Novel metaphors appear anomalous at least momentarily: Evidence from N400

Vivien C. Tartter, Hilary Gomes, Boris Dubrovsky, Sophie Molholm, Rosemarie Vala Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study addresses a central question in perception of novel figurative language: whether it is interpreted intelligently and figuratively immediately, or only after a literal interpretation fails. Eighty sentence frames that could plausibly end with a literal, truly anomalous, or figurative word were created. After validation for meaningfulness and figurativeness, the 240 sentences were presented to 11 subjects for event related potential (ERP) recording. ERP's first 200 ms is believed to reflect the structuring of the input; the prominence of a dip at around 400 ms (N400) is said to relate inversely to how expected a word is. Results showed no difference between anomalous and metaphoric ERPs in the early window, metaphoric and literal ERPs converging 300-500 ms after the ending, and significant N400s only for anomalous endings. A follow-up study showed that the metaphoric endings were less frequent (in standardized word norms) than were the anomalous and literal endings and that there were significant differences in cloze probabilities (determined from 24 new subjects) among the three ending types: literal > metaphoric > anomalous. It is possible that the low frequency of the metaphoric element and lower cloze probability of the anomalous one contributed to the processes reflected in the early window, while the incongruity and near-zero cloze probability of the anomalous endings produced an N400 effect in them alone. The structure or parse derived for metaphor during the early window appears to yield a preliminary interpretation suggesting anomaly, while semantic analysis reflected in the later window renders a plausible figurative interpretation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)488-509
Number of pages22
JournalBrain and Language
Volume80
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Metaphor
metaphor
interpretation
evidence
Evoked Potentials
Semantics
recording
Language
semantics
event
language
Metaphoric

Keywords

  • Anomaly
  • Cloze probability
  • Figurative language
  • Metaphor
  • N400
  • Selectional restrictions
  • Semantic processing
  • Standard pragmatic model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Novel metaphors appear anomalous at least momentarily : Evidence from N400. / Tartter, Vivien C.; Gomes, Hilary; Dubrovsky, Boris; Molholm, Sophie; Stewart, Rosemarie Vala.

In: Brain and Language, Vol. 80, No. 3, 2002, p. 488-509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tartter, Vivien C. ; Gomes, Hilary ; Dubrovsky, Boris ; Molholm, Sophie ; Stewart, Rosemarie Vala. / Novel metaphors appear anomalous at least momentarily : Evidence from N400. In: Brain and Language. 2002 ; Vol. 80, No. 3. pp. 488-509.
@article{ee690da38bf449229c9df237562a7eee,
title = "Novel metaphors appear anomalous at least momentarily: Evidence from N400",
abstract = "This study addresses a central question in perception of novel figurative language: whether it is interpreted intelligently and figuratively immediately, or only after a literal interpretation fails. Eighty sentence frames that could plausibly end with a literal, truly anomalous, or figurative word were created. After validation for meaningfulness and figurativeness, the 240 sentences were presented to 11 subjects for event related potential (ERP) recording. ERP's first 200 ms is believed to reflect the structuring of the input; the prominence of a dip at around 400 ms (N400) is said to relate inversely to how expected a word is. Results showed no difference between anomalous and metaphoric ERPs in the early window, metaphoric and literal ERPs converging 300-500 ms after the ending, and significant N400s only for anomalous endings. A follow-up study showed that the metaphoric endings were less frequent (in standardized word norms) than were the anomalous and literal endings and that there were significant differences in cloze probabilities (determined from 24 new subjects) among the three ending types: literal > metaphoric > anomalous. It is possible that the low frequency of the metaphoric element and lower cloze probability of the anomalous one contributed to the processes reflected in the early window, while the incongruity and near-zero cloze probability of the anomalous endings produced an N400 effect in them alone. The structure or parse derived for metaphor during the early window appears to yield a preliminary interpretation suggesting anomaly, while semantic analysis reflected in the later window renders a plausible figurative interpretation.",
keywords = "Anomaly, Cloze probability, Figurative language, Metaphor, N400, Selectional restrictions, Semantic processing, Standard pragmatic model",
author = "Tartter, {Vivien C.} and Hilary Gomes and Boris Dubrovsky and Sophie Molholm and Stewart, {Rosemarie Vala}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1006/brln.2001.2610",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "488--509",
journal = "Brain and Language",
issn = "0093-934X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Novel metaphors appear anomalous at least momentarily

T2 - Evidence from N400

AU - Tartter, Vivien C.

AU - Gomes, Hilary

AU - Dubrovsky, Boris

AU - Molholm, Sophie

AU - Stewart, Rosemarie Vala

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This study addresses a central question in perception of novel figurative language: whether it is interpreted intelligently and figuratively immediately, or only after a literal interpretation fails. Eighty sentence frames that could plausibly end with a literal, truly anomalous, or figurative word were created. After validation for meaningfulness and figurativeness, the 240 sentences were presented to 11 subjects for event related potential (ERP) recording. ERP's first 200 ms is believed to reflect the structuring of the input; the prominence of a dip at around 400 ms (N400) is said to relate inversely to how expected a word is. Results showed no difference between anomalous and metaphoric ERPs in the early window, metaphoric and literal ERPs converging 300-500 ms after the ending, and significant N400s only for anomalous endings. A follow-up study showed that the metaphoric endings were less frequent (in standardized word norms) than were the anomalous and literal endings and that there were significant differences in cloze probabilities (determined from 24 new subjects) among the three ending types: literal > metaphoric > anomalous. It is possible that the low frequency of the metaphoric element and lower cloze probability of the anomalous one contributed to the processes reflected in the early window, while the incongruity and near-zero cloze probability of the anomalous endings produced an N400 effect in them alone. The structure or parse derived for metaphor during the early window appears to yield a preliminary interpretation suggesting anomaly, while semantic analysis reflected in the later window renders a plausible figurative interpretation.

AB - This study addresses a central question in perception of novel figurative language: whether it is interpreted intelligently and figuratively immediately, or only after a literal interpretation fails. Eighty sentence frames that could plausibly end with a literal, truly anomalous, or figurative word were created. After validation for meaningfulness and figurativeness, the 240 sentences were presented to 11 subjects for event related potential (ERP) recording. ERP's first 200 ms is believed to reflect the structuring of the input; the prominence of a dip at around 400 ms (N400) is said to relate inversely to how expected a word is. Results showed no difference between anomalous and metaphoric ERPs in the early window, metaphoric and literal ERPs converging 300-500 ms after the ending, and significant N400s only for anomalous endings. A follow-up study showed that the metaphoric endings were less frequent (in standardized word norms) than were the anomalous and literal endings and that there were significant differences in cloze probabilities (determined from 24 new subjects) among the three ending types: literal > metaphoric > anomalous. It is possible that the low frequency of the metaphoric element and lower cloze probability of the anomalous one contributed to the processes reflected in the early window, while the incongruity and near-zero cloze probability of the anomalous endings produced an N400 effect in them alone. The structure or parse derived for metaphor during the early window appears to yield a preliminary interpretation suggesting anomaly, while semantic analysis reflected in the later window renders a plausible figurative interpretation.

KW - Anomaly

KW - Cloze probability

KW - Figurative language

KW - Metaphor

KW - N400

KW - Selectional restrictions

KW - Semantic processing

KW - Standard pragmatic model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036061755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036061755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/brln.2001.2610

DO - 10.1006/brln.2001.2610

M3 - Article

C2 - 11896654

AN - SCOPUS:0036061755

VL - 80

SP - 488

EP - 509

JO - Brain and Language

JF - Brain and Language

SN - 0093-934X

IS - 3

ER -