Medical and nonmedical models in clinical practice and training

M. Radomisli, T. B. Karasu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The use of the medical model to deal with psychologic dysfunction is highly controversial. Some mental health professionals champion the exclusive use of medical and others the exclusive use of nonmedical models to describe, understand, and modify psychopathology. Proposals have been advanced to restrict the scope of psychiatry to conditions that best fit the medical model (schizophrenia, affective disorders, and perhaps psychoneuroses), and to leave the treatment of other conditions to other mental health professionals. All mental health professions, however, encounter a wide range of phenomena that, in order to be understood, require both anatomical/physiologic and psychologic/behavioral viewpoints. There viewpoints belong to two different universes of discourse, and their languages are not mutually; the discovery of a clinically useful metatheory or paradigm, claims made for systems analysis to the contrary, does not appear imminent. At present, both medical and nonmedical models are necessary in clinical practice and training, and neither model is sufficient by itself.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-124
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychotherapy
Volume31
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1977

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Health Occupations
Neurotic Disorders
Systems Analysis
Psychopathology
Mood Disorders
Psychiatry
Schizophrenia
Language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Medical and nonmedical models in clinical practice and training. / Radomisli, M.; Karasu, T. B.

In: American Journal of Psychotherapy, Vol. 31, No. 1, 1977, p. 116-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Radomisli, M & Karasu, TB 1977, 'Medical and nonmedical models in clinical practice and training', American Journal of Psychotherapy, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 116-124.
Radomisli, M. ; Karasu, T. B. / Medical and nonmedical models in clinical practice and training. In: American Journal of Psychotherapy. 1977 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 116-124.
@article{024ad60984d1473286a4228fe4b764f0,
title = "Medical and nonmedical models in clinical practice and training",
abstract = "The use of the medical model to deal with psychologic dysfunction is highly controversial. Some mental health professionals champion the exclusive use of medical and others the exclusive use of nonmedical models to describe, understand, and modify psychopathology. Proposals have been advanced to restrict the scope of psychiatry to conditions that best fit the medical model (schizophrenia, affective disorders, and perhaps psychoneuroses), and to leave the treatment of other conditions to other mental health professionals. All mental health professions, however, encounter a wide range of phenomena that, in order to be understood, require both anatomical/physiologic and psychologic/behavioral viewpoints. There viewpoints belong to two different universes of discourse, and their languages are not mutually; the discovery of a clinically useful metatheory or paradigm, claims made for systems analysis to the contrary, does not appear imminent. At present, both medical and nonmedical models are necessary in clinical practice and training, and neither model is sufficient by itself.",
author = "M. Radomisli and Karasu, {T. B.}",
year = "1977",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "116--124",
journal = "American Journal of Psychotherapy",
issn = "0002-9564",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical and nonmedical models in clinical practice and training

AU - Radomisli, M.

AU - Karasu, T. B.

PY - 1977

Y1 - 1977

N2 - The use of the medical model to deal with psychologic dysfunction is highly controversial. Some mental health professionals champion the exclusive use of medical and others the exclusive use of nonmedical models to describe, understand, and modify psychopathology. Proposals have been advanced to restrict the scope of psychiatry to conditions that best fit the medical model (schizophrenia, affective disorders, and perhaps psychoneuroses), and to leave the treatment of other conditions to other mental health professionals. All mental health professions, however, encounter a wide range of phenomena that, in order to be understood, require both anatomical/physiologic and psychologic/behavioral viewpoints. There viewpoints belong to two different universes of discourse, and their languages are not mutually; the discovery of a clinically useful metatheory or paradigm, claims made for systems analysis to the contrary, does not appear imminent. At present, both medical and nonmedical models are necessary in clinical practice and training, and neither model is sufficient by itself.

AB - The use of the medical model to deal with psychologic dysfunction is highly controversial. Some mental health professionals champion the exclusive use of medical and others the exclusive use of nonmedical models to describe, understand, and modify psychopathology. Proposals have been advanced to restrict the scope of psychiatry to conditions that best fit the medical model (schizophrenia, affective disorders, and perhaps psychoneuroses), and to leave the treatment of other conditions to other mental health professionals. All mental health professions, however, encounter a wide range of phenomena that, in order to be understood, require both anatomical/physiologic and psychologic/behavioral viewpoints. There viewpoints belong to two different universes of discourse, and their languages are not mutually; the discovery of a clinically useful metatheory or paradigm, claims made for systems analysis to the contrary, does not appear imminent. At present, both medical and nonmedical models are necessary in clinical practice and training, and neither model is sufficient by itself.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017332212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017332212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 848607

AN - SCOPUS:0017332212

VL - 31

SP - 116

EP - 124

JO - American Journal of Psychotherapy

JF - American Journal of Psychotherapy

SN - 0002-9564

IS - 1

ER -