Long lives, short indications. The case for removable inferior cava filters

Grace H. Ku, Henny H. Billett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vena cava filters have been in use for decades to prevent pulmonary embolization from deep venous thrombosis. These filters have been shown to be effective, with fairly low rates of filter migration, fracture and thrombosis. However considering that filters remain in situ for the life of the patient and that studies do not show increased longevity in patients with filters, any complications from filters are significant concerns. In addition, often patients require filters for only temporary indications, e.g. contraindication for anticoagulation because of impending procedures, or for only a transient risk period, as in trauma or pregnant patients. In these cases, removable filters may be more appealing. This review will examine the different types of removable filters and the indications in which removable filters may have an advantage over permanent filters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-22
Number of pages6
JournalThrombosis and Haemostasis
Volume93
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005

Fingerprint

Vena Cava Filters
Venous Thrombosis
Thrombosis
Lung
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Removable
  • Retrievable
  • Temporary
  • Vena cava filter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Cite this

Long lives, short indications. The case for removable inferior cava filters. / Ku, Grace H.; Billett, Henny H.

In: Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Vol. 93, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 17-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e24d3f62321b4e92848f6fc333e88202,
title = "Long lives, short indications. The case for removable inferior cava filters",
abstract = "Vena cava filters have been in use for decades to prevent pulmonary embolization from deep venous thrombosis. These filters have been shown to be effective, with fairly low rates of filter migration, fracture and thrombosis. However considering that filters remain in situ for the life of the patient and that studies do not show increased longevity in patients with filters, any complications from filters are significant concerns. In addition, often patients require filters for only temporary indications, e.g. contraindication for anticoagulation because of impending procedures, or for only a transient risk period, as in trauma or pregnant patients. In these cases, removable filters may be more appealing. This review will examine the different types of removable filters and the indications in which removable filters may have an advantage over permanent filters.",
keywords = "Removable, Retrievable, Temporary, Vena cava filter",
author = "Ku, {Grace H.} and Billett, {Henny H.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1160/TH04-06-0399",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "17--22",
journal = "Thrombosis and Haemostasis",
issn = "0340-6245",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long lives, short indications. The case for removable inferior cava filters

AU - Ku, Grace H.

AU - Billett, Henny H.

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Vena cava filters have been in use for decades to prevent pulmonary embolization from deep venous thrombosis. These filters have been shown to be effective, with fairly low rates of filter migration, fracture and thrombosis. However considering that filters remain in situ for the life of the patient and that studies do not show increased longevity in patients with filters, any complications from filters are significant concerns. In addition, often patients require filters for only temporary indications, e.g. contraindication for anticoagulation because of impending procedures, or for only a transient risk period, as in trauma or pregnant patients. In these cases, removable filters may be more appealing. This review will examine the different types of removable filters and the indications in which removable filters may have an advantage over permanent filters.

AB - Vena cava filters have been in use for decades to prevent pulmonary embolization from deep venous thrombosis. These filters have been shown to be effective, with fairly low rates of filter migration, fracture and thrombosis. However considering that filters remain in situ for the life of the patient and that studies do not show increased longevity in patients with filters, any complications from filters are significant concerns. In addition, often patients require filters for only temporary indications, e.g. contraindication for anticoagulation because of impending procedures, or for only a transient risk period, as in trauma or pregnant patients. In these cases, removable filters may be more appealing. This review will examine the different types of removable filters and the indications in which removable filters may have an advantage over permanent filters.

KW - Removable

KW - Retrievable

KW - Temporary

KW - Vena cava filter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12344325981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12344325981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1160/TH04-06-0399

DO - 10.1160/TH04-06-0399

M3 - Article

C2 - 15630485

AN - SCOPUS:12344325981

VL - 93

SP - 17

EP - 22

JO - Thrombosis and Haemostasis

JF - Thrombosis and Haemostasis

SN - 0340-6245

IS - 1

ER -