Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: White paper of the ACR incidental findings committee

Lincoln L. Berland, Stuart G. Silverman, Richard M. Gore, William W. Mayo-Smith, Alec J. Megibow, Judy Yee, James A. Brink, Mark E. Baker, Michael P. Federle, W. Dennis Foley, Isaac R. Francis, Brian R. Herts, Gary M. Israel, Glenn Krinsky, Joel F. Platt, William P. Shuman, Andrew J. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

484 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As multidetector CT has come to play a more central role in medical care and as CT image quality has improved, there has been an increase in the frequency of detecting "incidental findings," defined as findings that are unrelated to the clinical indication for the imaging examination performed. These "incidentalomas," as they are also called, often confound physicians and patients with how to manage them. Although it is known that most incidental findings are likely benign and often have little or no clinical significance, the inclination to evaluate them is often driven by physician and patient unwillingness to accept uncertainty, even given the rare possibility of an important diagnosis. The evaluation and surveillance of incidental findings have also been cited as among the causes for the increased utilization of cross-sectional imaging. Indeed, incidental findings may be serious, and hence, when and how to evaluate them are unclear. The workup of incidentalomas has varied widely by physician and region, and some standardization is desirable in light of the current need to limit costs and reduce risk to patients. Subjecting a patient with an incidentaloma to unnecessary testing and treatment can result in a potentially injurious and expensive cascade of tests and procedures. With the participation of other radiologic organizations listed herein, the ACR formed the Incidental Findings Committee to derive a practical and medically appropriate approach to managing incidental findings on CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis. The committee has used a consensus method based on repeated reviews and revisions of this document and a collective review and interpretation of relevant literature. This white paper provides guidance developed by this committee for addressing incidental findings in the kidneys, liver, adrenal glands, and pancreas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)754-773
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume7
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Incidental Findings
Physicians
Adrenal Glands
Pelvis
Abdomen
Uncertainty
Pancreas
Organizations
Kidney
Costs and Cost Analysis
Liver

Keywords

  • adrenal nodule
  • Incidental findings
  • incidentaloma
  • liver lesion
  • pancreatic cyst
  • renal cyst

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT : White paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. / Berland, Lincoln L.; Silverman, Stuart G.; Gore, Richard M.; Mayo-Smith, William W.; Megibow, Alec J.; Yee, Judy; Brink, James A.; Baker, Mark E.; Federle, Michael P.; Foley, W. Dennis; Francis, Isaac R.; Herts, Brian R.; Israel, Gary M.; Krinsky, Glenn; Platt, Joel F.; Shuman, William P.; Taylor, Andrew J.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 7, No. 10, 01.01.2010, p. 754-773.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Berland, LL, Silverman, SG, Gore, RM, Mayo-Smith, WW, Megibow, AJ, Yee, J, Brink, JA, Baker, ME, Federle, MP, Foley, WD, Francis, IR, Herts, BR, Israel, GM, Krinsky, G, Platt, JF, Shuman, WP & Taylor, AJ 2010, 'Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: White paper of the ACR incidental findings committee', Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 754-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.013
Berland, Lincoln L. ; Silverman, Stuart G. ; Gore, Richard M. ; Mayo-Smith, William W. ; Megibow, Alec J. ; Yee, Judy ; Brink, James A. ; Baker, Mark E. ; Federle, Michael P. ; Foley, W. Dennis ; Francis, Isaac R. ; Herts, Brian R. ; Israel, Gary M. ; Krinsky, Glenn ; Platt, Joel F. ; Shuman, William P. ; Taylor, Andrew J. / Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT : White paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2010 ; Vol. 7, No. 10. pp. 754-773.
@article{9f4b91d416634513a4fdfb61ba9f6de2,
title = "Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: White paper of the ACR incidental findings committee",
abstract = "As multidetector CT has come to play a more central role in medical care and as CT image quality has improved, there has been an increase in the frequency of detecting {"}incidental findings,{"} defined as findings that are unrelated to the clinical indication for the imaging examination performed. These {"}incidentalomas,{"} as they are also called, often confound physicians and patients with how to manage them. Although it is known that most incidental findings are likely benign and often have little or no clinical significance, the inclination to evaluate them is often driven by physician and patient unwillingness to accept uncertainty, even given the rare possibility of an important diagnosis. The evaluation and surveillance of incidental findings have also been cited as among the causes for the increased utilization of cross-sectional imaging. Indeed, incidental findings may be serious, and hence, when and how to evaluate them are unclear. The workup of incidentalomas has varied widely by physician and region, and some standardization is desirable in light of the current need to limit costs and reduce risk to patients. Subjecting a patient with an incidentaloma to unnecessary testing and treatment can result in a potentially injurious and expensive cascade of tests and procedures. With the participation of other radiologic organizations listed herein, the ACR formed the Incidental Findings Committee to derive a practical and medically appropriate approach to managing incidental findings on CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis. The committee has used a consensus method based on repeated reviews and revisions of this document and a collective review and interpretation of relevant literature. This white paper provides guidance developed by this committee for addressing incidental findings in the kidneys, liver, adrenal glands, and pancreas.",
keywords = "adrenal nodule, Incidental findings, incidentaloma, liver lesion, pancreatic cyst, renal cyst",
author = "Berland, {Lincoln L.} and Silverman, {Stuart G.} and Gore, {Richard M.} and Mayo-Smith, {William W.} and Megibow, {Alec J.} and Judy Yee and Brink, {James A.} and Baker, {Mark E.} and Federle, {Michael P.} and Foley, {W. Dennis} and Francis, {Isaac R.} and Herts, {Brian R.} and Israel, {Gary M.} and Glenn Krinsky and Platt, {Joel F.} and Shuman, {William P.} and Taylor, {Andrew J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "754--773",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT

