Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations

Marlene R. Cohen, Adam Kohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

421 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that understanding how the brain encodes information and performs computations will require studying the correlations between neurons. The recent advent of recording techniques such as multielectrode arrays and two-photon imaging has made it easier to measure correlations, opening the door for detailed exploration of their properties and contributions to cortical processing. However, studies have reported discrepant findings, providing a confusing picture. Here we briefly review these studies and conduct simulations to explore the influence of several experimental and physiological factors on correlation measurements. Differences in response strength, the time window over which spikes are counted, spike sorting conventions and internal states can all markedly affect measured correlations and systematically bias estimates. Given these complicating factors, we offer guidelines for interpreting correlation data and a discussion of how best to evaluate the effect of correlations on cortical processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)811-819
Number of pages9
JournalNature Neuroscience
Volume14
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Photons
Guidelines
Neurons
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations. / Cohen, Marlene R.; Kohn, Adam.

In: Nature Neuroscience, Vol. 14, No. 7, 07.2011, p. 811-819.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cohen, Marlene R. ; Kohn, Adam. / Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations. In: Nature Neuroscience. 2011 ; Vol. 14, No. 7. pp. 811-819.
@article{f58e049e2d764942b49b109444028d9e,
title = "Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations",
abstract = "Mounting evidence suggests that understanding how the brain encodes information and performs computations will require studying the correlations between neurons. The recent advent of recording techniques such as multielectrode arrays and two-photon imaging has made it easier to measure correlations, opening the door for detailed exploration of their properties and contributions to cortical processing. However, studies have reported discrepant findings, providing a confusing picture. Here we briefly review these studies and conduct simulations to explore the influence of several experimental and physiological factors on correlation measurements. Differences in response strength, the time window over which spikes are counted, spike sorting conventions and internal states can all markedly affect measured correlations and systematically bias estimates. Given these complicating factors, we offer guidelines for interpreting correlation data and a discussion of how best to evaluate the effect of correlations on cortical processing.",
author = "Cohen, {Marlene R.} and Adam Kohn",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1038/nn.2842",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "811--819",
journal = "Nature Neuroscience",
issn = "1097-6256",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations

AU - Cohen, Marlene R.

AU - Kohn, Adam

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Mounting evidence suggests that understanding how the brain encodes information and performs computations will require studying the correlations between neurons. The recent advent of recording techniques such as multielectrode arrays and two-photon imaging has made it easier to measure correlations, opening the door for detailed exploration of their properties and contributions to cortical processing. However, studies have reported discrepant findings, providing a confusing picture. Here we briefly review these studies and conduct simulations to explore the influence of several experimental and physiological factors on correlation measurements. Differences in response strength, the time window over which spikes are counted, spike sorting conventions and internal states can all markedly affect measured correlations and systematically bias estimates. Given these complicating factors, we offer guidelines for interpreting correlation data and a discussion of how best to evaluate the effect of correlations on cortical processing.

AB - Mounting evidence suggests that understanding how the brain encodes information and performs computations will require studying the correlations between neurons. The recent advent of recording techniques such as multielectrode arrays and two-photon imaging has made it easier to measure correlations, opening the door for detailed exploration of their properties and contributions to cortical processing. However, studies have reported discrepant findings, providing a confusing picture. Here we briefly review these studies and conduct simulations to explore the influence of several experimental and physiological factors on correlation measurements. Differences in response strength, the time window over which spikes are counted, spike sorting conventions and internal states can all markedly affect measured correlations and systematically bias estimates. Given these complicating factors, we offer guidelines for interpreting correlation data and a discussion of how best to evaluate the effect of correlations on cortical processing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959663278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959663278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/nn.2842

DO - 10.1038/nn.2842

M3 - Article

C2 - 21709677

AN - SCOPUS:79959663278

VL - 14

SP - 811

EP - 819

JO - Nature Neuroscience

JF - Nature Neuroscience

SN - 1097-6256

IS - 7

ER -