Management of postintubation tracheal stenosis: Appropriate indications make outcome differences

Antoine E. Melkane, Nayla E. Matar, Amine C. Haddad, Michel Nassar, Homère G. Almoutran, Ziad Rohayem, Mohammad Daher, Georges Chalouhy, George Dabar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Laryngotracheal stenosis is difficult to treat and its etiologies are multiple; nowadays, the most common ones are postintubation or posttracheostomy stenoses. Objective: To provide an algorithm for the management of postintubation laryngotracheal stenoses (PILTS) based on the experience of a tertiary care referral center. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients treated for PILTS over a 10-year period. Patients were divided into a surgically and an endoscopically treated group according to predefined criteria. The characteristics of the two groups were analyzed and the outcomes compared. Results: Thirty-three consecutive patients were included in the study: 14 in the surgically treated group and 19 in the endoscopically treated group. Our candidates for airway surgery were healthy patients presenting with complex tracheal stenoses, subglottic involvement or associated tracheomalacia. The endoscopic candidates were chronically ill patients presenting with simple, strictly tracheal stenoses not exceeding 4 cm in length. Stents were placed if the stenosis was associated with tracheomalacia or exceeded 2 cm in total length. In the surgically treated group, 2/14 patients needed more than one procedure versus 8/19 patients in the endoscopically treated group. At the end of the intervention, 50% of the patients were decannulated in the surgically treated group versus 84.2% in the endoscopically treated group (p = 0.03). However, the decannulation rates at 6 months and the symptomatology at rest and on exertion on the last follow-up visit were comparable in the two groups. Conclusion: Our experience in the management of PILTS demonstrates that both surgery and endoscopy yield excellent functional outcomes if the treatment strategy is based on clear, predefined objective criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)395-401
Number of pages7
JournalRespiration
Volume79
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tracheal Stenosis
Pathologic Constriction
Tracheomalacia
Tertiary Care Centers
Endoscopy
Stents
Chronic Disease
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Airway surgery
  • Argon plasma coagulation
  • Intubation complications
  • Laryngotracheal stenosis
  • Tracheal dilation
  • Tracheal resection
  • Tracheal stenosis
  • Tracheal stent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Melkane, A. E., Matar, N. E., Haddad, A. C., Nassar, M., Almoutran, H. G., Rohayem, Z., ... Dabar, G. (2010). Management of postintubation tracheal stenosis: Appropriate indications make outcome differences. Respiration, 79(5), 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1159/000279225

Management of postintubation tracheal stenosis : Appropriate indications make outcome differences. / Melkane, Antoine E.; Matar, Nayla E.; Haddad, Amine C.; Nassar, Michel; Almoutran, Homère G.; Rohayem, Ziad; Daher, Mohammad; Chalouhy, Georges; Dabar, George.

In: Respiration, Vol. 79, No. 5, 04.2010, p. 395-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Melkane, AE, Matar, NE, Haddad, AC, Nassar, M, Almoutran, HG, Rohayem, Z, Daher, M, Chalouhy, G & Dabar, G 2010, 'Management of postintubation tracheal stenosis: Appropriate indications make outcome differences', Respiration, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 395-401. https://doi.org/10.1159/000279225
Melkane, Antoine E. ; Matar, Nayla E. ; Haddad, Amine C. ; Nassar, Michel ; Almoutran, Homère G. ; Rohayem, Ziad ; Daher, Mohammad ; Chalouhy, Georges ; Dabar, George. / Management of postintubation tracheal stenosis : Appropriate indications make outcome differences. In: Respiration. 2010 ; Vol. 79, No. 5. pp. 395-401.
@article{33b3e8cc2bc24cde87b31eb0d08adb2e,
title = "Management of postintubation tracheal stenosis: Appropriate indications make outcome differences",
abstract = "Background: Laryngotracheal stenosis is difficult to treat and its etiologies are multiple; nowadays, the most common ones are postintubation or posttracheostomy stenoses. Objective: To provide an algorithm for the management of postintubation laryngotracheal stenoses (PILTS) based on the experience of a tertiary care referral center. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients treated for PILTS over a 10-year period. Patients were divided into a surgically and an endoscopically treated group according to predefined criteria. The characteristics of the two groups were analyzed and the outcomes compared. Results: Thirty-three consecutive patients were included in the study: 14 in the surgically treated group and 19 in the endoscopically treated group. Our candidates for airway surgery were healthy patients presenting with complex tracheal stenoses, subglottic involvement or associated tracheomalacia. The endoscopic candidates were chronically ill patients presenting with simple, strictly tracheal stenoses not exceeding 4 cm in length. Stents were placed if the stenosis was associated with tracheomalacia or exceeded 2 cm in total length. In the surgically treated group, 2/14 patients needed more than one procedure versus 8/19 patients in the endoscopically treated group. At the end of the intervention, 50{\%} of the patients were decannulated in the surgically treated group versus 84.2{\%} in the endoscopically treated group (p = 0.03). However, the decannulation rates at 6 months and the symptomatology at rest and on exertion on the last follow-up visit were comparable in the two groups. Conclusion: Our experience in the management of PILTS demonstrates that both surgery and endoscopy yield excellent functional outcomes if the treatment strategy is based on clear, predefined objective criteria.",
keywords = "Airway surgery, Argon plasma coagulation, Intubation complications, Laryngotracheal stenosis, Tracheal dilation, Tracheal resection, Tracheal stenosis, Tracheal stent",
author = "Melkane, {Antoine E.} and Matar, {Nayla E.} and Haddad, {Amine C.} and Michel Nassar and Almoutran, {Hom{\`e}re G.} and Ziad Rohayem and Mohammad Daher and Georges Chalouhy and George Dabar",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1159/000279225",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "395--401",
journal = "Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases",
issn = "0025-7931",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of postintubation tracheal stenosis

