Microsurgical breast reconstruction in thin patients: The impact of low body mass indices

Katie E. Weichman, Neil Tanna, P. Niclas Broer, Stelios Wilson, Hamdan Azhar, Nolan S. Karp, Mihye Choi, Christina Y. Ahn, Jamie P. Levine, Robert J. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract Background The purpose of this investigation was to examine patients with low body mass index (BMI) regarding the feasibility to perform autologous breast reconstruction in such patients, as well as to determine optimal donor sites and evaluate outcomes accordingly. Patients and Methods All patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction were divided into three cohorts based on BMI. Group 1 included patients with BMI greater than or equal to 22 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and was defined "low-normal BMI." Patients with BMI 22 to 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were placed in Group 2, labeled as "high-normal BMI." Group 3, defined as "overweight," included patients with BMI greater than 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, but less than 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Patients were then analyzed based on demographics, breast cancer history, intraoperative details, complications, and revisionary surgeries. F-tests, chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, and Freeman-Halton extension of the Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. Results During the study period, a total of 259 reconstructions were performed. Group 1 included 30 patients (n = 49 flaps), Group 2 included 58 patients (n = 98 flaps), and Group 3 included 69 patients (n = 112 flaps). Patients undergoing nipple-areolar sparing mastectomy were more likely to be in Groups 1 (39% [n = 19]) and 2 (37% [n = 37]) as compared with Group 3 (14.2% [n = 16]) (p < 0.001) as compared with the overweight cohort. Patients with increasing BMI were more likely to undergo abdominally based free flaps as compared with alternative donor sites (Group 1 = 2.26, Group 2 = 7.9, Group 3 = 27 [p < 0.001]). Conclusions Abdominally based free flaps are possible in the majority of patients, however alternative harvest sites have to be used more frequently in low BMI patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)20-25
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mammaplasty
Body Mass Index
Free Tissue Flaps
Tissue Donors
Nipples
Mastectomy
Intraoperative Complications
Chi-Square Distribution

Keywords

  • breast reconstruction
  • low BMI
  • thin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Microsurgical breast reconstruction in thin patients : The impact of low body mass indices. / Weichman, Katie E.; Tanna, Neil; Broer, P. Niclas; Wilson, Stelios; Azhar, Hamdan; Karp, Nolan S.; Choi, Mihye; Ahn, Christina Y.; Levine, Jamie P.; Allen, Robert J.

In: Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 20-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weichman, KE, Tanna, N, Broer, PN, Wilson, S, Azhar, H, Karp, NS, Choi, M, Ahn, CY, Levine, JP & Allen, RJ 2015, 'Microsurgical breast reconstruction in thin patients: The impact of low body mass indices', Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 20-25. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1376398
Weichman, Katie E. ; Tanna, Neil ; Broer, P. Niclas ; Wilson, Stelios ; Azhar, Hamdan ; Karp, Nolan S. ; Choi, Mihye ; Ahn, Christina Y. ; Levine, Jamie P. ; Allen, Robert J. / Microsurgical breast reconstruction in thin patients : The impact of low body mass indices. In: Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 2015 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 20-25.
@article{64e4cd4d94cf46cb97af09e504fe1287,
title = "Microsurgical breast reconstruction in thin patients: The impact of low body mass indices",
abstract = "Abstract Background The purpose of this investigation was to examine patients with low body mass index (BMI) regarding the feasibility to perform autologous breast reconstruction in such patients, as well as to determine optimal donor sites and evaluate outcomes accordingly. Patients and Methods All patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction were divided into three cohorts based on BMI. Group 1 included patients with BMI greater than or equal to 22 kg/m2 and was defined {"}low-normal BMI.{"} Patients with BMI 22 to 25 kg/m2 were placed in Group 2, labeled as {"}high-normal BMI.{"} Group 3, defined as {"}overweight,{"} included patients with BMI greater than 25 kg/m2, but less than 30 kg/m2. Patients were then analyzed based on demographics, breast cancer history, intraoperative details, complications, and revisionary surgeries. F-tests, chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, and Freeman-Halton extension of the Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. Results During the study period, a total of 259 reconstructions were performed. Group 1 included 30 patients (n = 49 flaps), Group 2 included 58 patients (n = 98 flaps), and Group 3 included 69 patients (n = 112 flaps). Patients undergoing nipple-areolar sparing mastectomy were more likely to be in Groups 1 (39{\%} [n = 19]) and 2 (37{\%} [n = 37]) as compared with Group 3 (14.2{\%} [n = 16]) (p < 0.001) as compared with the overweight cohort. Patients with increasing BMI were more likely to undergo abdominally based free flaps as compared with alternative donor sites (Group 1 = 2.26, Group 2 = 7.9, Group 3 = 27 [p < 0.001]). Conclusions Abdominally based free flaps are possible in the majority of patients, however alternative harvest sites have to be used more frequently in low BMI patients.",
keywords = "breast reconstruction, low BMI, thin",
author = "Weichman, {Katie E.} and Neil Tanna and Broer, {P. Niclas} and Stelios Wilson and Hamdan Azhar and Karp, {Nolan S.} and Mihye Choi and Ahn, {Christina Y.} and Levine, {Jamie P.} and Allen, {Robert J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0034-1376398",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "20--25",
journal = "Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery",
issn = "0743-684X",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microsurgical breast reconstruction in thin patients

