Long-Term Outcomes: What Should the Focus Be?

Judy L. Aschner, Michele C. Walsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The neonatal intervention trials of the 1980s and early 1990s focused primarily on short-term outcomes. Contemporary clinical trials have recognized the importance of longer-term outcomes but have rarely been powered to achieve that aim. This review discusses important and clinically relevant outcomes that future trials should be powered to address and identifies the challenges facing the neonatal clinical trials community. These challenges include consensus definitions of relevant outcomes that are objective and validated, variability among centers in populations and practices, and the need for predictive surrogate markers of long-term outcomes. Future trials must be designed and powered to address the potential for harm as well as the prospect of benefit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)205-217
Number of pages13
JournalClinics in Perinatology
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Clinical Trials
Biomarkers
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Long-Term Outcomes : What Should the Focus Be? / Aschner, Judy L.; Walsh, Michele C.

In: Clinics in Perinatology, Vol. 34, No. 1, 03.2007, p. 205-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aschner, Judy L. ; Walsh, Michele C. / Long-Term Outcomes : What Should the Focus Be?. In: Clinics in Perinatology. 2007 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 205-217.
@article{f9ebe33a44d14687ad428fc05d1cef59,
title = "Long-Term Outcomes: What Should the Focus Be?",
abstract = "The neonatal intervention trials of the 1980s and early 1990s focused primarily on short-term outcomes. Contemporary clinical trials have recognized the importance of longer-term outcomes but have rarely been powered to achieve that aim. This review discusses important and clinically relevant outcomes that future trials should be powered to address and identifies the challenges facing the neonatal clinical trials community. These challenges include consensus definitions of relevant outcomes that are objective and validated, variability among centers in populations and practices, and the need for predictive surrogate markers of long-term outcomes. Future trials must be designed and powered to address the potential for harm as well as the prospect of benefit.",
author = "Aschner, {Judy L.} and Walsh, {Michele C.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.clp.2006.12.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "205--217",
journal = "Clinics in Perinatology",
issn = "0095-5108",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-Term Outcomes

T2 - What Should the Focus Be?

AU - Aschner, Judy L.

AU - Walsh, Michele C.

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - The neonatal intervention trials of the 1980s and early 1990s focused primarily on short-term outcomes. Contemporary clinical trials have recognized the importance of longer-term outcomes but have rarely been powered to achieve that aim. This review discusses important and clinically relevant outcomes that future trials should be powered to address and identifies the challenges facing the neonatal clinical trials community. These challenges include consensus definitions of relevant outcomes that are objective and validated, variability among centers in populations and practices, and the need for predictive surrogate markers of long-term outcomes. Future trials must be designed and powered to address the potential for harm as well as the prospect of benefit.

AB - The neonatal intervention trials of the 1980s and early 1990s focused primarily on short-term outcomes. Contemporary clinical trials have recognized the importance of longer-term outcomes but have rarely been powered to achieve that aim. This review discusses important and clinically relevant outcomes that future trials should be powered to address and identifies the challenges facing the neonatal clinical trials community. These challenges include consensus definitions of relevant outcomes that are objective and validated, variability among centers in populations and practices, and the need for predictive surrogate markers of long-term outcomes. Future trials must be designed and powered to address the potential for harm as well as the prospect of benefit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947604018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947604018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clp.2006.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.clp.2006.12.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 17394939

AN - SCOPUS:33947604018

VL - 34

SP - 205

EP - 217

JO - Clinics in Perinatology

JF - Clinics in Perinatology

SN - 0095-5108

IS - 1

ER -