Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Evolution and review

Erin Schumer, Kyle Perry, W. Scott Melvin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Esophageal cancer remains one of the most deadly cancers with a low overall 5-year survival rate of 17%. Surgical options for esophageal cancer are varied, and debate exists on the best option. The literature was searched for articles discussing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared with open esophagectomy (OE), and articles were chosen at the discretion of the authors. Several studies have shown that MIE has a statistically significant rate of decreased blood loss, increased length of operative time, shorter hospital stay, and overall decreased morbidity. Anastomotic leak, stricture rate, and survival benefit have also been demonstrated to be similar between OE and MIE. As is made apparent by the small amount of literature on MIE, further research must be done to determine outcomes. Although it is likely that MIE does offer benefits when compared with open surgery, it has not been shown in any large-scale comparative studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)383-386
Number of pages4
JournalSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Esophagectomy
Esophageal Neoplasms
Survival Rate
Anastomotic Leak
Operative Time
Length of Stay
Pathologic Constriction
Morbidity
Research
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • esophageal cancer
  • esophagectomy
  • laparoscopic esophagectomy
  • minimally invasive esophagectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer : Evolution and review. / Schumer, Erin; Perry, Kyle; Melvin, W. Scott.

In: Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques, Vol. 22, No. 5, 10.2012, p. 383-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d87e90483d844e4892c83f125a249355,
title = "Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Evolution and review",
abstract = "Esophageal cancer remains one of the most deadly cancers with a low overall 5-year survival rate of 17{\%}. Surgical options for esophageal cancer are varied, and debate exists on the best option. The literature was searched for articles discussing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared with open esophagectomy (OE), and articles were chosen at the discretion of the authors. Several studies have shown that MIE has a statistically significant rate of decreased blood loss, increased length of operative time, shorter hospital stay, and overall decreased morbidity. Anastomotic leak, stricture rate, and survival benefit have also been demonstrated to be similar between OE and MIE. As is made apparent by the small amount of literature on MIE, further research must be done to determine outcomes. Although it is likely that MIE does offer benefits when compared with open surgery, it has not been shown in any large-scale comparative studies.",
keywords = "esophageal cancer, esophagectomy, laparoscopic esophagectomy, minimally invasive esophagectomy",
author = "Erin Schumer and Kyle Perry and Melvin, {W. Scott}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/SLE.0b013e31826295a4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "383--386",
journal = "Surgical Laparoscopy and Endoscopy",
issn = "1530-4515",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

T2 - Evolution and review

AU - Schumer, Erin

AU - Perry, Kyle

AU - Melvin, W. Scott

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Esophageal cancer remains one of the most deadly cancers with a low overall 5-year survival rate of 17%. Surgical options for esophageal cancer are varied, and debate exists on the best option. The literature was searched for articles discussing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared with open esophagectomy (OE), and articles were chosen at the discretion of the authors. Several studies have shown that MIE has a statistically significant rate of decreased blood loss, increased length of operative time, shorter hospital stay, and overall decreased morbidity. Anastomotic leak, stricture rate, and survival benefit have also been demonstrated to be similar between OE and MIE. As is made apparent by the small amount of literature on MIE, further research must be done to determine outcomes. Although it is likely that MIE does offer benefits when compared with open surgery, it has not been shown in any large-scale comparative studies.

AB - Esophageal cancer remains one of the most deadly cancers with a low overall 5-year survival rate of 17%. Surgical options for esophageal cancer are varied, and debate exists on the best option. The literature was searched for articles discussing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared with open esophagectomy (OE), and articles were chosen at the discretion of the authors. Several studies have shown that MIE has a statistically significant rate of decreased blood loss, increased length of operative time, shorter hospital stay, and overall decreased morbidity. Anastomotic leak, stricture rate, and survival benefit have also been demonstrated to be similar between OE and MIE. As is made apparent by the small amount of literature on MIE, further research must be done to determine outcomes. Although it is likely that MIE does offer benefits when compared with open surgery, it has not been shown in any large-scale comparative studies.

KW - esophageal cancer

KW - esophagectomy

KW - laparoscopic esophagectomy

KW - minimally invasive esophagectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867882440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867882440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31826295a4

DO - 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31826295a4

M3 - Article

C2 - 23047377

AN - SCOPUS:84867882440

VL - 22

SP - 383

EP - 386

JO - Surgical Laparoscopy and Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Laparoscopy and Endoscopy

SN - 1530-4515

IS - 5

ER -