Motor dual-task effect on gait and task of upper limbs in older adults under specific task prioritization: Pilot study

Mooyeon Oh-Park, Roee Holtzer, Jeannette R. Mahoney, Cuiling Wang, Preeti Raghavan, Joe Verghese

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and aims: Performing multiple tasks simultaneously may result in reduced performance of subtasks (dual-task cost) particularly among old individuals. Subtask performance during dual tasking is also known to be affected by task prioritization. However, it has not been well studied how the performance of subtasks is affected during motor dual task in old adults compared to young when instructed to prioritize one task over the other. This study aims to investigate the dual-task effect on subtasks during motor dual tasking under specific instruction of task prioritization in old compared to young adults. Methods: Sixteen independent old and 18 young adults performed two single tasks (usual walking, holding a tray as steady as possible while standing) and two dual tasks (walking while holding a tray focusing attention on keeping tray as steady as possible - WTAT, and walking while holding tray focusing attention on walking - WTAW). Gait parameters [velocity and variability (coefficient of variation, CV) of stride length] and the pitch (forward-backward) and roll (side-to-side) angles of the tray were measured during the four conditions. Results: During the WTAT compared to single tasks, both young and old groups showed reduced gait velocity (β = -14.0 for old, -34.3 for young), increased gait variability (β = 0.19 for old, 0.51 for young), and increased tray tilt (β = 9.4 for old, 7.9 for young in pitch; β = 8.8 for old, 5.9 for young in roll). Higher proportion of older individuals showed higher dual-task effect on tray stability, but lower dual-task effect on gait compared to young individuals. During WTAW, there was no difference in dual-task effect between age groups in tray stability or gait performance. Conclusions: Compared to young, older adults tend to compromise the task involving upper limbs during motor dual tasking even when instructed to prioritize this task over gait. These findings may have ramifications on developing training strategies to learn or relearn complex motor activities in seniors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-106
Number of pages8
JournalAging clinical and experimental research
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Gait
Upper Extremity
Walking
Young Adult
Motor Activity
Age Groups
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Attention
  • Task performance and analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Motor dual-task effect on gait and task of upper limbs in older adults under specific task prioritization : Pilot study. / Oh-Park, Mooyeon; Holtzer, Roee; Mahoney, Jeannette R.; Wang, Cuiling; Raghavan, Preeti; Verghese, Joe.

In: Aging clinical and experimental research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 04.2013, p. 99-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a6e4cd39bb84b71a18850d928d71671,
title = "Motor dual-task effect on gait and task of upper limbs in older adults under specific task prioritization: Pilot study",
abstract = "Background and aims: Performing multiple tasks simultaneously may result in reduced performance of subtasks (dual-task cost) particularly among old individuals. Subtask performance during dual tasking is also known to be affected by task prioritization. However, it has not been well studied how the performance of subtasks is affected during motor dual task in old adults compared to young when instructed to prioritize one task over the other. This study aims to investigate the dual-task effect on subtasks during motor dual tasking under specific instruction of task prioritization in old compared to young adults. Methods: Sixteen independent old and 18 young adults performed two single tasks (usual walking, holding a tray as steady as possible while standing) and two dual tasks (walking while holding a tray focusing attention on keeping tray as steady as possible - WTAT, and walking while holding tray focusing attention on walking - WTAW). Gait parameters [velocity and variability (coefficient of variation, CV) of stride length] and the pitch (forward-backward) and roll (side-to-side) angles of the tray were measured during the four conditions. Results: During the WTAT compared to single tasks, both young and old groups showed reduced gait velocity (β = -14.0 for old, -34.3 for young), increased gait variability (β = 0.19 for old, 0.51 for young), and increased tray tilt (β = 9.4 for old, 7.9 for young in pitch; β = 8.8 for old, 5.9 for young in roll). Higher proportion of older individuals showed higher dual-task effect on tray stability, but lower dual-task effect on gait compared to young individuals. During WTAW, there was no difference in dual-task effect between age groups in tray stability or gait performance. Conclusions: Compared to young, older adults tend to compromise the task involving upper limbs during motor dual tasking even when instructed to prioritize this task over gait. These findings may have ramifications on developing training strategies to learn or relearn complex motor activities in seniors.",
keywords = "Aged, Attention, Task performance and analysis",
author = "Mooyeon Oh-Park and Roee Holtzer and Mahoney, {Jeannette R.} and Cuiling Wang and Preeti Raghavan and Joe Verghese",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s40520-013-0014-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "99--106",
journal = "Aging",
issn = "1594-0667",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motor dual-task effect on gait and task of upper limbs in older adults under specific task prioritization

T2 - Pilot study

AU - Oh-Park, Mooyeon

AU - Holtzer, Roee

AU - Mahoney, Jeannette R.