T2 - Appropriate indications make outcome differences

AU - Melkane, Antoine E.

AU - Matar, Nayla E.

AU - Haddad, Amine C.

AU - Nassar, Michel

AU - Almoutran, Homère G.

AU - Rohayem, Ziad

AU - Daher, Mohammad

AU - Chalouhy, Georges

AU - Dabar, George

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - Background: Laryngotracheal stenosis is difficult to treat and its etiologies are multiple; nowadays, the most common ones are postintubation or posttracheostomy stenoses. Objective: To provide an algorithm for the management of postintubation laryngotracheal stenoses (PILTS) based on the experience of a tertiary care referral center. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients treated for PILTS over a 10-year period. Patients were divided into a surgically and an endoscopically treated group according to predefined criteria. The characteristics of the two groups were analyzed and the outcomes compared. Results: Thirty-three consecutive patients were included in the study: 14 in the surgically treated group and 19 in the endoscopically treated group. Our candidates for airway surgery were healthy patients presenting with complex tracheal stenoses, subglottic involvement or associated tracheomalacia. The endoscopic candidates were chronically ill patients presenting with simple, strictly tracheal stenoses not exceeding 4 cm in length. Stents were placed if the stenosis was associated with tracheomalacia or exceeded 2 cm in total length. In the surgically treated group, 2/14 patients needed more than one procedure versus 8/19 patients in the endoscopically treated group. At the end of the intervention, 50% of the patients were decannulated in the surgically treated group versus 84.2% in the endoscopically treated group (p = 0.03). However, the decannulation rates at 6 months and the symptomatology at rest and on exertion on the last follow-up visit were comparable in the two groups. Conclusion: Our experience in the management of PILTS demonstrates that both surgery and endoscopy yield excellent functional outcomes if the treatment strategy is based on clear, predefined objective criteria.

AB - Background: Laryngotracheal stenosis is difficult to treat and its etiologies are multiple; nowadays, the most common ones are postintubation or posttracheostomy stenoses. Objective: To provide an algorithm for the management of postintubation laryngotracheal stenoses (PILTS) based on the experience of a tertiary care referral center. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients treated for PILTS over a 10-year period. Patients were divided into a surgically and an endoscopically treated group according to predefined criteria. The characteristics of the two groups were analyzed and the outcomes compared. Results: Thirty-three consecutive patients were included in the study: 14 in the surgically treated group and 19 in the endoscopically treated group. Our candidates for airway surgery were healthy patients presenting with complex tracheal stenoses, subglottic involvement or associated tracheomalacia. The endoscopic candidates were chronically ill patients presenting with simple, strictly tracheal stenoses not exceeding 4 cm in length. Stents were placed if the stenosis was associated with tracheomalacia or exceeded 2 cm in total length. In the surgically treated group, 2/14 patients needed more than one procedure versus 8/19 patients in the endoscopically treated group. At the end of the intervention, 50% of the patients were decannulated in the surgically treated group versus 84.2% in the endoscopically treated group (p = 0.03). However, the decannulation rates at 6 months and the symptomatology at rest and on exertion on the last follow-up visit were comparable in the two groups. Conclusion: Our experience in the management of PILTS demonstrates that both surgery and endoscopy yield excellent functional outcomes if the treatment strategy is based on clear, predefined objective criteria.

KW - Airway surgery

KW - Argon plasma coagulation

KW - Intubation complications

KW - Laryngotracheal stenosis

KW - Tracheal dilation

KW - Tracheal resection

KW - Tracheal stenosis

KW - Tracheal stent

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951296063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951296063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000279225

DO - 10.1159/000279225

M3 - Article

C2 - 20110646

AN - SCOPUS:77951296063

VL - 79

SP - 395

EP - 401

JO - Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases

JF - Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases

SN - 0025-7931

IS - 5

ER -