Morphologic Differences of the Endocardial Electrogram in Beats of Sinus and Ventricular Origin

Gordon F. Tomaselli, ANTON P. NIELSEN, WILBUR L. FINKE, LINA SINGUPTA, JOHN G. CLARK, JERRY G. GRIFFIN

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The lack of accurate arrhythmia detection and identification is one of the major obstacles to improvement in the efficacy of antitachycardia devices. We evaluated a method for detection of beats of ventricular origin compared to sinus rhythm based on the morphology of the endocardial electrogram. In order to compare mechanically induced ventricular beats to normal sinus beats, endocardial electrograms from a standard pacing electrode were recorded from eight open‐chested dogs. Time and frequency domain features analyzed included peak‐to‐peak amplitude (AMP), maximal slew rate (dV/dT). and frequency content (‐3 dB downpoint). Quantitative morphologic comparison of the waveforms was performed using standard correlation and by the absolute area of difference between the waveform and a sinus beat template. The AMP and dV/dT for a group of ventricular beats did not differ significantly from beats of sinus origin. In the unipolar configurution ‐3 dB for ventricular beats was significantly different from sinus beats (p = .01), but overlap occurred in three of eight cases. Conversely, using either method of assessment of morphological differences, all ventricular beats could be identified without overlapping the values for normal beats. We concluded that morphologic analysis of the endocardial electrogram by such methods may be a highly accurate means of distinguishing between beats of sinus and ventricular origins. This technique may also be applicable to the problem of automatic rhythm identification by implanted devices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)254-262
Number of pages9
JournalPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Electrodes
Reference Values
Dogs

Keywords

  • antitachycardia devices
  • endocardial electrogram morphology
  • implanted defibriliator
  • pacemakers
  • tachycardia recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Morphologic Differences of the Endocardial Electrogram in Beats of Sinus and Ventricular Origin. / Tomaselli, Gordon F.; NIELSEN, ANTON P.; FINKE, WILBUR L.; SINGUPTA, LINA; CLARK, JOHN G.; GRIFFIN, JERRY G.

In: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 11, No. 3, 01.01.1988, p. 254-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tomaselli, Gordon F. ; NIELSEN, ANTON P. ; FINKE, WILBUR L. ; SINGUPTA, LINA ; CLARK, JOHN G. ; GRIFFIN, JERRY G. / Morphologic Differences of the Endocardial Electrogram in Beats of Sinus and Ventricular Origin. In: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 1988 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 254-262.
@article{a0011701d1ee4a4a915da87579250246,
title = "Morphologic Differences of the Endocardial Electrogram in Beats of Sinus and Ventricular Origin",
abstract = "The lack of accurate arrhythmia detection and identification is one of the major obstacles to improvement in the efficacy of antitachycardia devices. We evaluated a method for detection of beats of ventricular origin compared to sinus rhythm based on the morphology of the endocardial electrogram. In order to compare mechanically induced ventricular beats to normal sinus beats, endocardial electrograms from a standard pacing electrode were recorded from eight open‐chested dogs. Time and frequency domain features analyzed included peak‐to‐peak amplitude (AMP), maximal slew rate (dV/dT). and frequency content (‐3 dB downpoint). Quantitative morphologic comparison of the waveforms was performed using standard correlation and by the absolute area of difference between the waveform and a sinus beat template. The AMP and dV/dT for a group of ventricular beats did not differ significantly from beats of sinus origin. In the unipolar configurution ‐3 dB for ventricular beats was significantly different from sinus beats (p = .01), but overlap occurred in three of eight cases. Conversely, using either method of assessment of morphological differences, all ventricular beats could be identified without overlapping the values for normal beats. We concluded that morphologic analysis of the endocardial electrogram by such methods may be a highly accurate means of distinguishing between beats of sinus and ventricular origins. This technique may also be applicable to the problem of automatic rhythm identification by implanted devices.",
keywords = "antitachycardia devices, endocardial electrogram morphology, implanted defibriliator, pacemakers, tachycardia recognition",
author = "Tomaselli, {Gordon F.} and NIELSEN, {ANTON P.} and FINKE, {WILBUR L.} and LINA SINGUPTA and CLARK, {JOHN G.} and GRIFFIN, {JERRY G.}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb05002.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "254--262",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Morphologic Differences of the Endocardial Electrogram in Beats of Sinus and Ventricular Origin

AU - Tomaselli, Gordon F.

AU - NIELSEN, ANTON P.

AU - FINKE, WILBUR L.

AU - SINGUPTA, LINA

AU - CLARK, JOHN G.

AU - GRIFFIN, JERRY G.

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - The lack of accurate arrhythmia detection and identification is one of the major obstacles to improvement in the efficacy of antitachycardia devices. We evaluated a method for detection of beats of ventricular origin compared to sinus rhythm based on the morphology of the endocardial electrogram. In order to compare mechanically induced ventricular beats to normal sinus beats, endocardial electrograms from a standard pacing electrode were recorded from eight open‐chested dogs. Time and frequency domain features analyzed included peak‐to‐peak amplitude (AMP), maximal slew rate (dV/dT). and frequency content (‐3 dB downpoint). Quantitative morphologic comparison of the waveforms was performed using standard correlation and by the absolute area of difference between the waveform and a sinus beat template. The AMP and dV/dT for a group of ventricular beats did not differ significantly from beats of sinus origin. In the unipolar configurution ‐3 dB for ventricular beats was significantly different from sinus beats (p = .01), but overlap occurred in three of eight cases. Conversely, using either method of assessment of morphological differences, all ventricular beats could be identified without overlapping the values for normal beats. We concluded that morphologic analysis of the endocardial electrogram by such methods may be a highly accurate means of distinguishing between beats of sinus and ventricular origins. This technique may also be applicable to the problem of automatic rhythm identification by implanted devices.

AB - The lack of accurate arrhythmia detection and identification is one of the major obstacles to improvement in the efficacy of antitachycardia devices. We evaluated a method for detection of beats of ventricular origin compared to sinus rhythm based on the morphology of the endocardial electrogram. In order to compare mechanically induced ventricular beats to normal sinus beats, endocardial electrograms from a standard pacing electrode were recorded from eight open‐chested dogs. Time and frequency domain features analyzed included peak‐to‐peak amplitude (AMP), maximal slew rate (dV/dT). and frequency content (‐3 dB downpoint). Quantitative morphologic comparison of the waveforms was performed using standard correlation and by the absolute area of difference between the waveform and a sinus beat template. The AMP and dV/dT for a group of ventricular beats did not differ significantly from beats of sinus origin. In the unipolar configurution ‐3 dB for ventricular beats was significantly different from sinus beats (p = .01), but overlap occurred in three of eight cases. Conversely, using either method of assessment of morphological differences, all ventricular beats could be identified without overlapping the values for normal beats. We concluded that morphologic analysis of the endocardial electrogram by such methods may be a highly accurate means of distinguishing between beats of sinus and ventricular origins. This technique may also be applicable to the problem of automatic rhythm identification by implanted devices.

KW - antitachycardia devices

KW - endocardial electrogram morphology

KW - implanted defibriliator

KW - pacemakers

KW - tachycardia recognition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023857751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023857751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb05002.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb05002.x

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 254

EP - 262

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 3

ER -