AU - Wang, Cuiling

AU - Raghavan, Preeti

AU - Verghese, Joe

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Background and aims: Performing multiple tasks simultaneously may result in reduced performance of subtasks (dual-task cost) particularly among old individuals. Subtask performance during dual tasking is also known to be affected by task prioritization. However, it has not been well studied how the performance of subtasks is affected during motor dual task in old adults compared to young when instructed to prioritize one task over the other. This study aims to investigate the dual-task effect on subtasks during motor dual tasking under specific instruction of task prioritization in old compared to young adults. Methods: Sixteen independent old and 18 young adults performed two single tasks (usual walking, holding a tray as steady as possible while standing) and two dual tasks (walking while holding a tray focusing attention on keeping tray as steady as possible - WTAT, and walking while holding tray focusing attention on walking - WTAW). Gait parameters [velocity and variability (coefficient of variation, CV) of stride length] and the pitch (forward-backward) and roll (side-to-side) angles of the tray were measured during the four conditions. Results: During the WTAT compared to single tasks, both young and old groups showed reduced gait velocity (β = -14.0 for old, -34.3 for young), increased gait variability (β = 0.19 for old, 0.51 for young), and increased tray tilt (β = 9.4 for old, 7.9 for young in pitch; β = 8.8 for old, 5.9 for young in roll). Higher proportion of older individuals showed higher dual-task effect on tray stability, but lower dual-task effect on gait compared to young individuals. During WTAW, there was no difference in dual-task effect between age groups in tray stability or gait performance. Conclusions: Compared to young, older adults tend to compromise the task involving upper limbs during motor dual tasking even when instructed to prioritize this task over gait. These findings may have ramifications on developing training strategies to learn or relearn complex motor activities in seniors.

AB - Background and aims: Performing multiple tasks simultaneously may result in reduced performance of subtasks (dual-task cost) particularly among old individuals. Subtask performance during dual tasking is also known to be affected by task prioritization. However, it has not been well studied how the performance of subtasks is affected during motor dual task in old adults compared to young when instructed to prioritize one task over the other. This study aims to investigate the dual-task effect on subtasks during motor dual tasking under specific instruction of task prioritization in old compared to young adults. Methods: Sixteen independent old and 18 young adults performed two single tasks (usual walking, holding a tray as steady as possible while standing) and two dual tasks (walking while holding a tray focusing attention on keeping tray as steady as possible - WTAT, and walking while holding tray focusing attention on walking - WTAW). Gait parameters [velocity and variability (coefficient of variation, CV) of stride length] and the pitch (forward-backward) and roll (side-to-side) angles of the tray were measured during the four conditions. Results: During the WTAT compared to single tasks, both young and old groups showed reduced gait velocity (β = -14.0 for old, -34.3 for young), increased gait variability (β = 0.19 for old, 0.51 for young), and increased tray tilt (β = 9.4 for old, 7.9 for young in pitch; β = 8.8 for old, 5.9 for young in roll). Higher proportion of older individuals showed higher dual-task effect on tray stability, but lower dual-task effect on gait compared to young individuals. During WTAW, there was no difference in dual-task effect between age groups in tray stability or gait performance. Conclusions: Compared to young, older adults tend to compromise the task involving upper limbs during motor dual tasking even when instructed to prioritize this task over gait. These findings may have ramifications on developing training strategies to learn or relearn complex motor activities in seniors.

KW - Aged

KW - Attention

KW - Task performance and analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887039949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887039949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40520-013-0014-0

DO - 10.1007/s40520-013-0014-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 23740639

AN - SCOPUS:84887039949

VL - 25

SP - 99

EP - 106

JO - Aging

JF - Aging

SN - 1594-0667

IS - 1

ER -