Mobility assessment: Sensitivity and specificity of measurement sets in older adults

Victoria P. Panzer, Dorothy B. Wakefield, Charles B. Hall, Leslie I. Wolfson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To identify quantitative measurement variables that characterize mobility in older adults, meet reliability and validity criteria, distinguish fall risk, and predict future falls. Design: Observational study with 1-year weekly falls follow-up. Setting: Mobility laboratory. Participants: Community-dwelling volunteers (N=74; age, 65-94y) categorized at entry as 27 nonfallers or 47 fallers by using Medicare criteria (1 injury fall or >1 noninjury fall in the previous year). Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Test-retest and within-subject reliability, criterion and concurrent validity; predictive ability indicated by observed sensitivity and specificity to entry fall-risk group (falls status), Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA), computerized dynamic posturography Sensory Organization Test (SOT), and subsequent falls reported weekly. Results: Measurement variables were selected that met reliability (intraclass coefficient of correlation >.6) and/or discrimination (P<.01) criteria (clinical variables: turn steps and time, gait velocity, step-in-tub time, downstairs time; forceplate variables: quiet standing Romberg ratio sway area, maximal lean anterior-posterior excursion, sit-to-stand medial-lateral excursion, sway area). Sets were created (3 clinical, 2 forceplate) using combinations of variables appropriate for older adults with different functional activity levels, and composite scores were calculated. Scores identified entry falls status and concurred with POMA and SOT scores. The full clinical set (5 measurement variables) produced sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 74% to falls status. Composite scores were more sensitive and specific overall in predicting subsequent injury falls and multiple falls compared with falls status and POMA or SOT score. Conclusions: Sets of quantitative measurement variables obtained with this mobility battery provided sensitive prediction of future injury falls and screening for multiple subsequent falls by using tasks that should be appropriate to diverse participants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)905-912
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume92
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Sensitivity and Specificity
Independent Living
Multiple Trauma
Wounds and Injuries
Medicare
Gait
Reproducibility of Results
Observational Studies
Volunteers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Elderly
  • Geriatric assessment
  • Mobility limitations
  • Outcome measures
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Mobility assessment : Sensitivity and specificity of measurement sets in older adults. / Panzer, Victoria P.; Wakefield, Dorothy B.; Hall, Charles B.; Wolfson, Leslie I.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 92, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 905-912.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Panzer, Victoria P. ; Wakefield, Dorothy B. ; Hall, Charles B. ; Wolfson, Leslie I. / Mobility assessment : Sensitivity and specificity of measurement sets in older adults. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2011 ; Vol. 92, No. 6. pp. 905-912.
@article{2717dc1ea95542edbec006ad1461f0ee,
title = "Mobility assessment: Sensitivity and specificity of measurement sets in older adults",
abstract = "Objective: To identify quantitative measurement variables that characterize mobility in older adults, meet reliability and validity criteria, distinguish fall risk, and predict future falls. Design: Observational study with 1-year weekly falls follow-up. Setting: Mobility laboratory. Participants: Community-dwelling volunteers (N=74; age, 65-94y) categorized at entry as 27 nonfallers or 47 fallers by using Medicare criteria (1 injury fall or >1 noninjury fall in the previous year). Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Test-retest and within-subject reliability, criterion and concurrent validity; predictive ability indicated by observed sensitivity and specificity to entry fall-risk group (falls status), Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA), computerized dynamic posturography Sensory Organization Test (SOT), and subsequent falls reported weekly. Results: Measurement variables were selected that met reliability (intraclass coefficient of correlation >.6) and/or discrimination (P<.01) criteria (clinical variables: turn steps and time, gait velocity, step-in-tub time, downstairs time; forceplate variables: quiet standing Romberg ratio sway area, maximal lean anterior-posterior excursion, sit-to-stand medial-lateral excursion, sway area). Sets were created (3 clinical, 2 forceplate) using combinations of variables appropriate for older adults with different functional activity levels, and composite scores were calculated. Scores identified entry falls status and concurred with POMA and SOT scores. The full clinical set (5 measurement variables) produced sensitivity of 80{\%} and specificity of 74{\%} to falls status. Composite scores were more sensitive and specific overall in predicting subsequent injury falls and multiple falls compared with falls status and POMA or SOT score. Conclusions: Sets of quantitative measurement variables obtained with this mobility battery provided sensitive prediction of future injury falls and screening for multiple subsequent falls by using tasks that should be appropriate to diverse participants.",
keywords = "Elderly, Geriatric assessment, Mobility limitations, Outcome measures, Rehabilitation",
author = "Panzer, {Victoria P.} and Wakefield, {Dorothy B.} and Hall, {Charles B.} and Wolfson, {Leslie I.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "905--912",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mobility assessment

T2 - Sensitivity and specificity of measurement sets in older adults

AU - Panzer, Victoria P.

