Non-oncologist Physician Knowledge of Radiation Therapy at an Urban Community Hospital

Evan Siau, Hernando Salazar, Jonathan Livergant, Jonathan Klein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is a crucial part of cancer care, but previous work suggests that many non-radiation oncologist physicians are uncomfortable referring for RT. To evaluate training and understanding of RT, the authors sent invitations to complete an online questionnaire to all physicians at a community hospital in Bronx, NY, which asked about oncology training and self-rated and objective knowledge of RT. Out of 247 invited participants, 87 responded (35%). Among responders, 19 were attending physicians (22%) and 66 (76%) were residents. Seventy-two percent of respondents reported caring for > 5 cancer patients in the past month, but 54% reported never referring patients for RT. Sixty-nine percent of respondents stated they received no radiation oncology training in medical school, and 36% reported no general oncology training. Approximately half believed themselves to be “somewhat knowledgeable” about RT indications (48%), benefits (53%), and side effects (55%). Objective assessment mean score was 6.2/12 (median 7) for all respondents; Respondents with internal medicine specialization scored higher than others (mean 7.7 vs 3.5; p < 0.01). Scores did not differ between attending and resident physicians, resident post-graduate levels, or receiving oncology training in medical school. The factors most commonly cited as affecting RT referral decisions were type of cancer, patient wishes, family wishes, poor functional status, and life expectancy. Many physicians are unaware of RT effectiveness or indications, which may affect referral patterns. Previous oncology training was not associated with higher knowledge scores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Cancer Education
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Urban Hospitals
Community Hospital
Radiotherapy
Physicians
Medical Schools
Referral and Consultation
Neoplasms
Radiation Oncology
Internal Medicine
Life Expectancy
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Continuing medical education
  • Graduate medical education
  • Medical education
  • Radiation oncology
  • Resident education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Non-oncologist Physician Knowledge of Radiation Therapy at an Urban Community Hospital. / Siau, Evan; Salazar, Hernando; Livergant, Jonathan; Klein, Jonathan.

In: Journal of Cancer Education, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6719c0f34f434ce19b166782077692b0,
title = "Non-oncologist Physician Knowledge of Radiation Therapy at an Urban Community Hospital",
abstract = "Radiation therapy (RT) is a crucial part of cancer care, but previous work suggests that many non-radiation oncologist physicians are uncomfortable referring for RT. To evaluate training and understanding of RT, the authors sent invitations to complete an online questionnaire to all physicians at a community hospital in Bronx, NY, which asked about oncology training and self-rated and objective knowledge of RT. Out of 247 invited participants, 87 responded (35{\%}). Among responders, 19 were attending physicians (22{\%}) and 66 (76{\%}) were residents. Seventy-two percent of respondents reported caring for > 5 cancer patients in the past month, but 54{\%} reported never referring patients for RT. Sixty-nine percent of respondents stated they received no radiation oncology training in medical school, and 36{\%} reported no general oncology training. Approximately half believed themselves to be “somewhat knowledgeable” about RT indications (48{\%}), benefits (53{\%}), and side effects (55{\%}). Objective assessment mean score was 6.2/12 (median 7) for all respondents; Respondents with internal medicine specialization scored higher than others (mean 7.7 vs 3.5; p < 0.01). Scores did not differ between attending and resident physicians, resident post-graduate levels, or receiving oncology training in medical school. The factors most commonly cited as affecting RT referral decisions were type of cancer, patient wishes, family wishes, poor functional status, and life expectancy. Many physicians are unaware of RT effectiveness or indications, which may affect referral patterns. Previous oncology training was not associated with higher knowledge scores.",
keywords = "Continuing medical education, Graduate medical education, Medical education, Radiation oncology, Resident education",
author = "Evan Siau and Hernando Salazar and Jonathan Livergant and Jonathan Klein",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13187-019-01618-y",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Cancer Education",
issn = "0885-8195",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-oncologist Physician Knowledge of Radiation Therapy at an Urban Community Hospital

AU - Siau, Evan

AU - Salazar, Hernando

AU - Livergant, Jonathan

AU - Klein, Jonathan

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Radiation therapy (RT) is a crucial part of cancer care, but previous work suggests that many non-radiation oncologist physicians are uncomfortable referring for RT. To evaluate training and understanding of RT, the authors sent invitations to complete an online questionnaire to all physicians at a community hospital in Bronx, NY, which asked about oncology training and self-rated and objective knowledge of RT. Out of 247 invited participants, 87 responded (35%). Among responders, 19 were attending physicians (22%) and 66 (76%) were residents. Seventy-two percent of respondents reported caring for > 5 cancer patients in the past month, but 54% reported never referring patients for RT. Sixty-nine percent of respondents stated they received no radiation oncology training in medical school, and 36% reported no general oncology training. Approximately half believed themselves to be “somewhat knowledgeable” about RT indications (48%), benefits (53%), and side effects (55%). Objective assessment mean score was 6.2/12 (median 7) for all respondents; Respondents with internal medicine specialization scored higher than others (mean 7.7 vs 3.5; p < 0.01). Scores did not differ between attending and resident physicians, resident post-graduate levels, or receiving oncology training in medical school. The factors most commonly cited as affecting RT referral decisions were type of cancer, patient wishes, family wishes, poor functional status, and life expectancy. Many physicians are unaware of RT effectiveness or indications, which may affect referral patterns. Previous oncology training was not associated with higher knowledge scores.

AB - Radiation therapy (RT) is a crucial part of cancer care, but previous work suggests that many non-radiation oncologist physicians are uncomfortable referring for RT. To evaluate training and understanding of RT, the authors sent invitations to complete an online questionnaire to all physicians at a community hospital in Bronx, NY, which asked about oncology training and self-rated and objective knowledge of RT. Out of 247 invited participants, 87 responded (35%). Among responders, 19 were attending physicians (22%) and 66 (76%) were residents. Seventy-two percent of respondents reported caring for > 5 cancer patients in the past month, but 54% reported never referring patients for RT. Sixty-nine percent of respondents stated they received no radiation oncology training in medical school, and 36% reported no general oncology training. Approximately half believed themselves to be “somewhat knowledgeable” about RT indications (48%), benefits (53%), and side effects (55%). Objective assessment mean score was 6.2/12 (median 7) for all respondents; Respondents with internal medicine specialization scored higher than others (mean 7.7 vs 3.5; p < 0.01). Scores did not differ between attending and resident physicians, resident post-graduate levels, or receiving oncology training in medical school. The factors most commonly cited as affecting RT referral decisions were type of cancer, patient wishes, family wishes, poor functional status, and life expectancy. Many physicians are unaware of RT effectiveness or indications, which may affect referral patterns. Previous oncology training was not associated with higher knowledge scores.

KW - Continuing medical education

KW - Graduate medical education

KW - Medical education

KW - Radiation oncology

KW - Resident education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074025617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074025617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13187-019-01618-y

DO - 10.1007/s13187-019-01618-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074025617

JO - Journal of Cancer Education

JF - Journal of Cancer Education

SN - 0885-8195

ER -