T2 - The impact of low body mass indices

AU - Weichman, Katie E.

AU - Tanna, Neil

AU - Broer, P. Niclas

AU - Wilson, Stelios

AU - Azhar, Hamdan

AU - Karp, Nolan S.

AU - Choi, Mihye

AU - Ahn, Christina Y.

AU - Levine, Jamie P.

AU - Allen, Robert J.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Abstract Background The purpose of this investigation was to examine patients with low body mass index (BMI) regarding the feasibility to perform autologous breast reconstruction in such patients, as well as to determine optimal donor sites and evaluate outcomes accordingly. Patients and Methods All patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction were divided into three cohorts based on BMI. Group 1 included patients with BMI greater than or equal to 22 kg/m2 and was defined "low-normal BMI." Patients with BMI 22 to 25 kg/m2 were placed in Group 2, labeled as "high-normal BMI." Group 3, defined as "overweight," included patients with BMI greater than 25 kg/m2, but less than 30 kg/m2. Patients were then analyzed based on demographics, breast cancer history, intraoperative details, complications, and revisionary surgeries. F-tests, chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, and Freeman-Halton extension of the Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. Results During the study period, a total of 259 reconstructions were performed. Group 1 included 30 patients (n = 49 flaps), Group 2 included 58 patients (n = 98 flaps), and Group 3 included 69 patients (n = 112 flaps). Patients undergoing nipple-areolar sparing mastectomy were more likely to be in Groups 1 (39% [n = 19]) and 2 (37% [n = 37]) as compared with Group 3 (14.2% [n = 16]) (p < 0.001) as compared with the overweight cohort. Patients with increasing BMI were more likely to undergo abdominally based free flaps as compared with alternative donor sites (Group 1 = 2.26, Group 2 = 7.9, Group 3 = 27 [p < 0.001]). Conclusions Abdominally based free flaps are possible in the majority of patients, however alternative harvest sites have to be used more frequently in low BMI patients.

AB - Abstract Background The purpose of this investigation was to examine patients with low body mass index (BMI) regarding the feasibility to perform autologous breast reconstruction in such patients, as well as to determine optimal donor sites and evaluate outcomes accordingly. Patients and Methods All patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction were divided into three cohorts based on BMI. Group 1 included patients with BMI greater than or equal to 22 kg/m2 and was defined "low-normal BMI." Patients with BMI 22 to 25 kg/m2 were placed in Group 2, labeled as "high-normal BMI." Group 3, defined as "overweight," included patients with BMI greater than 25 kg/m2, but less than 30 kg/m2. Patients were then analyzed based on demographics, breast cancer history, intraoperative details, complications, and revisionary surgeries. F-tests, chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, and Freeman-Halton extension of the Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. Results During the study period, a total of 259 reconstructions were performed. Group 1 included 30 patients (n = 49 flaps), Group 2 included 58 patients (n = 98 flaps), and Group 3 included 69 patients (n = 112 flaps). Patients undergoing nipple-areolar sparing mastectomy were more likely to be in Groups 1 (39% [n = 19]) and 2 (37% [n = 37]) as compared with Group 3 (14.2% [n = 16]) (p < 0.001) as compared with the overweight cohort. Patients with increasing BMI were more likely to undergo abdominally based free flaps as compared with alternative donor sites (Group 1 = 2.26, Group 2 = 7.9, Group 3 = 27 [p < 0.001]). Conclusions Abdominally based free flaps are possible in the majority of patients, however alternative harvest sites have to be used more frequently in low BMI patients.

KW - breast reconstruction

KW - low BMI

KW - thin

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928940447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928940447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0034-1376398

DO - 10.1055/s-0034-1376398

M3 - Article

C2 - 24911411

AN - SCOPUS:84928940447

VL - 31

SP - 20

EP - 25

JO - Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery

JF - Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery

SN - 0743-684X

IS - 1

ER -