AU - Wakefield, Dorothy B.

AU - Hall, Charles B.

AU - Wolfson, Leslie I.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Objective: To identify quantitative measurement variables that characterize mobility in older adults, meet reliability and validity criteria, distinguish fall risk, and predict future falls. Design: Observational study with 1-year weekly falls follow-up. Setting: Mobility laboratory. Participants: Community-dwelling volunteers (N=74; age, 65-94y) categorized at entry as 27 nonfallers or 47 fallers by using Medicare criteria (1 injury fall or >1 noninjury fall in the previous year). Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Test-retest and within-subject reliability, criterion and concurrent validity; predictive ability indicated by observed sensitivity and specificity to entry fall-risk group (falls status), Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA), computerized dynamic posturography Sensory Organization Test (SOT), and subsequent falls reported weekly. Results: Measurement variables were selected that met reliability (intraclass coefficient of correlation >.6) and/or discrimination (P<.01) criteria (clinical variables: turn steps and time, gait velocity, step-in-tub time, downstairs time; forceplate variables: quiet standing Romberg ratio sway area, maximal lean anterior-posterior excursion, sit-to-stand medial-lateral excursion, sway area). Sets were created (3 clinical, 2 forceplate) using combinations of variables appropriate for older adults with different functional activity levels, and composite scores were calculated. Scores identified entry falls status and concurred with POMA and SOT scores. The full clinical set (5 measurement variables) produced sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 74% to falls status. Composite scores were more sensitive and specific overall in predicting subsequent injury falls and multiple falls compared with falls status and POMA or SOT score. Conclusions: Sets of quantitative measurement variables obtained with this mobility battery provided sensitive prediction of future injury falls and screening for multiple subsequent falls by using tasks that should be appropriate to diverse participants.

AB - Objective: To identify quantitative measurement variables that characterize mobility in older adults, meet reliability and validity criteria, distinguish fall risk, and predict future falls. Design: Observational study with 1-year weekly falls follow-up. Setting: Mobility laboratory. Participants: Community-dwelling volunteers (N=74; age, 65-94y) categorized at entry as 27 nonfallers or 47 fallers by using Medicare criteria (1 injury fall or >1 noninjury fall in the previous year). Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Test-retest and within-subject reliability, criterion and concurrent validity; predictive ability indicated by observed sensitivity and specificity to entry fall-risk group (falls status), Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA), computerized dynamic posturography Sensory Organization Test (SOT), and subsequent falls reported weekly. Results: Measurement variables were selected that met reliability (intraclass coefficient of correlation >.6) and/or discrimination (P<.01) criteria (clinical variables: turn steps and time, gait velocity, step-in-tub time, downstairs time; forceplate variables: quiet standing Romberg ratio sway area, maximal lean anterior-posterior excursion, sit-to-stand medial-lateral excursion, sway area). Sets were created (3 clinical, 2 forceplate) using combinations of variables appropriate for older adults with different functional activity levels, and composite scores were calculated. Scores identified entry falls status and concurred with POMA and SOT scores. The full clinical set (5 measurement variables) produced sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 74% to falls status. Composite scores were more sensitive and specific overall in predicting subsequent injury falls and multiple falls compared with falls status and POMA or SOT score. Conclusions: Sets of quantitative measurement variables obtained with this mobility battery provided sensitive prediction of future injury falls and screening for multiple subsequent falls by using tasks that should be appropriate to diverse participants.

KW - Elderly

KW - Geriatric assessment

KW - Mobility limitations

KW - Outcome measures

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957634712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957634712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 21621667

AN - SCOPUS:79957634712

VL - 92

SP - 905

EP - 912

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 6

ER -