Mammary ductoscopy for evaluation of nipple discharge

Edna Kapenhas-Valdes, Sheldon M. Feldman, Jean Marc Cohen, Susan K. Boolbol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Most breast cancers originate in the ductal epithelium with normal cells progressing to atypia and finally to carcinoma. Ductoscopy enables one to visualize and sample the ductal epithelium and therefore identify early changes cytologically. This report describes our experience with mammary ductoscopy as a tool for evaluation of nipple discharge at Beth Israel Medical Center. Methods: A prospective review of all patients who have undergone ductoscopy for evaluation of persistent nipple discharge was performed. The Acueity ductoscopy system with .9-mm scope and a video monitor with x60 magnification were used. Brush biopsy samples and lavage fluid were obtained from some patients and were sent for cytologic analysis. A subset of patients underwent ductoscopically guided duct excision. Results: Ninety-three patients underwent ductoscopic evaluation of 110 ducts. Of these, 67 patients had abnormal findings and therefore underwent ductoscopically guided duct excision. The remaining 26 patients (28%) had normal ductoscopic examinations. The depth at which intraductal abnormalities were visualized was from 3 to 8 cm with an average of 4.4 cm for cancer cases and from 1 to 10 cm with an average of 4.5 cm for papillomas. Forty-two patients were diagnosed with papilloma/ papillomatosis, six patients were diagnosed with atypical papilloma/atypical ductal hyperplasia/atypical lobular hyperplasia, and six patients were diagnosed with cancer. Of the six patients diagnosed with cancer, 67% had normal breast imaging, and other than nipple discharge, 67% had normal breast examinations. Conclusion: Mammary ductoscopy is a useful tool in the evaluation of patients with nipple discharge. Although the most common cause of nipple discharge is an intraductal papilloma, nipple discharge can be the presenting symptom for cancer. Our experience revealed a papilloma rate of 45% (42 of 93), cancer rate of 6.5% (6 of 93), and an atypia rate of 6.5% (6 of 93) among the patients with nipple discharge. Mammary ductoscopy allows for accurate visualization, analysis, and excision of intraductal abnormalities. Many deeper intraductal abnormalities could be missed by blind surgical excision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2720-2727
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume15
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Breast
Papilloma
Neoplasms
Nipple Discharge
Intraductal Papilloma
Epithelium
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Therapeutic Irrigation
Israel
Hyperplasia
Breast Neoplasms
Carcinoma
Biopsy

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Breast endoscopy
  • Intraductal approach
  • Mammary ductoscopy
  • Nipple discharge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Mammary ductoscopy for evaluation of nipple discharge. / Kapenhas-Valdes, Edna; Feldman, Sheldon M.; Cohen, Jean Marc; Boolbol, Susan K.

In: Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 15, No. 10, 01.10.2008, p. 2720-2727.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kapenhas-Valdes, Edna ; Feldman, Sheldon M. ; Cohen, Jean Marc ; Boolbol, Susan K. / Mammary ductoscopy for evaluation of nipple discharge. In: Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2008 ; Vol. 15, No. 10. pp. 2720-2727.
@article{12e6ecb5495e4c6cb867cdcede27de77,
title = "Mammary ductoscopy for evaluation of nipple discharge",
abstract = "Background: Most breast cancers originate in the ductal epithelium with normal cells progressing to atypia and finally to carcinoma. Ductoscopy enables one to visualize and sample the ductal epithelium and therefore identify early changes cytologically. This report describes our experience with mammary ductoscopy as a tool for evaluation of nipple discharge at Beth Israel Medical Center. Methods: A prospective review of all patients who have undergone ductoscopy for evaluation of persistent nipple discharge was performed. The Acueity ductoscopy system with .9-mm scope and a video monitor with x60 magnification were used. Brush biopsy samples and lavage fluid were obtained from some patients and were sent for cytologic analysis. A subset of patients underwent ductoscopically guided duct excision. Results: Ninety-three patients underwent ductoscopic evaluation of 110 ducts. Of these, 67 patients had abnormal findings and therefore underwent ductoscopically guided duct excision. The remaining 26 patients (28{\%}) had normal ductoscopic examinations. The depth at which intraductal abnormalities were visualized was from 3 to 8 cm with an average of 4.4 cm for cancer cases and from 1 to 10 cm with an average of 4.5 cm for papillomas. Forty-two patients were diagnosed with papilloma/ papillomatosis, six patients were diagnosed with atypical papilloma/atypical ductal hyperplasia/atypical lobular hyperplasia, and six patients were diagnosed with cancer. Of the six patients diagnosed with cancer, 67{\%} had normal breast imaging, and other than nipple discharge, 67{\%} had normal breast examinations. Conclusion: Mammary ductoscopy is a useful tool in the evaluation of patients with nipple discharge. Although the most common cause of nipple discharge is an intraductal papilloma, nipple discharge can be the presenting symptom for cancer. Our experience revealed a papilloma rate of 45{\%} (42 of 93), cancer rate of 6.5{\%} (6 of 93), and an atypia rate of 6.5{\%} (6 of 93) among the patients with nipple discharge. Mammary ductoscopy allows for accurate visualization, analysis, and excision of intraductal abnormalities. Many deeper intraductal abnormalities could be missed by blind surgical excision.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Breast endoscopy, Intraductal approach, Mammary ductoscopy, Nipple discharge",
author = "Edna Kapenhas-Valdes and Feldman, {Sheldon M.} and Cohen, {Jean Marc} and Boolbol, {Susan K.}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1245/s10434-008-0012-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "2720--2727",
journal = "Annals of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "1068-9265",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mammary ductoscopy for evaluation of nipple discharge

AU - Kapenhas-Valdes, Edna

AU - Feldman, Sheldon M.

