Missed Acute Appendicitis on Multidetector Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Legal Ramifications, Challenges, and Avoidance Strategies

Eitan Sosner, Michael N. Patlas, Victoria Chernyak, Abraham H. Dachman, Douglas S. Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The failure to diagnose acute appendicitis (AA) is the third most common medical malpractice allegation related to gastrointestinal disease. There is a paucity of detailed data on this topic; however, publications by Whang et al and by Berlin and Berlin, which analyzed all types of malpractice suits against radiologists, have shown that the incidence of litigation has increased over time in the United States. This is likely true for cases of AA as well. The misinterpretation of cross-sectional imaging in patients with suspected appendicitis may be caused by suboptimal technique, errors of omission, i.e, missing key findings, failure to review a portion of the examination, and satisfaction of search error. This article summarizes the published legal, clinical, and imaging literature regarding litigation in cases of missed AA, and reviews optimized multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging protocols for the diagnosis of AA, with examples shown of challenging cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCurrent Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Multidetector Computed Tomography
Appendicitis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Malpractice
Jurisprudence
Berlin
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Publications
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{6764a42cf14645a49b569c7f076ee6e3,
title = "Missed Acute Appendicitis on Multidetector Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Legal Ramifications, Challenges, and Avoidance Strategies",
abstract = "The failure to diagnose acute appendicitis (AA) is the third most common medical malpractice allegation related to gastrointestinal disease. There is a paucity of detailed data on this topic; however, publications by Whang et al and by Berlin and Berlin, which analyzed all types of malpractice suits against radiologists, have shown that the incidence of litigation has increased over time in the United States. This is likely true for cases of AA as well. The misinterpretation of cross-sectional imaging in patients with suspected appendicitis may be caused by suboptimal technique, errors of omission, i.e, missing key findings, failure to review a portion of the examination, and satisfaction of search error. This article summarizes the published legal, clinical, and imaging literature regarding litigation in cases of missed AA, and reviews optimized multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging protocols for the diagnosis of AA, with examples shown of challenging cases.",
author = "Eitan Sosner and Patlas, {Michael N.} and Victoria Chernyak and Dachman, {Abraham H.} and Katz, {Douglas S.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology",
issn = "0363-0188",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missed Acute Appendicitis on Multidetector Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

T2 - Legal Ramifications, Challenges, and Avoidance Strategies

AU - Sosner, Eitan

AU - Patlas, Michael N.

AU - Chernyak, Victoria

AU - Dachman, Abraham H.

AU - Katz, Douglas S.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The failure to diagnose acute appendicitis (AA) is the third most common medical malpractice allegation related to gastrointestinal disease. There is a paucity of detailed data on this topic; however, publications by Whang et al and by Berlin and Berlin, which analyzed all types of malpractice suits against radiologists, have shown that the incidence of litigation has increased over time in the United States. This is likely true for cases of AA as well. The misinterpretation of cross-sectional imaging in patients with suspected appendicitis may be caused by suboptimal technique, errors of omission, i.e, missing key findings, failure to review a portion of the examination, and satisfaction of search error. This article summarizes the published legal, clinical, and imaging literature regarding litigation in cases of missed AA, and reviews optimized multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging protocols for the diagnosis of AA, with examples shown of challenging cases.

AB - The failure to diagnose acute appendicitis (AA) is the third most common medical malpractice allegation related to gastrointestinal disease. There is a paucity of detailed data on this topic; however, publications by Whang et al and by Berlin and Berlin, which analyzed all types of malpractice suits against radiologists, have shown that the incidence of litigation has increased over time in the United States. This is likely true for cases of AA as well. The misinterpretation of cross-sectional imaging in patients with suspected appendicitis may be caused by suboptimal technique, errors of omission, i.e, missing key findings, failure to review a portion of the examination, and satisfaction of search error. This article summarizes the published legal, clinical, and imaging literature regarding litigation in cases of missed AA, and reviews optimized multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging protocols for the diagnosis of AA, with examples shown of challenging cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018431741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018431741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.03.003

DO - 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.03.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 28476341

AN - SCOPUS:85018431741

JO - Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology

JF - Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology

SN - 0363-0188

ER -