Observational Study Design in Veterinary Pathology, Part 2: Methodology

Jeff L. Caswell, Laura L. Bassel, Jamie L. Rothenburger, Andrea Gröne, Jan M. Sargeant, Amanda P. Beck, Stina Ekman, Katherine N. Gibson-Corley, Thijs Kuiken, Elise E.B. LaDouceur, David K. Meyerholz, Francesco C. Origgi, Horst Posthaus, Simon L. Priestnall, Lorenzo Ressel, Leslie Sharkey, Leandro B.C. Teixeira, Kazuyuki Uchida, Jerrold M. Ward, Joshua D. WebsterJyoji Yamate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Observational studies are a basis for much of our knowledge of veterinary pathology, yet considerations for conducting pathology-based observational studies are not readily available. In part 1 of this series, we offered advice on planning and carrying out an observational study. Part 2 of the series focuses on methodology. Our general recommendations are to consider using already-validated methods, published guidelines, data from primary sources, and quantitative analyses. We discuss 3 common methods in pathology research-histopathologic scoring, immunohistochemistry, and polymerase chain reaction-to illustrate principles of method validation. Some aspects of quality control include use of clear objective grading criteria, validation of key reagents, assessing sample quality, determining specificity and sensitivity, use of technical and biologic negative and positive controls, blinding of investigators, approaches to minimizing operator-dependent variation, measuring technical variation, and consistency in analysis of the different study groups. We close by discussing approaches to increasing the rigor of observational studies by corroborating results with complementary methods, using sufficiently large numbers of study subjects, consideration of the data in light of similar published studies, replicating the results in a second study population, and critical analysis of the study findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)774-785
Number of pages12
JournalVeterinary Pathology
Volume55
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Veterinary Pathology
observational studies
Observational Studies
experimental design
Pathology
Information Storage and Retrieval
methodology
Quality Control
operator regions
Immunohistochemistry
Research Personnel
quality control
immunohistochemistry
Guidelines
Sensitivity and Specificity
Polymerase Chain Reaction
planning
polymerase chain reaction
Research
Population

Keywords

  • epidemiology
  • histologic grading
  • immunohistochemistry
  • method validation
  • observational studies
  • pathology
  • quantitative PCR
  • reproducibility of results
  • research design
  • robustness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Caswell, J. L., Bassel, L. L., Rothenburger, J. L., Gröne, A., Sargeant, J. M., Beck, A. P., ... Yamate, J. (2018). Observational Study Design in Veterinary Pathology, Part 2: Methodology. Veterinary Pathology, 55(6), 774-785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985818798121

Observational Study Design in Veterinary Pathology, Part 2 : Methodology. / Caswell, Jeff L.; Bassel, Laura L.; Rothenburger, Jamie L.; Gröne, Andrea; Sargeant, Jan M.; Beck, Amanda P.; Ekman, Stina; Gibson-Corley, Katherine N.; Kuiken, Thijs; LaDouceur, Elise E.B.; Meyerholz, David K.; Origgi, Francesco C.; Posthaus, Horst; Priestnall, Simon L.; Ressel, Lorenzo; Sharkey, Leslie; Teixeira, Leandro B.C.; Uchida, Kazuyuki; Ward, Jerrold M.; Webster, Joshua D.; Yamate, Jyoji.

In: Veterinary Pathology, Vol. 55, No. 6, 01.11.2018, p. 774-785.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caswell, JL, Bassel, LL, Rothenburger, JL, Gröne, A, Sargeant, JM, Beck, AP, Ekman, S, Gibson-Corley, KN, Kuiken, T, LaDouceur, EEB, Meyerholz, DK, Origgi, FC, Posthaus, H, Priestnall, SL, Ressel, L, Sharkey, L, Teixeira, LBC, Uchida, K, Ward, JM, Webster, JD & Yamate, J 2018, 'Observational Study Design in Veterinary Pathology, Part 2: Methodology', Veterinary Pathology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 774-785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985818798121
Caswell JL, Bassel LL, Rothenburger JL, Gröne A, Sargeant JM, Beck AP et al. Observational Study Design in Veterinary Pathology, Part 2: Methodology. Veterinary Pathology. 2018 Nov 1;55(6):774-785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985818798121
Caswell, Jeff L. ; Bassel, Laura L. ; Rothenburger, Jamie L. ; Gröne, Andrea ; Sargeant, Jan M. ; Beck, Amanda P. ; Ekman, Stina ; Gibson-Corley, Katherine N. ; Kuiken, Thijs ; LaDouceur, Elise E.B. ; Meyerholz, David K. ; Origgi, Francesco C. ; Posthaus, Horst ; Priestnall, Simon L. ; Ressel, Lorenzo ; Sharkey, Leslie ; Teixeira, Leandro B.C. ; Uchida, Kazuyuki ; Ward, Jerrold M. ; Webster, Joshua D. ; Yamate, Jyoji. / Observational Study Design in Veterinary Pathology, Part 2 : Methodology. In: Veterinary Pathology. 2018 ; Vol. 55, No. 6. pp. 774-785.
@article{3b309728a61d410e845129fe3189f393,
title = "Observational Study Design in Veterinary Pathology, Part 2: Methodology",
abstract = "Observational studies are a basis for much of our knowledge of veterinary pathology, yet considerations for conducting pathology-based observational studies are not readily available. In part 1 of this series, we offered advice on planning and carrying out an observational study. Part 2 of the series focuses on methodology. Our general recommendations are to consider using already-validated methods, published guidelines, data from primary sources, and quantitative analyses. We discuss 3 common methods in pathology research-histopathologic scoring, immunohistochemistry, and polymerase chain reaction-to illustrate principles of method validation. Some aspects of quality control include use of clear objective grading criteria, validation of key reagents, assessing sample quality, determining specificity and sensitivity, use of technical and biologic negative and positive controls, blinding of investigators, approaches to minimizing operator-dependent variation, measuring technical variation, and consistency in analysis of the different study groups. We close by discussing approaches to increasing the rigor of observational studies by corroborating results with complementary methods, using sufficiently large numbers of study subjects, consideration of the data in light of similar published studies, replicating the results in a second study population, and critical analysis of the study findings.",
keywords = "epidemiology, histologic grading, immunohistochemistry, method validation, observational studies, pathology, quantitative PCR, reproducibility of results, research design, robustness",
author = "Caswell, {Jeff L.} and Bassel, {Laura L.} and Rothenburger, {Jamie L.} and Andrea Gr{\"o}ne and Sargeant, {Jan M.} and Beck, {Amanda P.} and Stina Ekman and Gibson-Corley, {Katherine N.} and Thijs Kuiken and LaDouceur, {Elise E.B.} and Meyerholz, {David K.} and Origgi, {Francesco C.} and Horst Posthaus and Priestnall, {Simon L.} and Lorenzo Ressel and Leslie Sharkey and Teixeira, {Leandro B.C.} and Kazuyuki Uchida and Ward, {Jerrold M.} and Webster, {Joshua D.} and Jyoji Yamate",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0300985818798121",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "774--785",
journal = "Veterinary Pathology",
issn = "0300-9858",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Observational Study Design in Veterinary Pathology, Part 2