T2 - White paper of the ACR incidental findings committee

AU - Berland, Lincoln L.

AU - Silverman, Stuart G.

AU - Gore, Richard M.

AU - Mayo-Smith, William W.

AU - Megibow, Alec J.

AU - Yee, Judy

AU - Brink, James A.

AU - Baker, Mark E.

AU - Federle, Michael P.

AU - Foley, W. Dennis

AU - Francis, Isaac R.

AU - Herts, Brian R.

AU - Israel, Gary M.

AU - Krinsky, Glenn

AU - Platt, Joel F.

AU - Shuman, William P.

AU - Taylor, Andrew J.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - As multidetector CT has come to play a more central role in medical care and as CT image quality has improved, there has been an increase in the frequency of detecting "incidental findings," defined as findings that are unrelated to the clinical indication for the imaging examination performed. These "incidentalomas," as they are also called, often confound physicians and patients with how to manage them. Although it is known that most incidental findings are likely benign and often have little or no clinical significance, the inclination to evaluate them is often driven by physician and patient unwillingness to accept uncertainty, even given the rare possibility of an important diagnosis. The evaluation and surveillance of incidental findings have also been cited as among the causes for the increased utilization of cross-sectional imaging. Indeed, incidental findings may be serious, and hence, when and how to evaluate them are unclear. The workup of incidentalomas has varied widely by physician and region, and some standardization is desirable in light of the current need to limit costs and reduce risk to patients. Subjecting a patient with an incidentaloma to unnecessary testing and treatment can result in a potentially injurious and expensive cascade of tests and procedures. With the participation of other radiologic organizations listed herein, the ACR formed the Incidental Findings Committee to derive a practical and medically appropriate approach to managing incidental findings on CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis. The committee has used a consensus method based on repeated reviews and revisions of this document and a collective review and interpretation of relevant literature. This white paper provides guidance developed by this committee for addressing incidental findings in the kidneys, liver, adrenal glands, and pancreas.

AB - As multidetector CT has come to play a more central role in medical care and as CT image quality has improved, there has been an increase in the frequency of detecting "incidental findings," defined as findings that are unrelated to the clinical indication for the imaging examination performed. These "incidentalomas," as they are also called, often confound physicians and patients with how to manage them. Although it is known that most incidental findings are likely benign and often have little or no clinical significance, the inclination to evaluate them is often driven by physician and patient unwillingness to accept uncertainty, even given the rare possibility of an important diagnosis. The evaluation and surveillance of incidental findings have also been cited as among the causes for the increased utilization of cross-sectional imaging. Indeed, incidental findings may be serious, and hence, when and how to evaluate them are unclear. The workup of incidentalomas has varied widely by physician and region, and some standardization is desirable in light of the current need to limit costs and reduce risk to patients. Subjecting a patient with an incidentaloma to unnecessary testing and treatment can result in a potentially injurious and expensive cascade of tests and procedures. With the participation of other radiologic organizations listed herein, the ACR formed the Incidental Findings Committee to derive a practical and medically appropriate approach to managing incidental findings on CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis. The committee has used a consensus method based on repeated reviews and revisions of this document and a collective review and interpretation of relevant literature. This white paper provides guidance developed by this committee for addressing incidental findings in the kidneys, liver, adrenal glands, and pancreas.

KW - adrenal nodule

KW - Incidental findings

KW - incidentaloma

KW - liver lesion

KW - pancreatic cyst

KW - renal cyst

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928096355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928096355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.013

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84928096355

VL - 7

SP - 754

EP - 773

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 10

ER -