Mechanical bridge to decision

What are the options for the management of acute refractory cardiogenic shock?

Daniel J. Goldstein, Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While great strides have been made in the management of heart failure syndromes, acute refractory cardiogenic shock carries a dismal prognosis. Initial treatment with inotropes and balloon counterpulsation can restore hemodynamics, but many patients deteriorate and succumb to multisystem organ failure if timely mechanical circulatory support is not established. Institution of support is intended as a life-saving measure where the final treatment strategy remains uncertain. This scenario is referred to as "bridge to decision." Notably, most of these patients present to community hospitals, where advanced mechanical support technologies are scarce or nonexistent. Delays in referral to a tertiary center contribute to the bleak outcomes. Herein, we review the initial management of acute heart failure and refractory cardiogenic shock, profile the typical patient, delineate current options for mechanical support in patients with acute refractory cardiogenic shock, and propose suggestions for the establishment of a seamless transfer process of these ill patients to tertiary centers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-58
Number of pages8
JournalCurrent Heart Failure Reports
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Cardiogenic Shock
Heart Failure
Counterpulsation
Community Hospital
Referral and Consultation
Hemodynamics
Technology
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Acute heart failure
  • Bridge to decision
  • Bridge to recovery
  • Bridge to transplantation
  • Mechanical support
  • Refractory cardiogenic shock
  • Ventricular assist device

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Mechanical bridge to decision : What are the options for the management of acute refractory cardiogenic shock? / Goldstein, Daniel J.; Neragi-Miandoab, Siyamek.

In: Current Heart Failure Reports, Vol. 8, No. 1, 03.2011, p. 51-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dfecaf7faf81467792e134ba6181dec8,
title = "Mechanical bridge to decision: What are the options for the management of acute refractory cardiogenic shock?",
abstract = "While great strides have been made in the management of heart failure syndromes, acute refractory cardiogenic shock carries a dismal prognosis. Initial treatment with inotropes and balloon counterpulsation can restore hemodynamics, but many patients deteriorate and succumb to multisystem organ failure if timely mechanical circulatory support is not established. Institution of support is intended as a life-saving measure where the final treatment strategy remains uncertain. This scenario is referred to as {"}bridge to decision.{"} Notably, most of these patients present to community hospitals, where advanced mechanical support technologies are scarce or nonexistent. Delays in referral to a tertiary center contribute to the bleak outcomes. Herein, we review the initial management of acute heart failure and refractory cardiogenic shock, profile the typical patient, delineate current options for mechanical support in patients with acute refractory cardiogenic shock, and propose suggestions for the establishment of a seamless transfer process of these ill patients to tertiary centers.",
keywords = "Acute heart failure, Bridge to decision, Bridge to recovery, Bridge to transplantation, Mechanical support, Refractory cardiogenic shock, Ventricular assist device",
author = "Goldstein, {Daniel J.} and Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s11897-010-0041-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "51--58",
journal = "Nature Methods",
issn = "1548-7091",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanical bridge to decision

T2 - What are the options for the management of acute refractory cardiogenic shock?

AU - Goldstein, Daniel J.

AU - Neragi-Miandoab, Siyamek

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - While great strides have been made in the management of heart failure syndromes, acute refractory cardiogenic shock carries a dismal prognosis. Initial treatment with inotropes and balloon counterpulsation can restore hemodynamics, but many patients deteriorate and succumb to multisystem organ failure if timely mechanical circulatory support is not established. Institution of support is intended as a life-saving measure where the final treatment strategy remains uncertain. This scenario is referred to as "bridge to decision." Notably, most of these patients present to community hospitals, where advanced mechanical support technologies are scarce or nonexistent. Delays in referral to a tertiary center contribute to the bleak outcomes. Herein, we review the initial management of acute heart failure and refractory cardiogenic shock, profile the typical patient, delineate current options for mechanical support in patients with acute refractory cardiogenic shock, and propose suggestions for the establishment of a seamless transfer process of these ill patients to tertiary centers.

AB - While great strides have been made in the management of heart failure syndromes, acute refractory cardiogenic shock carries a dismal prognosis. Initial treatment with inotropes and balloon counterpulsation can restore hemodynamics, but many patients deteriorate and succumb to multisystem organ failure if timely mechanical circulatory support is not established. Institution of support is intended as a life-saving measure where the final treatment strategy remains uncertain. This scenario is referred to as "bridge to decision." Notably, most of these patients present to community hospitals, where advanced mechanical support technologies are scarce or nonexistent. Delays in referral to a tertiary center contribute to the bleak outcomes. Herein, we review the initial management of acute heart failure and refractory cardiogenic shock, profile the typical patient, delineate current options for mechanical support in patients with acute refractory cardiogenic shock, and propose suggestions for the establishment of a seamless transfer process of these ill patients to tertiary centers.

KW - Acute heart failure

KW - Bridge to decision

KW - Bridge to recovery

KW - Bridge to transplantation

KW - Mechanical support

KW - Refractory cardiogenic shock

KW - Ventricular assist device

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551528024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79551528024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11897-010-0041-5

DO - 10.1007/s11897-010-0041-5

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 51

EP - 58

JO - Nature Methods

JF - Nature Methods

SN - 1548-7091

IS - 1

ER -