Motor planning poststroke: Impairment in vector-coded reach plans

John Ross Rizzo, Todd E. Hudson, Andrew Abdou, Ira G. Rashbaum, Ajax E. George, Preeti Raghavan, Michael S. Landy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Healthy individuals appear to use both vector-coded reach plans that encode movements in terms of their desired direction and extent, and target-coded reach plans that encode the desired endpoint position of the effector. We examined whether these vector and target reach-planning codes are differentially affected after stroke. Participants with stroke and healthy controls made blocks of reaches that were grouped by target location (providing target-specific practice) and by movement vector (providing vector-specific practice). Reach accuracy was impaired in the more affected arm after stroke, but not distinguishable for target- versus vector-grouped reaches. Reach velocity and acceleration were not only impaired in both the less and more affected arms poststroke, but also not distinguishable for target- versus vector-grouped reaches. As previously reported in controls, target-grouped reaches yielded isotropic (circular) error distributions and vector-grouped reaches yielded error distributions elongated in the direction of the reach. In stroke, the pattern of variability was similar. However, the more affected arm showed less elongated error ellipses for vector-grouped reaches compared to the less affected arm, particularly in individuals with right-hemispheric stroke. The results suggest greater impairment to the vector-coded movement-planning system after stroke, and have implications for the development of personalized approaches to poststroke rehabilitation: Motor learning may be enhanced by practice that uses the preserved code or, conversely, by retraining the more impaired code to restore function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere12650
JournalPhysiological Reports
Volume3
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stroke
Rehabilitation
Learning
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Motor learning
  • Movement planning
  • Reaching
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Rizzo, J. R., Hudson, T. E., Abdou, A., Rashbaum, I. G., George, A. E., Raghavan, P., & Landy, M. S. (2015). Motor planning poststroke: Impairment in vector-coded reach plans. Physiological Reports, 3(12), [e12650]. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12650

Motor planning poststroke : Impairment in vector-coded reach plans. / Rizzo, John Ross; Hudson, Todd E.; Abdou, Andrew; Rashbaum, Ira G.; George, Ajax E.; Raghavan, Preeti; Landy, Michael S.

In: Physiological Reports, Vol. 3, No. 12, e12650, 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rizzo, JR, Hudson, TE, Abdou, A, Rashbaum, IG, George, AE, Raghavan, P & Landy, MS 2015, 'Motor planning poststroke: Impairment in vector-coded reach plans', Physiological Reports, vol. 3, no. 12, e12650. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12650
Rizzo JR, Hudson TE, Abdou A, Rashbaum IG, George AE, Raghavan P et al. Motor planning poststroke: Impairment in vector-coded reach plans. Physiological Reports. 2015 Jan 1;3(12). e12650. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12650
Rizzo, John Ross ; Hudson, Todd E. ; Abdou, Andrew ; Rashbaum, Ira G. ; George, Ajax E. ; Raghavan, Preeti ; Landy, Michael S. / Motor planning poststroke : Impairment in vector-coded reach plans. In: Physiological Reports. 2015 ; Vol. 3, No. 12.
@article{c6a2b1d843b742e3b5a8af0da37ce1b1,
title = "Motor planning poststroke: Impairment in vector-coded reach plans",
abstract = "Healthy individuals appear to use both vector-coded reach plans that encode movements in terms of their desired direction and extent, and target-coded reach plans that encode the desired endpoint position of the effector. We examined whether these vector and target reach-planning codes are differentially affected after stroke. Participants with stroke and healthy controls made blocks of reaches that were grouped by target location (providing target-specific practice) and by movement vector (providing vector-specific practice). Reach accuracy was impaired in the more affected arm after stroke, but not distinguishable for target- versus vector-grouped reaches. Reach velocity and acceleration were not only impaired in both the less and more affected arms poststroke, but also not distinguishable for target- versus vector-grouped reaches. As previously reported in controls, target-grouped reaches yielded isotropic (circular) error distributions and vector-grouped reaches yielded error distributions elongated in the direction of the reach. In stroke, the pattern of variability was similar. However, the more affected arm showed less elongated error ellipses for vector-grouped reaches compared to the less affected arm, particularly in individuals with right-hemispheric stroke. The results suggest greater impairment to the vector-coded movement-planning system after stroke, and have implications for the development of personalized approaches to poststroke rehabilitation: Motor learning may be enhanced by practice that uses the preserved code or, conversely, by retraining the more impaired code to restore function.",
keywords = "Motor learning, Movement planning, Reaching, Stroke",
author = "Rizzo, {John Ross} and Hudson, {Todd E.} and Andrew Abdou and Rashbaum, {Ira G.} and George, {Ajax E.} and Preeti Raghavan and Landy, {Michael S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14814/phy2.12650",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Physiological Reports",
issn = "2051-817X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motor planning poststroke

