Off pump concomitant coronary revascularization and carotid endarterectomy

R. B. Beauford, C. R. Saunders, Daniel J. Goldstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim. Off pump coronary revascularization has emerged as a viable option in the treatment of coexisting clinically significant carotid and coronary artery disease. To this end, we report our recent experience with combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and off pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). Methods. Our prospectively updated database was queried to identify all patients who underwent combined OPCAB/CEA between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2002. A total of 38 patients were identified. They were subsequently compared to a contemporaneous cohort of isolated off-pump patients divided into those with and without cerebrovascular disease (CVD). Results. Mean age of the study population was 71±7.0 years, 23 patients (58%) had significant left main disease, 5 (13%) suffered a previous stroke and 5 (13%) had ejection fractions ≤30%. The study group had 1 postoperative myocardial infarction and no postoperative cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). There was 1 in-hospital death (3%) however, there were no significant differences noted in mortality between the study groups. Conclusion. The optimal management of the multifocal atherosclerotic patient remains controversial and this dilemma is further clouded by the recent introduction of OPCAB, and more recently, carotid stenting. Our results suggest that combined OPCAB/CEA is safe and may reduce the risk of postoperative stroke. An economic benefit may also be inferred from shorter hospitalization as well as eliminating the need for another procedure. Randomization and long term follow-up are now required to verify these encouraging early findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-415
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume44
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Carotid Endarterectomy
Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass
Stroke
Cerebrovascular Disorders
Carotid Artery Diseases
Random Allocation
Coronary Artery Disease
Hospitalization
Myocardial Infarction
Economics
Databases
Mortality
Population

Keywords

  • Carotid stenosis
  • Coronary artery bypass
  • Coronary disease
  • Endarterectomy, carotid

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Off pump concomitant coronary revascularization and carotid endarterectomy. / Beauford, R. B.; Saunders, C. R.; Goldstein, Daniel J.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 44, No. 3, 06.2003, p. 407-415.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9e207411d17c41a98975e8395b381516,
title = "Off pump concomitant coronary revascularization and carotid endarterectomy",
abstract = "Aim. Off pump coronary revascularization has emerged as a viable option in the treatment of coexisting clinically significant carotid and coronary artery disease. To this end, we report our recent experience with combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and off pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). Methods. Our prospectively updated database was queried to identify all patients who underwent combined OPCAB/CEA between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2002. A total of 38 patients were identified. They were subsequently compared to a contemporaneous cohort of isolated off-pump patients divided into those with and without cerebrovascular disease (CVD). Results. Mean age of the study population was 71±7.0 years, 23 patients (58{\%}) had significant left main disease, 5 (13{\%}) suffered a previous stroke and 5 (13{\%}) had ejection fractions ≤30{\%}. The study group had 1 postoperative myocardial infarction and no postoperative cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). There was 1 in-hospital death (3{\%}) however, there were no significant differences noted in mortality between the study groups. Conclusion. The optimal management of the multifocal atherosclerotic patient remains controversial and this dilemma is further clouded by the recent introduction of OPCAB, and more recently, carotid stenting. Our results suggest that combined OPCAB/CEA is safe and may reduce the risk of postoperative stroke. An economic benefit may also be inferred from shorter hospitalization as well as eliminating the need for another procedure. Randomization and long term follow-up are now required to verify these encouraging early findings.",
keywords = "Carotid stenosis, Coronary artery bypass, Coronary disease, Endarterectomy, carotid",
author = "Beauford, {R. B.} and Saunders, {C. R.} and Goldstein, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "407--415",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery",
issn = "0021-9509",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Off pump concomitant coronary revascularization and carotid endarterectomy

AU - Beauford, R. B.

AU - Saunders, C. R.

AU - Goldstein, Daniel J.

PY - 2003/6

Y1 - 2003/6

N2 - Aim. Off pump coronary revascularization has emerged as a viable option in the treatment of coexisting clinically significant carotid and coronary artery disease. To this end, we report our recent experience with combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and off pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). Methods. Our prospectively updated database was queried to identify all patients who underwent combined OPCAB/CEA between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2002. A total of 38 patients were identified. They were subsequently compared to a contemporaneous cohort of isolated off-pump patients divided into those with and without cerebrovascular disease (CVD). Results. Mean age of the study population was 71±7.0 years, 23 patients (58%) had significant left main disease, 5 (13%) suffered a previous stroke and 5 (13%) had ejection fractions ≤30%. The study group had 1 postoperative myocardial infarction and no postoperative cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). There was 1 in-hospital death (3%) however, there were no significant differences noted in mortality between the study groups. Conclusion. The optimal management of the multifocal atherosclerotic patient remains controversial and this dilemma is further clouded by the recent introduction of OPCAB, and more recently, carotid stenting. Our results suggest that combined OPCAB/CEA is safe and may reduce the risk of postoperative stroke. An economic benefit may also be inferred from shorter hospitalization as well as eliminating the need for another procedure. Randomization and long term follow-up are now required to verify these encouraging early findings.

AB - Aim. Off pump coronary revascularization has emerged as a viable option in the treatment of coexisting clinically significant carotid and coronary artery disease. To this end, we report our recent experience with combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and off pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). Methods. Our prospectively updated database was queried to identify all patients who underwent combined OPCAB/CEA between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2002. A total of 38 patients were identified. They were subsequently compared to a contemporaneous cohort of isolated off-pump patients divided into those with and without cerebrovascular disease (CVD). Results. Mean age of the study population was 71±7.0 years, 23 patients (58%) had significant left main disease, 5 (13%) suffered a previous stroke and 5 (13%) had ejection fractions ≤30%. The study group had 1 postoperative myocardial infarction and no postoperative cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). There was 1 in-hospital death (3%) however, there were no significant differences noted in mortality between the study groups. Conclusion. The optimal management of the multifocal atherosclerotic patient remains controversial and this dilemma is further clouded by the recent introduction of OPCAB, and more recently, carotid stenting. Our results suggest that combined OPCAB/CEA is safe and may reduce the risk of postoperative stroke. An economic benefit may also be inferred from shorter hospitalization as well as eliminating the need for another procedure. Randomization and long term follow-up are now required to verify these encouraging early findings.

KW - Carotid stenosis

KW - Coronary artery bypass

KW - Coronary disease

KW - Endarterectomy, carotid

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042701526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042701526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12832994

AN - SCOPUS:0042701526

VL - 44

SP - 407

EP - 415

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

SN - 0021-9509

IS - 3

ER -