Meaningful change in measures of gait variability in older adults

Jennifer S. Brach, Subashan Perera, Stephanie Studenski, Mindy Joy Katz, Charles B. Hall, Joe Verghese

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Gait variability is an important indicator of impaired mobility in older adults; however, little is known about the meaning of change in gait variability over time. This study estimated clinically meaningful change in measures of gait variability using both distribution- and anchor-based approaches. Design: Community-based observational cohort study. Setting: Bronx County and the research center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Participants: Of 1148 participants in the Einstein Aging Study, 241 had quantitative gait assessments in two consecutive years between 2001 and 2005. Measurements: Gait variables were collected using a 12-foot instrumented walkway as participants walked at their normal walking speed. Gait variability was defined as the within-person standard deviation (SD) across steps in two 12-foot walks. Distribution-based meaningful change estimates used Cohen's effect size (0.2 for small and 0.5 for moderate effects). Anchor-based estimates were obtained using dichotomous and ordinal self-reported walking ability ratings as anchors. Results: Distribution-based estimates for small and substantial changes of variability measures were: stance time 0.005 and 0.014 s; swing time 0.003 and 0.009 s; step length 0.24 and 0.61 cm; and step width 0.03 and 0.08 cm. Among those reporting no change in walking ability, measures of gait variability were stable over 1 year. Among those reporting a decline in walking, stance time and swing time variability increased. Among those reporting an improvement in walking, only step length variability improved. Conclusion: Preliminary criteria for meaningful change are 0.01 s for stance time and swing time variability and 0.25 cm for step length variability. These estimates may identify important changes over time in both clinical settings and research studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-179
Number of pages5
JournalGait and Posture
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Gait
Walking
Research
Observational Studies
Cohort Studies
Medicine

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Gait speed
  • Gait variability
  • Meaningful change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Biophysics

Cite this

Meaningful change in measures of gait variability in older adults. / Brach, Jennifer S.; Perera, Subashan; Studenski, Stephanie; Katz, Mindy Joy; Hall, Charles B.; Verghese, Joe.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 31, No. 2, 02.2010, p. 175-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brach, Jennifer S. ; Perera, Subashan ; Studenski, Stephanie ; Katz, Mindy Joy ; Hall, Charles B. ; Verghese, Joe. / Meaningful change in measures of gait variability in older adults. In: Gait and Posture. 2010 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 175-179.
@article{41ad9a10058f44dc99f27bd9a721ab40,
title = "Meaningful change in measures of gait variability in older adults",
abstract = "Objectives: Gait variability is an important indicator of impaired mobility in older adults; however, little is known about the meaning of change in gait variability over time. This study estimated clinically meaningful change in measures of gait variability using both distribution- and anchor-based approaches. Design: Community-based observational cohort study. Setting: Bronx County and the research center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Participants: Of 1148 participants in the Einstein Aging Study, 241 had quantitative gait assessments in two consecutive years between 2001 and 2005. Measurements: Gait variables were collected using a 12-foot instrumented walkway as participants walked at their normal walking speed. Gait variability was defined as the within-person standard deviation (SD) across steps in two 12-foot walks. Distribution-based meaningful change estimates used Cohen's effect size (0.2 for small and 0.5 for moderate effects). Anchor-based estimates were obtained using dichotomous and ordinal self-reported walking ability ratings as anchors. Results: Distribution-based estimates for small and substantial changes of variability measures were: stance time 0.005 and 0.014 s; swing time 0.003 and 0.009 s; step length 0.24 and 0.61 cm; and step width 0.03 and 0.08 cm. Among those reporting no change in walking ability, measures of gait variability were stable over 1 year. Among those reporting a decline in walking, stance time and swing time variability increased. Among those reporting an improvement in walking, only step length variability improved. Conclusion: Preliminary criteria for meaningful change are 0.01 s for stance time and swing time variability and 0.25 cm for step length variability. These estimates may identify important changes over time in both clinical settings and research studies.",
keywords = "Aging, Gait speed, Gait variability, Meaningful change",
author = "Brach, {Jennifer S.} and Subashan Perera and Stephanie Studenski and Katz, {Mindy Joy} and Hall, {Charles B.} and Joe Verghese",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "175--179",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meaningful change in measures of gait variability in older adults

AU - Brach, Jennifer S.

AU - Perera, Subashan

AU - Studenski, Stephanie

AU - Katz, Mindy Joy

AU - Hall, Charles B.

AU - Verghese, Joe

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - Objectives: Gait variability is an important indicator of impaired mobility in older adults; however, little is known about the meaning of change in gait variability over time. This study estimated clinically meaningful change in measures of gait variability using both distribution- and anchor-based approaches. Design: Community-based observational cohort study. Setting: Bronx County and the research center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Participants: Of 1148 participants in the Einstein Aging Study, 241 had quantitative gait assessments in two consecutive years between 2001 and 2005. Measurements: Gait variables were collected using a 12-foot instrumented walkway as participants walked at their normal walking speed. Gait variability was defined as the within-person standard deviation (SD) across steps in two 12-foot walks. Distribution-based meaningful change estimates used Cohen's effect size (0.2 for small and 0.5 for moderate effects). Anchor-based estimates were obtained using dichotomous and ordinal self-reported walking ability ratings as anchors. Results: Distribution-based estimates for small and substantial changes of variability measures were: stance time 0.005 and 0.014 s; swing time 0.003 and 0.009 s; step length 0.24 and 0.61 cm; and step width 0.03 and 0.08 cm. Among those reporting no change in walking ability, measures of gait variability were stable over 1 year. Among those reporting a decline in walking, stance time and swing time variability increased. Among those reporting an improvement in walking, only step length variability improved. Conclusion: Preliminary criteria for meaningful change are 0.01 s for stance time and swing time variability and 0.25 cm for step length variability. These estimates may identify important changes over time in both clinical settings and research studies.

AB - Objectives: Gait variability is an important indicator of impaired mobility in older adults; however, little is known about the meaning of change in gait variability over time. This study estimated clinically meaningful change in measures of gait variability using both distribution- and anchor-based approaches. Design: Community-based observational cohort study. Setting: Bronx County and the research center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Participants: Of 1148 participants in the Einstein Aging Study, 241 had quantitative gait assessments in two consecutive years between 2001 and 2005. Measurements: Gait variables were collected using a 12-foot instrumented walkway as participants walked at their normal walking speed. Gait variability was defined as the within-person standard deviation (SD) across steps in two 12-foot walks. Distribution-based meaningful change estimates used Cohen's effect size (0.2 for small and 0.5 for moderate effects). Anchor-based estimates were obtained using dichotomous and ordinal self-reported walking ability ratings as anchors. Results: Distribution-based estimates for small and substantial changes of variability measures were: stance time 0.005 and 0.014 s; swing time 0.003 and 0.009 s; step length 0.24 and 0.61 cm; and step width 0.03 and 0.08 cm. Among those reporting no change in walking ability, measures of gait variability were stable over 1 year. Among those reporting a decline in walking, stance time and swing time variability increased. Among those reporting an improvement in walking, only step length variability improved. Conclusion: Preliminary criteria for meaningful change are 0.01 s for stance time and swing time variability and 0.25 cm for step length variability. These estimates may identify important changes over time in both clinical settings and research studies.

KW - Aging

KW - Gait speed

KW - Gait variability

KW - Meaningful change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74449086855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74449086855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.002

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 175

EP - 179

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

IS - 2

ER -