Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: A comparison of methods

John Spertus, Eric Peterson, Mark W. Conard, Paul A. Heidenreich, Harlan M. Krumholz, Philip Jones, Peter A. McCullough, Ileana L. Pina, Joseph Tooley, William S. Weintraub, John S. Rumsfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

241 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although monitoring the clinical status of patients with heart failure rests at the core of clinical medicine, the ability of different techniques to reflect clinical change has not been evaluated. This study sought to describe changes in various measures of disease status associated with gradations of clinical change. Methods: A prospective, 14-center cohort of 476 outpatients was assessed at baseline and 6 ± 2 weeks to compare changes in 7 heart failure measures with clinically observed change. Measures included health status instruments (the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ], Short Form-12, and EQ-5D), physician-assessed functional class (New York Heart Association [NYHA]), an exercise test (6-minute walk), patient weight, and a biomarker (B-type natriuretic peptide). Cardiologists, blinded to all measures except weight and NYHA, categorized clinical change ranging from large deterioration to large improvement. Results: The KCCQ, NYHA, and 6-minute walk test were most sensitive to clinical change. For patients with large, moderate, and small deteriorations, the KCCQ decreased by 25 ± 16, 17 ± 14, and 5.3 ± 11 points, respectively. For patients with small, moderate, and large improvements, the KCCQ increased by 5.7 ± 16, 10.5 ± 16, and 22.3 ± 16 points, respectively (P < .01 for all compared with the no change group). New York Heart Association and 6-minute walk distance were significantly different for those with moderate and large changes (P < .05) but neither revealed a difference between those with small versus no clinical deterioration. The KCCQ had the highest c statistic for monitoring individual patients, followed by NYHA and 6-minute walk. Conclusion: The KCCQ, followed by the NYHA and the 6-minute walk test, most accurately reflected clinical change in patients with heart failure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)707-715
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume150
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cardiomyopathies
Heart Failure
Weights and Measures
Brain Natriuretic Peptide
Clinical Medicine
Physiologic Monitoring
Exercise Test
Health Status
Surveys and Questionnaires
Outpatients
Biomarkers
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Spertus, J., Peterson, E., Conard, M. W., Heidenreich, P. A., Krumholz, H. M., Jones, P., ... Rumsfeld, J. S. (2005). Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: A comparison of methods. American Heart Journal, 150(4), 707-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010

Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure : A comparison of methods. / Spertus, John; Peterson, Eric; Conard, Mark W.; Heidenreich, Paul A.; Krumholz, Harlan M.; Jones, Philip; McCullough, Peter A.; Pina, Ileana L.; Tooley, Joseph; Weintraub, William S.; Rumsfeld, John S.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 150, No. 4, 10.2005, p. 707-715.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Spertus, J, Peterson, E, Conard, MW, Heidenreich, PA, Krumholz, HM, Jones, P, McCullough, PA, Pina, IL, Tooley, J, Weintraub, WS & Rumsfeld, JS 2005, 'Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: A comparison of methods', American Heart Journal, vol. 150, no. 4, pp. 707-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010
Spertus J, Peterson E, Conard MW, Heidenreich PA, Krumholz HM, Jones P et al. Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: A comparison of methods. American Heart Journal. 2005 Oct;150(4):707-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010
Spertus, John ; Peterson, Eric ; Conard, Mark W. ; Heidenreich, Paul A. ; Krumholz, Harlan M. ; Jones, Philip ; McCullough, Peter A. ; Pina, Ileana L. ; Tooley, Joseph ; Weintraub, William S. ; Rumsfeld, John S. / Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure : A comparison of methods. In: American Heart Journal. 2005 ; Vol. 150, No. 4. pp. 707-715.
@article{68dcce37e6934ba29bd857f0c2236d70,
title = "Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: A comparison of methods",
abstract = "Background: Although monitoring the clinical status of patients with heart failure rests at the core of clinical medicine, the ability of different techniques to reflect clinical change has not been evaluated. This study sought to describe changes in various measures of disease status associated with gradations of clinical change. Methods: A prospective, 14-center cohort of 476 outpatients was assessed at baseline and 6 ± 2 weeks to compare changes in 7 heart failure measures with clinically observed change. Measures included health status instruments (the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ], Short Form-12, and EQ-5D), physician-assessed functional class (New York Heart Association [NYHA]), an exercise test (6-minute walk), patient weight, and a biomarker (B-type natriuretic peptide). Cardiologists, blinded to all measures except weight and NYHA, categorized clinical change ranging from large deterioration to large improvement. Results: The KCCQ, NYHA, and 6-minute walk test were most sensitive to clinical change. For patients with large, moderate, and small deteriorations, the KCCQ decreased by 25 ± 16, 17 ± 14, and 5.3 ± 11 points, respectively. For patients with small, moderate, and large improvements, the KCCQ increased by 5.7 ± 16, 10.5 ± 16, and 22.3 ± 16 points, respectively (P < .01 for all compared with the no change group). New York Heart Association and 6-minute walk distance were significantly different for those with moderate and large changes (P < .05) but neither revealed a difference between those with small versus no clinical deterioration. The KCCQ had the highest c statistic for monitoring individual patients, followed by NYHA and 6-minute walk. Conclusion: The KCCQ, followed by the NYHA and the 6-minute walk test, most accurately reflected clinical change in patients with heart failure.",
author = "John Spertus and Eric Peterson and Conard, {Mark W.} and Heidenreich, {Paul A.} and Krumholz, {Harlan M.} and Philip Jones and McCullough, {Peter A.} and Pina, {Ileana L.} and Joseph Tooley and Weintraub, {William S.} and Rumsfeld, {John S.}",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "150",
pages = "707--715",
journal = "American Heart Journal",
issn = "0002-8703",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure

