Norm and law in the theory of action

Ruth Macklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An examination is made of the dispute between the proponents of rational explanation of actions and of the deductive nomological pattern of explanation. A rapprochement between these two positions is suggested, with the aim of accounting for the normative character of reasons for acting. It is argued that the disputed area is an area of intersection between facts and values, and that far from it being the case that the normative and descriptive components can be separated or isolated, the underlying precepts are to be viewed as both explanatory (descriptive) and normative. The discussion is divided into two general areas: (1) the normative force of reasons for acting; and (2) the normative character of rationality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)400-409
Number of pages10
JournalInquiry
Volume11
Issue number1-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1968
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dissent and Disputes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Norm and law in the theory of action. / Macklin, Ruth.

In: Inquiry, Vol. 11, No. 1-4, 1968, p. 400-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Macklin, Ruth. / Norm and law in the theory of action. In: Inquiry. 1968 ; Vol. 11, No. 1-4. pp. 400-409.
@article{05f6dd0a31994b3eb5dcb8087f0c4b24,
title = "Norm and law in the theory of action",
abstract = "An examination is made of the dispute between the proponents of rational explanation of actions and of the deductive nomological pattern of explanation. A rapprochement between these two positions is suggested, with the aim of accounting for the normative character of reasons for acting. It is argued that the disputed area is an area of intersection between facts and values, and that far from it being the case that the normative and descriptive components can be separated or isolated, the underlying precepts are to be viewed as both explanatory (descriptive) and normative. The discussion is divided into two general areas: (1) the normative force of reasons for acting; and (2) the normative character of rationality.",
author = "Ruth Macklin",
year = "1968",
doi = "10.1080/00201746808601536",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "400--409",
journal = "Inquiry (United Kingdom)",
issn = "0020-174X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Norm and law in the theory of action

AU - Macklin, Ruth

PY - 1968

Y1 - 1968

N2 - An examination is made of the dispute between the proponents of rational explanation of actions and of the deductive nomological pattern of explanation. A rapprochement between these two positions is suggested, with the aim of accounting for the normative character of reasons for acting. It is argued that the disputed area is an area of intersection between facts and values, and that far from it being the case that the normative and descriptive components can be separated or isolated, the underlying precepts are to be viewed as both explanatory (descriptive) and normative. The discussion is divided into two general areas: (1) the normative force of reasons for acting; and (2) the normative character of rationality.

AB - An examination is made of the dispute between the proponents of rational explanation of actions and of the deductive nomological pattern of explanation. A rapprochement between these two positions is suggested, with the aim of accounting for the normative character of reasons for acting. It is argued that the disputed area is an area of intersection between facts and values, and that far from it being the case that the normative and descriptive components can be separated or isolated, the underlying precepts are to be viewed as both explanatory (descriptive) and normative. The discussion is divided into two general areas: (1) the normative force of reasons for acting; and (2) the normative character of rationality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247969636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247969636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00201746808601536

DO - 10.1080/00201746808601536

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34247969636

VL - 11

SP - 400

EP - 409

JO - Inquiry (United Kingdom)

JF - Inquiry (United Kingdom)

SN - 0020-174X

IS - 1-4

ER -