AU - Cohen, Jean Marc

AU - Boolbol, Susan K.

PY - 2008/10/1

Y1 - 2008/10/1

N2 - Background: Most breast cancers originate in the ductal epithelium with normal cells progressing to atypia and finally to carcinoma. Ductoscopy enables one to visualize and sample the ductal epithelium and therefore identify early changes cytologically. This report describes our experience with mammary ductoscopy as a tool for evaluation of nipple discharge at Beth Israel Medical Center. Methods: A prospective review of all patients who have undergone ductoscopy for evaluation of persistent nipple discharge was performed. The Acueity ductoscopy system with .9-mm scope and a video monitor with x60 magnification were used. Brush biopsy samples and lavage fluid were obtained from some patients and were sent for cytologic analysis. A subset of patients underwent ductoscopically guided duct excision. Results: Ninety-three patients underwent ductoscopic evaluation of 110 ducts. Of these, 67 patients had abnormal findings and therefore underwent ductoscopically guided duct excision. The remaining 26 patients (28%) had normal ductoscopic examinations. The depth at which intraductal abnormalities were visualized was from 3 to 8 cm with an average of 4.4 cm for cancer cases and from 1 to 10 cm with an average of 4.5 cm for papillomas. Forty-two patients were diagnosed with papilloma/ papillomatosis, six patients were diagnosed with atypical papilloma/atypical ductal hyperplasia/atypical lobular hyperplasia, and six patients were diagnosed with cancer. Of the six patients diagnosed with cancer, 67% had normal breast imaging, and other than nipple discharge, 67% had normal breast examinations. Conclusion: Mammary ductoscopy is a useful tool in the evaluation of patients with nipple discharge. Although the most common cause of nipple discharge is an intraductal papilloma, nipple discharge can be the presenting symptom for cancer. Our experience revealed a papilloma rate of 45% (42 of 93), cancer rate of 6.5% (6 of 93), and an atypia rate of 6.5% (6 of 93) among the patients with nipple discharge. Mammary ductoscopy allows for accurate visualization, analysis, and excision of intraductal abnormalities. Many deeper intraductal abnormalities could be missed by blind surgical excision.

AB - Background: Most breast cancers originate in the ductal epithelium with normal cells progressing to atypia and finally to carcinoma. Ductoscopy enables one to visualize and sample the ductal epithelium and therefore identify early changes cytologically. This report describes our experience with mammary ductoscopy as a tool for evaluation of nipple discharge at Beth Israel Medical Center. Methods: A prospective review of all patients who have undergone ductoscopy for evaluation of persistent nipple discharge was performed. The Acueity ductoscopy system with .9-mm scope and a video monitor with x60 magnification were used. Brush biopsy samples and lavage fluid were obtained from some patients and were sent for cytologic analysis. A subset of patients underwent ductoscopically guided duct excision. Results: Ninety-three patients underwent ductoscopic evaluation of 110 ducts. Of these, 67 patients had abnormal findings and therefore underwent ductoscopically guided duct excision. The remaining 26 patients (28%) had normal ductoscopic examinations. The depth at which intraductal abnormalities were visualized was from 3 to 8 cm with an average of 4.4 cm for cancer cases and from 1 to 10 cm with an average of 4.5 cm for papillomas. Forty-two patients were diagnosed with papilloma/ papillomatosis, six patients were diagnosed with atypical papilloma/atypical ductal hyperplasia/atypical lobular hyperplasia, and six patients were diagnosed with cancer. Of the six patients diagnosed with cancer, 67% had normal breast imaging, and other than nipple discharge, 67% had normal breast examinations. Conclusion: Mammary ductoscopy is a useful tool in the evaluation of patients with nipple discharge. Although the most common cause of nipple discharge is an intraductal papilloma, nipple discharge can be the presenting symptom for cancer. Our experience revealed a papilloma rate of 45% (42 of 93), cancer rate of 6.5% (6 of 93), and an atypia rate of 6.5% (6 of 93) among the patients with nipple discharge. Mammary ductoscopy allows for accurate visualization, analysis, and excision of intraductal abnormalities. Many deeper intraductal abnormalities could be missed by blind surgical excision.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Breast endoscopy

KW - Intraductal approach

KW - Mammary ductoscopy

KW - Nipple discharge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51649090842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51649090842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1245/s10434-008-0012-1

DO - 10.1245/s10434-008-0012-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 18685898

AN - SCOPUS:51649090842

VL - 15

SP - 2720

EP - 2727

JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology

JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology

SN - 1068-9265

IS - 10

ER -