On the dose to a moving target while employing different IMRT delivery mechanisms

Eric D. Ehler, Benjamin E. Nelms, Wolfgang A. Tome

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and purposes: To compare the temporal uniformity in dose delivered to a moving target for various intensity modulation radiotherapy (IMRT) modalities: solid intensity modulator (SIM), segmented multi-leaf collimator (SMLC), and dynamic multi-leaf collimator (DMLC). Materials and methods: Two separate four-dimensional computed tomography data sets were obtained. Tumor motion kernels and motion envelopes were determined from composite positions of the tumor in various phases of the breathing cycle. Treatment plans were created for an unmodulated open field, SIM, SMLC, and DMLC. The motion envelope was treated as a static target volume. A robotic apparatus equipped with a diode array simulated the tumor motion in the plane of the beam's eye view (BEV). Radiation was delivered to the moving target over ten trials for each modality. The average coefficient of variation (CV) was determined for each beam angle. Results: The CV ranged from 0.09% to 0.15%, 0.23% to 3.14%, 1.14% to 5.51%, and 3.83% to 8.25% for the unmodulated open field, SIM, SMLC, and DMLC modalities, respectively. With gating, the CV was 0.23% to 2.31%, 0.31% to 2.97%, and 0.7% to 4.67% for SIM, SMLC, and DMLC, respectively. Conclusion: SIM consistently provided the most temporally uniform dose to the moving target while DMLC provided the least. The SMLC and DMLC CV improved with gated delivery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-56
Number of pages8
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography
Neoplasms
Robotics
Respiration
Radiation
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • 4D IMRT
  • Gated IMRT delivery
  • Gating
  • Intrafraction motion
  • Temporal dose uniformity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Urology

Cite this

On the dose to a moving target while employing different IMRT delivery mechanisms. / Ehler, Eric D.; Nelms, Benjamin E.; Tome, Wolfgang A.

In: Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 83, No. 1, 04.2007, p. 49-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{80b39762adcc4a18bc7b272ca930cd66,
title = "On the dose to a moving target while employing different IMRT delivery mechanisms",
abstract = "Background and purposes: To compare the temporal uniformity in dose delivered to a moving target for various intensity modulation radiotherapy (IMRT) modalities: solid intensity modulator (SIM), segmented multi-leaf collimator (SMLC), and dynamic multi-leaf collimator (DMLC). Materials and methods: Two separate four-dimensional computed tomography data sets were obtained. Tumor motion kernels and motion envelopes were determined from composite positions of the tumor in various phases of the breathing cycle. Treatment plans were created for an unmodulated open field, SIM, SMLC, and DMLC. The motion envelope was treated as a static target volume. A robotic apparatus equipped with a diode array simulated the tumor motion in the plane of the beam's eye view (BEV). Radiation was delivered to the moving target over ten trials for each modality. The average coefficient of variation (CV) was determined for each beam angle. Results: The CV ranged from 0.09{\%} to 0.15{\%}, 0.23{\%} to 3.14{\%}, 1.14{\%} to 5.51{\%}, and 3.83{\%} to 8.25{\%} for the unmodulated open field, SIM, SMLC, and DMLC modalities, respectively. With gating, the CV was 0.23{\%} to 2.31{\%}, 0.31{\%} to 2.97{\%}, and 0.7{\%} to 4.67{\%} for SIM, SMLC, and DMLC, respectively. Conclusion: SIM consistently provided the most temporally uniform dose to the moving target while DMLC provided the least. The SMLC and DMLC CV improved with gated delivery.",
keywords = "4D IMRT, Gated IMRT delivery, Gating, Intrafraction motion, Temporal dose uniformity",
author = "Ehler, {Eric D.} and Nelms, {Benjamin E.} and Tome, {Wolfgang A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "49--56",
journal = "Radiotherapy and Oncology",
issn = "0167-8140",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the dose to a moving target while employing different IMRT delivery mechanisms

AU - Ehler, Eric D.

AU - Nelms, Benjamin E.

AU - Tome, Wolfgang A.

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Background and purposes: To compare the temporal uniformity in dose delivered to a moving target for various intensity modulation radiotherapy (IMRT) modalities: solid intensity modulator (SIM), segmented multi-leaf collimator (SMLC), and dynamic multi-leaf collimator (DMLC). Materials and methods: Two separate four-dimensional computed tomography data sets were obtained. Tumor motion kernels and motion envelopes were determined from composite positions of the tumor in various phases of the breathing cycle. Treatment plans were created for an unmodulated open field, SIM, SMLC, and DMLC. The motion envelope was treated as a static target volume. A robotic apparatus equipped with a diode array simulated the tumor motion in the plane of the beam's eye view (BEV). Radiation was delivered to the moving target over ten trials for each modality. The average coefficient of variation (CV) was determined for each beam angle. Results: The CV ranged from 0.09% to 0.15%, 0.23% to 3.14%, 1.14% to 5.51%, and 3.83% to 8.25% for the unmodulated open field, SIM, SMLC, and DMLC modalities, respectively. With gating, the CV was 0.23% to 2.31%, 0.31% to 2.97%, and 0.7% to 4.67% for SIM, SMLC, and DMLC, respectively. Conclusion: SIM consistently provided the most temporally uniform dose to the moving target while DMLC provided the least. The SMLC and DMLC CV improved with gated delivery.

AB - Background and purposes: To compare the temporal uniformity in dose delivered to a moving target for various intensity modulation radiotherapy (IMRT) modalities: solid intensity modulator (SIM), segmented multi-leaf collimator (SMLC), and dynamic multi-leaf collimator (DMLC). Materials and methods: Two separate four-dimensional computed tomography data sets were obtained. Tumor motion kernels and motion envelopes were determined from composite positions of the tumor in various phases of the breathing cycle. Treatment plans were created for an unmodulated open field, SIM, SMLC, and DMLC. The motion envelope was treated as a static target volume. A robotic apparatus equipped with a diode array simulated the tumor motion in the plane of the beam's eye view (BEV). Radiation was delivered to the moving target over ten trials for each modality. The average coefficient of variation (CV) was determined for each beam angle. Results: The CV ranged from 0.09% to 0.15%, 0.23% to 3.14%, 1.14% to 5.51%, and 3.83% to 8.25% for the unmodulated open field, SIM, SMLC, and DMLC modalities, respectively. With gating, the CV was 0.23% to 2.31%, 0.31% to 2.97%, and 0.7% to 4.67% for SIM, SMLC, and DMLC, respectively. Conclusion: SIM consistently provided the most temporally uniform dose to the moving target while DMLC provided the least. The SMLC and DMLC CV improved with gated delivery.

KW - 4D IMRT

KW - Gated IMRT delivery

KW - Gating

KW - Intrafraction motion

KW - Temporal dose uniformity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34047271046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34047271046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.007

DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.02.007

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 49

EP - 56

JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology

JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology

SN - 0167-8140

IS - 1

ER -