T2 - Impairment in vector-coded reach plans

AU - Rizzo, John Ross

AU - Hudson, Todd E.

AU - Abdou, Andrew

AU - Rashbaum, Ira G.

AU - George, Ajax E.

AU - Raghavan, Preeti

AU - Landy, Michael S.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Healthy individuals appear to use both vector-coded reach plans that encode movements in terms of their desired direction and extent, and target-coded reach plans that encode the desired endpoint position of the effector. We examined whether these vector and target reach-planning codes are differentially affected after stroke. Participants with stroke and healthy controls made blocks of reaches that were grouped by target location (providing target-specific practice) and by movement vector (providing vector-specific practice). Reach accuracy was impaired in the more affected arm after stroke, but not distinguishable for target- versus vector-grouped reaches. Reach velocity and acceleration were not only impaired in both the less and more affected arms poststroke, but also not distinguishable for target- versus vector-grouped reaches. As previously reported in controls, target-grouped reaches yielded isotropic (circular) error distributions and vector-grouped reaches yielded error distributions elongated in the direction of the reach. In stroke, the pattern of variability was similar. However, the more affected arm showed less elongated error ellipses for vector-grouped reaches compared to the less affected arm, particularly in individuals with right-hemispheric stroke. The results suggest greater impairment to the vector-coded movement-planning system after stroke, and have implications for the development of personalized approaches to poststroke rehabilitation: Motor learning may be enhanced by practice that uses the preserved code or, conversely, by retraining the more impaired code to restore function.

AB - Healthy individuals appear to use both vector-coded reach plans that encode movements in terms of their desired direction and extent, and target-coded reach plans that encode the desired endpoint position of the effector. We examined whether these vector and target reach-planning codes are differentially affected after stroke. Participants with stroke and healthy controls made blocks of reaches that were grouped by target location (providing target-specific practice) and by movement vector (providing vector-specific practice). Reach accuracy was impaired in the more affected arm after stroke, but not distinguishable for target- versus vector-grouped reaches. Reach velocity and acceleration were not only impaired in both the less and more affected arms poststroke, but also not distinguishable for target- versus vector-grouped reaches. As previously reported in controls, target-grouped reaches yielded isotropic (circular) error distributions and vector-grouped reaches yielded error distributions elongated in the direction of the reach. In stroke, the pattern of variability was similar. However, the more affected arm showed less elongated error ellipses for vector-grouped reaches compared to the less affected arm, particularly in individuals with right-hemispheric stroke. The results suggest greater impairment to the vector-coded movement-planning system after stroke, and have implications for the development of personalized approaches to poststroke rehabilitation: Motor learning may be enhanced by practice that uses the preserved code or, conversely, by retraining the more impaired code to restore function.

KW - Motor learning

KW - Movement planning

KW - Reaching

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85005979558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85005979558&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14814/phy2.12650

DO - 10.14814/phy2.12650

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85005979558

VL - 3

JO - Physiological Reports

JF - Physiological Reports

SN - 2051-817X

IS - 12

M1 - e12650

ER -