New dimensions in renal transplant sonography

Applications of 3-dimensional ultrasound

Susan J. Frank, William R. Walter, Larry Latson, Hillel W. Cohen, Mordecai Koenigsberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the usefulness of adding 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound in evaluation of renal transplant vasculature compared to 2-dimensional (2D) Duplex ultrasound. Methods. One hundred thirteen consecutive renal transplant 2D and 3D ultrasound examinations were performed and retrospectively reviewed by 2 board-certified radiologists and a radiology resident individually; each reviewed 2D and then 3D images, including color and spectral Doppler. They recorded ability to visualize the surgical anastomosis and rated visualization on a subjective scale. Interobserver agreement was evaluated. Variant anastomosis anatomy was recorded. Tortuosity or stenosis was evaluated if localized Doppler velocity elevation was present. Results. The reviewers directly visualized the anastomosis more often with 3D ultrasound (x =97.5%) compared with 2D ( x =54.5%) [difference in means (DM) = 43% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 36%-50%) (P < 0.001)]. The reviewers visualized the anastomosis more clearly with 3D ultrasound (P < 0.001) [difference in medians = 0.5, 1.0, and 1.0, (95% CI = 0.5-1.0, 0.5-1.0, and 1.0-1.5)]. Detection of variant anatomy improved with 3D ultrasound by 2 reviewers [DM = 7.1% and 8.9% (95% CI = 1%-13% and 4%-14%, respectively) (P < 0.05)]. There was high interobserver agreement [ x = 95.3%, (95% CI = 91.9%- 98.7%) regarding anastomosis visualization among reviewers with wide-ranging experience. Conclusions. Direct visualization of the entire anastomosis was improved with 3D ultrasound. Three-dimensional evaluation improved detection of anatomic variants and identified tortuosity as the likely cause of borderline localized elevation in Doppler velocity. The data added by 3D ultrasound may obviate confirmatory testing with magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomographic angiography after equivocal 2D ultrasound results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1344-1352
Number of pages9
JournalTransplantation
Volume101
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Ultrasonography
Confidence Intervals
Transplants
Kidney
Anatomy
Surgical Anastomosis
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Radiology
Angiography
Pathologic Constriction
Color

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

New dimensions in renal transplant sonography : Applications of 3-dimensional ultrasound. / Frank, Susan J.; Walter, William R.; Latson, Larry; Cohen, Hillel W.; Koenigsberg, Mordecai.

In: Transplantation, Vol. 101, No. 6, 2017, p. 1344-1352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Frank, Susan J. ; Walter, William R. ; Latson, Larry ; Cohen, Hillel W. ; Koenigsberg, Mordecai. / New dimensions in renal transplant sonography : Applications of 3-dimensional ultrasound. In: Transplantation. 2017 ; Vol. 101, No. 6. pp. 1344-1352.
@article{8ffd0903551c45579800883a876357c9,
title = "New dimensions in renal transplant sonography: Applications of 3-dimensional ultrasound",
abstract = "Background. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the usefulness of adding 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound in evaluation of renal transplant vasculature compared to 2-dimensional (2D) Duplex ultrasound. Methods. One hundred thirteen consecutive renal transplant 2D and 3D ultrasound examinations were performed and retrospectively reviewed by 2 board-certified radiologists and a radiology resident individually; each reviewed 2D and then 3D images, including color and spectral Doppler. They recorded ability to visualize the surgical anastomosis and rated visualization on a subjective scale. Interobserver agreement was evaluated. Variant anastomosis anatomy was recorded. Tortuosity or stenosis was evaluated if localized Doppler velocity elevation was present. Results. The reviewers directly visualized the anastomosis more often with 3D ultrasound (x =97.5{\%}) compared with 2D ( x =54.5{\%}) [difference in means (DM) = 43{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval (CI) = 36{\%}-50{\%}) (P < 0.001)]. The reviewers visualized the anastomosis more clearly with 3D ultrasound (P < 0.001) [difference in medians = 0.5, 1.0, and 1.0, (95{\%} CI = 0.5-1.0, 0.5-1.0, and 1.0-1.5)]. Detection of variant anatomy improved with 3D ultrasound by 2 reviewers [DM = 7.1{\%} and 8.9{\%} (95{\%} CI = 1{\%}-13{\%} and 4{\%}-14{\%}, respectively) (P < 0.05)]. There was high interobserver agreement [ x = 95.3{\%}, (95{\%} CI = 91.9{\%}- 98.7{\%}) regarding anastomosis visualization among reviewers with wide-ranging experience. Conclusions. Direct visualization of the entire anastomosis was improved with 3D ultrasound. Three-dimensional evaluation improved detection of anatomic variants and identified tortuosity as the likely cause of borderline localized elevation in Doppler velocity. The data added by 3D ultrasound may obviate confirmatory testing with magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomographic angiography after equivocal 2D ultrasound results.",
author = "Frank, {Susan J.} and Walter, {William R.} and Larry Latson and Cohen, {Hillel W.} and Mordecai Koenigsberg",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1097/TP.0000000000001206",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "1344--1352",
journal = "Transplantation",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New dimensions in renal transplant sonography

T2 - Applications of 3-dimensional ultrasound

AU - Frank, Susan J.

