Measurement of thinking dysfunction an empirical study

Toksoz B. Karasu, Robert Plutchik, Paul Nemetz, Hope R. Conte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This investigation is concerned with the development of a practical method for assessment of thought disorders. A review of eight major textbooks and four review articles revealed 37 different terms used to describe the components of thought disorders. Because of overlap of meanings or ambiguous usage, these terms were reduced to 17 discrete terms that could be operationally defined. Twenty-five psychiatrists were surveyed on the appropriateness of the definitions and their relevance to the concept of thought disorder. An average of 83 per cent agreement was obtained, and some of the definitions were modified as a result of the survey. Eight psychiatrists then applied this scale, titled the Thinking Dysfunction Rating Scale, to the evaluation of five videotaped patient interviews. Based on observation of all five patients, interjudge agreement was over 90 per cent for all items of the scale. Analysis of variance showed that the scale significantly discriminated among schizophrenics, patients with organic brain syndromes, psychotic depressives, geriatric depressives, and outpatients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)696-703
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Volume167
Issue number11
StatePublished - 1979

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Textbooks
Depressive Disorder
Geriatrics
Analysis of Variance
Outpatients
Observation
Interviews
Brain
Thinking
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Karasu, T. B., Plutchik, R., Nemetz, P., & Conte, H. R. (1979). Measurement of thinking dysfunction an empirical study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 167(11), 696-703.

Measurement of thinking dysfunction an empirical study. / Karasu, Toksoz B.; Plutchik, Robert; Nemetz, Paul; Conte, Hope R.

In: Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 167, No. 11, 1979, p. 696-703.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Karasu, TB, Plutchik, R, Nemetz, P & Conte, HR 1979, 'Measurement of thinking dysfunction an empirical study', Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 167, no. 11, pp. 696-703.
Karasu TB, Plutchik R, Nemetz P, Conte HR. Measurement of thinking dysfunction an empirical study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1979;167(11):696-703.
Karasu, Toksoz B. ; Plutchik, Robert ; Nemetz, Paul ; Conte, Hope R. / Measurement of thinking dysfunction an empirical study. In: Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1979 ; Vol. 167, No. 11. pp. 696-703.
@article{18ee21ed8b5145a595c3dd16c07ccf1d,
title = "Measurement of thinking dysfunction an empirical study",
abstract = "This investigation is concerned with the development of a practical method for assessment of thought disorders. A review of eight major textbooks and four review articles revealed 37 different terms used to describe the components of thought disorders. Because of overlap of meanings or ambiguous usage, these terms were reduced to 17 discrete terms that could be operationally defined. Twenty-five psychiatrists were surveyed on the appropriateness of the definitions and their relevance to the concept of thought disorder. An average of 83 per cent agreement was obtained, and some of the definitions were modified as a result of the survey. Eight psychiatrists then applied this scale, titled the Thinking Dysfunction Rating Scale, to the evaluation of five videotaped patient interviews. Based on observation of all five patients, interjudge agreement was over 90 per cent for all items of the scale. Analysis of variance showed that the scale significantly discriminated among schizophrenics, patients with organic brain syndromes, psychotic depressives, geriatric depressives, and outpatients.",
author = "Karasu, {Toksoz B.} and Robert Plutchik and Paul Nemetz and Conte, {Hope R.}",
year = "1979",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "167",
pages = "696--703",
journal = "Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease",
issn = "0022-3018",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement of thinking dysfunction an empirical study

AU - Karasu, Toksoz B.

AU - Plutchik, Robert

AU - Nemetz, Paul

AU - Conte, Hope R.

PY - 1979

Y1 - 1979

N2 - This investigation is concerned with the development of a practical method for assessment of thought disorders. A review of eight major textbooks and four review articles revealed 37 different terms used to describe the components of thought disorders. Because of overlap of meanings or ambiguous usage, these terms were reduced to 17 discrete terms that could be operationally defined. Twenty-five psychiatrists were surveyed on the appropriateness of the definitions and their relevance to the concept of thought disorder. An average of 83 per cent agreement was obtained, and some of the definitions were modified as a result of the survey. Eight psychiatrists then applied this scale, titled the Thinking Dysfunction Rating Scale, to the evaluation of five videotaped patient interviews. Based on observation of all five patients, interjudge agreement was over 90 per cent for all items of the scale. Analysis of variance showed that the scale significantly discriminated among schizophrenics, patients with organic brain syndromes, psychotic depressives, geriatric depressives, and outpatients.

AB - This investigation is concerned with the development of a practical method for assessment of thought disorders. A review of eight major textbooks and four review articles revealed 37 different terms used to describe the components of thought disorders. Because of overlap of meanings or ambiguous usage, these terms were reduced to 17 discrete terms that could be operationally defined. Twenty-five psychiatrists were surveyed on the appropriateness of the definitions and their relevance to the concept of thought disorder. An average of 83 per cent agreement was obtained, and some of the definitions were modified as a result of the survey. Eight psychiatrists then applied this scale, titled the Thinking Dysfunction Rating Scale, to the evaluation of five videotaped patient interviews. Based on observation of all five patients, interjudge agreement was over 90 per cent for all items of the scale. Analysis of variance showed that the scale significantly discriminated among schizophrenics, patients with organic brain syndromes, psychotic depressives, geriatric depressives, and outpatients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018640302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018640302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 167

SP - 696

EP - 703

JO - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

JF - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

SN - 0022-3018

IS - 11

ER -