Neural representation of probabilities for Bayesian inference

Dylan Rich, Fanny Cazettes, Yunyan Wang, Jose L. Pena, Brian J. Fischer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bayesian models are often successful in describing perception and behavior, but the neural representation of probabilities remains in question. There are several distinct proposals for the neural representation of probabilities, but they have not been directly compared in an example system. Here we consider three models: a non-uniform population code where the stimulus-driven activity and distribution of preferred stimuli in the population represent a likelihood function and a prior, respectively; the sampling hypothesis which proposes that the stimulus-driven activity over time represents a posterior probability and that the spontaneous activity represents a prior; and the class of models which propose that a population of neurons represents a posterior probability in a distributed code. It has been shown that the non-uniform population code model matches the representation of auditory space generated in the owl’s external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx). However, the alternative models have not been tested, nor have the three models been directly compared in any system. Here we tested the three models in the owl’s ICx. We found that spontaneous firing rate and the average stimulus-driven response of these neurons were not consistent with predictions of the sampling hypothesis. We also found that neural activity in ICx under varying levels of sensory noise did not reflect a posterior probability. On the other hand, the responses of ICx neurons were consistent with the non-uniform population code model. We further show that Bayesian inference can be implemented in the non-uniform population code model using one spike per neuron when the population is large and is thus able to support the rapid inference that is necessary for sound localization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-323
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Computational Neuroscience
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Population
Strigiformes
Neurons
Sound Localization
Likelihood Functions
Inferior Colliculi
Noise

Keywords

  • Barn owl
  • Bayesian inference
  • Neural coding
  • Population code
  • Sound localization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Neural representation of probabilities for Bayesian inference. / Rich, Dylan; Cazettes, Fanny; Wang, Yunyan; Pena, Jose L.; Fischer, Brian J.

In: Journal of Computational Neuroscience, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2015, p. 315-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rich, Dylan ; Cazettes, Fanny ; Wang, Yunyan ; Pena, Jose L. ; Fischer, Brian J. / Neural representation of probabilities for Bayesian inference. In: Journal of Computational Neuroscience. 2015 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 315-323.
@article{cda7d80c043b499b92bd23a5af2a37d4,
title = "Neural representation of probabilities for Bayesian inference",
abstract = "Bayesian models are often successful in describing perception and behavior, but the neural representation of probabilities remains in question. There are several distinct proposals for the neural representation of probabilities, but they have not been directly compared in an example system. Here we consider three models: a non-uniform population code where the stimulus-driven activity and distribution of preferred stimuli in the population represent a likelihood function and a prior, respectively; the sampling hypothesis which proposes that the stimulus-driven activity over time represents a posterior probability and that the spontaneous activity represents a prior; and the class of models which propose that a population of neurons represents a posterior probability in a distributed code. It has been shown that the non-uniform population code model matches the representation of auditory space generated in the owl’s external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx). However, the alternative models have not been tested, nor have the three models been directly compared in any system. Here we tested the three models in the owl’s ICx. We found that spontaneous firing rate and the average stimulus-driven response of these neurons were not consistent with predictions of the sampling hypothesis. We also found that neural activity in ICx under varying levels of sensory noise did not reflect a posterior probability. On the other hand, the responses of ICx neurons were consistent with the non-uniform population code model. We further show that Bayesian inference can be implemented in the non-uniform population code model using one spike per neuron when the population is large and is thus able to support the rapid inference that is necessary for sound localization.",
keywords = "Barn owl, Bayesian inference, Neural coding, Population code, Sound localization",
author = "Dylan Rich and Fanny Cazettes and Yunyan Wang and Pena, {Jose L.} and Fischer, {Brian J.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s10827-014-0545-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "315--323",
journal = "Journal of Computational Neuroscience",
issn = "0929-5313",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural representation of probabilities for Bayesian inference

AU - Rich, Dylan

AU - Cazettes, Fanny

AU - Wang, Yunyan

AU - Pena, Jose L.

AU - Fischer, Brian J.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Bayesian models are often successful in describing perception and behavior, but the neural representation of probabilities remains in question. There are several distinct proposals for the neural representation of probabilities, but they have not been directly compared in an example system. Here we consider three models: a non-uniform population code where the stimulus-driven activity and distribution of preferred stimuli in the population represent a likelihood function and a prior, respectively; the sampling hypothesis which proposes that the stimulus-driven activity over time represents a posterior probability and that the spontaneous activity represents a prior; and the class of models which propose that a population of neurons represents a posterior probability in a distributed code. It has been shown that the non-uniform population code model matches the representation of auditory space generated in the owl’s external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx). However, the alternative models have not been tested, nor have the three models been directly compared in any system. Here we tested the three models in the owl’s ICx. We found that spontaneous firing rate and the average stimulus-driven response of these neurons were not consistent with predictions of the sampling hypothesis. We also found that neural activity in ICx under varying levels of sensory noise did not reflect a posterior probability. On the other hand, the responses of ICx neurons were consistent with the non-uniform population code model. We further show that Bayesian inference can be implemented in the non-uniform population code model using one spike per neuron when the population is large and is thus able to support the rapid inference that is necessary for sound localization.

AB - Bayesian models are often successful in describing perception and behavior, but the neural representation of probabilities remains in question. There are several distinct proposals for the neural representation of probabilities, but they have not been directly compared in an example system. Here we consider three models: a non-uniform population code where the stimulus-driven activity and distribution of preferred stimuli in the population represent a likelihood function and a prior, respectively; the sampling hypothesis which proposes that the stimulus-driven activity over time represents a posterior probability and that the spontaneous activity represents a prior; and the class of models which propose that a population of neurons represents a posterior probability in a distributed code. It has been shown that the non-uniform population code model matches the representation of auditory space generated in the owl’s external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx). However, the alternative models have not been tested, nor have the three models been directly compared in any system. Here we tested the three models in the owl’s ICx. We found that spontaneous firing rate and the average stimulus-driven response of these neurons were not consistent with predictions of the sampling hypothesis. We also found that neural activity in ICx under varying levels of sensory noise did not reflect a posterior probability. On the other hand, the responses of ICx neurons were consistent with the non-uniform population code model. We further show that Bayesian inference can be implemented in the non-uniform population code model using one spike per neuron when the population is large and is thus able to support the rapid inference that is necessary for sound localization.

KW - Barn owl

KW - Bayesian inference

KW - Neural coding

KW - Population code

KW - Sound localization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925494474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925494474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10827-014-0545-1

DO - 10.1007/s10827-014-0545-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 25561333

AN - SCOPUS:84925494474

VL - 38

SP - 315

EP - 323

JO - Journal of Computational Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Computational Neuroscience

SN - 0929-5313

IS - 2

ER -