T2 - A comparison of methods

AU - Spertus, John

AU - Peterson, Eric

AU - Conard, Mark W.

AU - Heidenreich, Paul A.

AU - Krumholz, Harlan M.

AU - Jones, Philip

AU - McCullough, Peter A.

AU - Pina, Ileana L.

AU - Tooley, Joseph

AU - Weintraub, William S.

AU - Rumsfeld, John S.

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - Background: Although monitoring the clinical status of patients with heart failure rests at the core of clinical medicine, the ability of different techniques to reflect clinical change has not been evaluated. This study sought to describe changes in various measures of disease status associated with gradations of clinical change. Methods: A prospective, 14-center cohort of 476 outpatients was assessed at baseline and 6 ± 2 weeks to compare changes in 7 heart failure measures with clinically observed change. Measures included health status instruments (the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ], Short Form-12, and EQ-5D), physician-assessed functional class (New York Heart Association [NYHA]), an exercise test (6-minute walk), patient weight, and a biomarker (B-type natriuretic peptide). Cardiologists, blinded to all measures except weight and NYHA, categorized clinical change ranging from large deterioration to large improvement. Results: The KCCQ, NYHA, and 6-minute walk test were most sensitive to clinical change. For patients with large, moderate, and small deteriorations, the KCCQ decreased by 25 ± 16, 17 ± 14, and 5.3 ± 11 points, respectively. For patients with small, moderate, and large improvements, the KCCQ increased by 5.7 ± 16, 10.5 ± 16, and 22.3 ± 16 points, respectively (P < .01 for all compared with the no change group). New York Heart Association and 6-minute walk distance were significantly different for those with moderate and large changes (P < .05) but neither revealed a difference between those with small versus no clinical deterioration. The KCCQ had the highest c statistic for monitoring individual patients, followed by NYHA and 6-minute walk. Conclusion: The KCCQ, followed by the NYHA and the 6-minute walk test, most accurately reflected clinical change in patients with heart failure.

AB - Background: Although monitoring the clinical status of patients with heart failure rests at the core of clinical medicine, the ability of different techniques to reflect clinical change has not been evaluated. This study sought to describe changes in various measures of disease status associated with gradations of clinical change. Methods: A prospective, 14-center cohort of 476 outpatients was assessed at baseline and 6 ± 2 weeks to compare changes in 7 heart failure measures with clinically observed change. Measures included health status instruments (the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ], Short Form-12, and EQ-5D), physician-assessed functional class (New York Heart Association [NYHA]), an exercise test (6-minute walk), patient weight, and a biomarker (B-type natriuretic peptide). Cardiologists, blinded to all measures except weight and NYHA, categorized clinical change ranging from large deterioration to large improvement. Results: The KCCQ, NYHA, and 6-minute walk test were most sensitive to clinical change. For patients with large, moderate, and small deteriorations, the KCCQ decreased by 25 ± 16, 17 ± 14, and 5.3 ± 11 points, respectively. For patients with small, moderate, and large improvements, the KCCQ increased by 5.7 ± 16, 10.5 ± 16, and 22.3 ± 16 points, respectively (P < .01 for all compared with the no change group). New York Heart Association and 6-minute walk distance were significantly different for those with moderate and large changes (P < .05) but neither revealed a difference between those with small versus no clinical deterioration. The KCCQ had the highest c statistic for monitoring individual patients, followed by NYHA and 6-minute walk. Conclusion: The KCCQ, followed by the NYHA and the 6-minute walk test, most accurately reflected clinical change in patients with heart failure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25844437142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25844437142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 16209970

AN - SCOPUS:25844437142

VL - 150

SP - 707

EP - 715

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

SN - 0002-8703

IS - 4

ER -