Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication

Sascha Dublin, Mona Lydon-Rochelle, Robert C. Kaplan, D. Heather Watts, Cathy W. Critchlow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

93 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine associations between induction of labor and maternal and neonatal outcomes among women without an identified indication for induction. STUDY DESIGN: This was a population-based cohort study of 2886 women with induced labor and 9648 women with spontaneous labor who were delivered at 37 to 41 weeks' gestation, all without identified medical and obstetric indications for induction. RESULTS: Among nulliparous women 19% of women with induced labor versus 10% of those with spontaneous labor underwent cesarean delivery (adjusted relative risk, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-2.08). No association was seen in multiparous women (relative risk, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.39). Among all women induction was associated with modest increases in instrumental delivery (19% vs 15%; relative risk, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.32) and shoulder dystocia (3.0% vs 1.7%; relative risk, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.69). CONCLUSION: Among women who lacked an identified indication for induction of labor, induction was associated with increased likelihood of cesarean delivery for nulliparous but not multiparous women and with modest increases in the risk of instrumental delivery and shoulder dystocia for all women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)986-994
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Volume183
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cesarean delivery
  • Induction of labor
  • Instrumental delivery
  • Shoulder dystocia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this