric residents in specific clinical scenarios with the ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. Materials and Methods: A multiple-choice questionnaire was created using 10 clinical scenarios excerpted from the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. The questionnaire was sent to 69 pediatric residents (postgraduate years 1-3) at Children's Hospital of New York at Columbia University Medical Center (CHONY) and then to 75 pediatric residents at The Children's Hospital at Montefiore Medical Center (CHAM). The responses were compared with the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Results: Seventy-five and 69 pediatric residents from the CHAM and CHONY, respectively, were invited to participate in the survey. Thirty-nine individual responses (52%) were received from CHAM, and 41 (59%) were received from CHONY. A total of 27 responses were received from first-year residents, 28 from second-year residents, and 25 from third-year residents. The average number of questions answered incorrectly by first-year residents was 4.1, by second-year residents was 4.4, and by third-year residents was 4.5. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that residents appreciate the value of an imaging workup, but these examinations are often ordered without the consultation of a radiologist. The decision each resident makes reflects individual training. To improve residents' ability to make decisions regarding imaging examinations, radiologists must educate pediatric residents with uniform case-based and didactic sessions.

KW - Appropriateness

KW - criteria

KW - pediatric

KW - radiation

KW - residents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928096705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928096705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.12.017

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.12.017

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 360

EP - 363

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 5

ER -