AU - Walter, William R.

AU - Latson, Larry

AU - Cohen, Hillel W.

AU - Koenigsberg, Mordecai

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the usefulness of adding 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound in evaluation of renal transplant vasculature compared to 2-dimensional (2D) Duplex ultrasound. Methods. One hundred thirteen consecutive renal transplant 2D and 3D ultrasound examinations were performed and retrospectively reviewed by 2 board-certified radiologists and a radiology resident individually; each reviewed 2D and then 3D images, including color and spectral Doppler. They recorded ability to visualize the surgical anastomosis and rated visualization on a subjective scale. Interobserver agreement was evaluated. Variant anastomosis anatomy was recorded. Tortuosity or stenosis was evaluated if localized Doppler velocity elevation was present. Results. The reviewers directly visualized the anastomosis more often with 3D ultrasound (x =97.5%) compared with 2D ( x =54.5%) [difference in means (DM) = 43% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 36%-50%) (P < 0.001)]. The reviewers visualized the anastomosis more clearly with 3D ultrasound (P < 0.001) [difference in medians = 0.5, 1.0, and 1.0, (95% CI = 0.5-1.0, 0.5-1.0, and 1.0-1.5)]. Detection of variant anatomy improved with 3D ultrasound by 2 reviewers [DM = 7.1% and 8.9% (95% CI = 1%-13% and 4%-14%, respectively) (P < 0.05)]. There was high interobserver agreement [ x = 95.3%, (95% CI = 91.9%- 98.7%) regarding anastomosis visualization among reviewers with wide-ranging experience. Conclusions. Direct visualization of the entire anastomosis was improved with 3D ultrasound. Three-dimensional evaluation improved detection of anatomic variants and identified tortuosity as the likely cause of borderline localized elevation in Doppler velocity. The data added by 3D ultrasound may obviate confirmatory testing with magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomographic angiography after equivocal 2D ultrasound results.

AB - Background. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the usefulness of adding 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound in evaluation of renal transplant vasculature compared to 2-dimensional (2D) Duplex ultrasound. Methods. One hundred thirteen consecutive renal transplant 2D and 3D ultrasound examinations were performed and retrospectively reviewed by 2 board-certified radiologists and a radiology resident individually; each reviewed 2D and then 3D images, including color and spectral Doppler. They recorded ability to visualize the surgical anastomosis and rated visualization on a subjective scale. Interobserver agreement was evaluated. Variant anastomosis anatomy was recorded. Tortuosity or stenosis was evaluated if localized Doppler velocity elevation was present. Results. The reviewers directly visualized the anastomosis more often with 3D ultrasound (x =97.5%) compared with 2D ( x =54.5%) [difference in means (DM) = 43% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 36%-50%) (P < 0.001)]. The reviewers visualized the anastomosis more clearly with 3D ultrasound (P < 0.001) [difference in medians = 0.5, 1.0, and 1.0, (95% CI = 0.5-1.0, 0.5-1.0, and 1.0-1.5)]. Detection of variant anatomy improved with 3D ultrasound by 2 reviewers [DM = 7.1% and 8.9% (95% CI = 1%-13% and 4%-14%, respectively) (P < 0.05)]. There was high interobserver agreement [ x = 95.3%, (95% CI = 91.9%- 98.7%) regarding anastomosis visualization among reviewers with wide-ranging experience. Conclusions. Direct visualization of the entire anastomosis was improved with 3D ultrasound. Three-dimensional evaluation improved detection of anatomic variants and identified tortuosity as the likely cause of borderline localized elevation in Doppler velocity. The data added by 3D ultrasound may obviate confirmatory testing with magnetic resonance angiography or computed tomographic angiography after equivocal 2D ultrasound results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020694145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020694145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TP.0000000000001206

DO - 10.1097/TP.0000000000001206

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 1344

EP - 1352

JO - Transplantation

JF - Transplantation

SN - 0041-1337

IS - 6

ER -