T2 - Methodology

AU - Caswell, Jeff L.

AU - Bassel, Laura L.

AU - Rothenburger, Jamie L.

AU - Gröne, Andrea

AU - Sargeant, Jan M.

AU - Beck, Amanda P.

AU - Ekman, Stina

AU - Gibson-Corley, Katherine N.

AU - Kuiken, Thijs

AU - LaDouceur, Elise E.B.

AU - Meyerholz, David K.

AU - Origgi, Francesco C.

AU - Posthaus, Horst

AU - Priestnall, Simon L.

AU - Ressel, Lorenzo

AU - Sharkey, Leslie

AU - Teixeira, Leandro B.C.

AU - Uchida, Kazuyuki

AU - Ward, Jerrold M.

AU - Webster, Joshua D.

AU - Yamate, Jyoji

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Observational studies are a basis for much of our knowledge of veterinary pathology, yet considerations for conducting pathology-based observational studies are not readily available. In part 1 of this series, we offered advice on planning and carrying out an observational study. Part 2 of the series focuses on methodology. Our general recommendations are to consider using already-validated methods, published guidelines, data from primary sources, and quantitative analyses. We discuss 3 common methods in pathology research-histopathologic scoring, immunohistochemistry, and polymerase chain reaction-to illustrate principles of method validation. Some aspects of quality control include use of clear objective grading criteria, validation of key reagents, assessing sample quality, determining specificity and sensitivity, use of technical and biologic negative and positive controls, blinding of investigators, approaches to minimizing operator-dependent variation, measuring technical variation, and consistency in analysis of the different study groups. We close by discussing approaches to increasing the rigor of observational studies by corroborating results with complementary methods, using sufficiently large numbers of study subjects, consideration of the data in light of similar published studies, replicating the results in a second study population, and critical analysis of the study findings.

AB - Observational studies are a basis for much of our knowledge of veterinary pathology, yet considerations for conducting pathology-based observational studies are not readily available. In part 1 of this series, we offered advice on planning and carrying out an observational study. Part 2 of the series focuses on methodology. Our general recommendations are to consider using already-validated methods, published guidelines, data from primary sources, and quantitative analyses. We discuss 3 common methods in pathology research-histopathologic scoring, immunohistochemistry, and polymerase chain reaction-to illustrate principles of method validation. Some aspects of quality control include use of clear objective grading criteria, validation of key reagents, assessing sample quality, determining specificity and sensitivity, use of technical and biologic negative and positive controls, blinding of investigators, approaches to minimizing operator-dependent variation, measuring technical variation, and consistency in analysis of the different study groups. We close by discussing approaches to increasing the rigor of observational studies by corroborating results with complementary methods, using sufficiently large numbers of study subjects, consideration of the data in light of similar published studies, replicating the results in a second study population, and critical analysis of the study findings.

KW - epidemiology

KW - histologic grading

KW - immunohistochemistry

KW - method validation

KW - observational studies

KW - pathology

KW - quantitative PCR

KW - reproducibility of results

KW - research design

KW - robustness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052200485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052200485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0300985818798121

DO - 10.1177/0300985818798121

M3 - Article

C2 - 30227783

AN - SCOPUS:85052200485

VL - 55

SP - 774

EP - 785

JO - Veterinary Pathology

JF - Veterinary Pathology

SN - 0300-9858

IS - 6

ER -