Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults: An Official American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: Inspiratory Pressure Augmentation During Spontaneous Breathing Trials, Protocols Minimizing Sedation, and Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately After Extubation

Daniel R. Ouellette, Sheena Patel, Timothy D. Girard, Peter E. Morris, Gregory A. Schmidt, Jonathon D. Truwit, Waleed Alhazzani, Suzanne M. Burns, Scott K. Epstein, Andres Esteban, Eddy Fan, Miguel Ferrer, Gilles L. Fraser, Michelle Ng Gong, Catherine L. Hough, Sangeeta Mehta, Rahul Nanchal, Amy J. Pawlik, William D. Schweickert, Curtis N. SesslerThomas Strøm, John P. Kress

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background An update of evidence-based guidelines concerning liberation from mechanical ventilation is needed as new evidence has become available. The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) have collaborated to provide recommendations to clinicians concerning liberation from the ventilator. Methods Comprehensive evidence syntheses, including meta-analyses, were performed to summarize all available evidence relevant to the guideline panel's questions. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and the results were summarized in evidence profiles. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations developed and approved by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation. Results Recommendations for three population, intervention, comparator, outcome (PICO) questions concerning ventilator liberation are presented in this document. The guideline panel considered the balance of desirable (benefits) and undesirable (burdens, adverse effects, costs) consequences, quality of evidence, feasibility, and acceptability of various interventions with respect to the selected questions. Conditional (weak) recommendations were made to use inspiratory pressure augmentation in the initial spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and to use protocols to minimize sedation for patients ventilated for more than 24 h. A strong recommendation was made to use preventive noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for high-risk patients ventilated for more than 24 h immediately after extubation to improve selected outcomes. The recommendations were limited by the quality of the available evidence. Conclusions The guideline panel provided recommendations for inspiratory pressure augmentation during an initial SBT, protocols minimizing sedation, and preventative NIV, in relation to ventilator liberation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-180
Number of pages15
JournalChest
Volume151
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Noninvasive Ventilation
Clinical Protocols
Practice Guidelines
Artificial Respiration
Critical Illness
Respiration
Mechanical Ventilators
Guidelines
Pressure
Meta-Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Population

Keywords

  • evidence-based medicine
  • guidelines
  • mechanical ventilation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults : An Official American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: Inspiratory Pressure Augmentation During Spontaneous Breathing Trials, Protocols Minimizing Sedation, and Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately After Extubation. / Ouellette, Daniel R.; Patel, Sheena; Girard, Timothy D.; Morris, Peter E.; Schmidt, Gregory A.; Truwit, Jonathon D.; Alhazzani, Waleed; Burns, Suzanne M.; Epstein, Scott K.; Esteban, Andres; Fan, Eddy; Ferrer, Miguel; Fraser, Gilles L.; Gong, Michelle Ng; Hough, Catherine L.; Mehta, Sangeeta; Nanchal, Rahul; Pawlik, Amy J.; Schweickert, William D.; Sessler, Curtis N.; Strøm, Thomas; Kress, John P.

In: Chest, Vol. 151, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 166-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ouellette, DR, Patel, S, Girard, TD, Morris, PE, Schmidt, GA, Truwit, JD, Alhazzani, W, Burns, SM, Epstein, SK, Esteban, A, Fan, E, Ferrer, M, Fraser, GL, Gong, MN, Hough, CL, Mehta, S, Nanchal, R, Pawlik, AJ, Schweickert, WD, Sessler, CN, Strøm, T & Kress, JP 2017, 'Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults: An Official American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: Inspiratory Pressure Augmentation During Spontaneous Breathing Trials, Protocols Minimizing Sedation, and Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately After Extubation', Chest, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 166-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.036
Ouellette, Daniel R. ; Patel, Sheena ; Girard, Timothy D. ; Morris, Peter E. ; Schmidt, Gregory A. ; Truwit, Jonathon D. ; Alhazzani, Waleed ; Burns, Suzanne M. ; Epstein, Scott K. ; Esteban, Andres ; Fan, Eddy ; Ferrer, Miguel ; Fraser, Gilles L. ; Gong, Michelle Ng ; Hough, Catherine L. ; Mehta, Sangeeta ; Nanchal, Rahul ; Pawlik, Amy J. ; Schweickert, William D. ; Sessler, Curtis N. ; Strøm, Thomas ; Kress, John P. / Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults : An Official American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: Inspiratory Pressure Augmentation During Spontaneous Breathing Trials, Protocols Minimizing Sedation, and Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately After Extubation. In: Chest. 2017 ; Vol. 151, No. 1. pp. 166-180.
@article{9f564838fbe74535a68a840884c5ae1e,
title = "Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults: An Official American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: Inspiratory Pressure Augmentation During Spontaneous Breathing Trials, Protocols Minimizing Sedation, and Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately After Extubation",
abstract = "Background An update of evidence-based guidelines concerning liberation from mechanical ventilation is needed as new evidence has become available. The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) have collaborated to provide recommendations to clinicians concerning liberation from the ventilator. Methods Comprehensive evidence syntheses, including meta-analyses, were performed to summarize all available evidence relevant to the guideline panel's questions. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and the results were summarized in evidence profiles. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations developed and approved by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation. Results Recommendations for three population, intervention, comparator, outcome (PICO) questions concerning ventilator liberation are presented in this document. The guideline panel considered the balance of desirable (benefits) and undesirable (burdens, adverse effects, costs) consequences, quality of evidence, feasibility, and acceptability of various interventions with respect to the selected questions. Conditional (weak) recommendations were made to use inspiratory pressure augmentation in the initial spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and to use protocols to minimize sedation for patients ventilated for more than 24 h. A strong recommendation was made to use preventive noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for high-risk patients ventilated for more than 24 h immediately after extubation to improve selected outcomes. The recommendations were limited by the quality of the available evidence. Conclusions The guideline panel provided recommendations for inspiratory pressure augmentation during an initial SBT, protocols minimizing sedation, and preventative NIV, in relation to ventilator liberation.",
keywords = "evidence-based medicine, guidelines, mechanical ventilation",
author = "Ouellette, {Daniel R.} and Sheena Patel and Girard, {Timothy D.} and Morris, {Peter E.} and Schmidt, {Gregory A.} and Truwit, {Jonathon D.} and Waleed Alhazzani and Burns, {Suzanne M.} and Epstein, {Scott K.} and Andres Esteban and Eddy Fan and Miguel Ferrer and Fraser, {Gilles L.} and Gong, {Michelle Ng} and Hough, {Catherine L.} and Sangeeta Mehta and Rahul Nanchal and Pawlik, {Amy J.} and Schweickert, {William D.} and Sessler, {Curtis N.} and Thomas Str{\o}m and Kress, {John P.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "151",
pages = "166--180",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults

T2 - An Official American College of Chest Physicians/American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: Inspiratory Pressure Augmentation During Spontaneous Breathing Trials, Protocols Minimizing Sedation, and Noninvasive Ventilation Immediately After Extubation

AU - Ouellette, Daniel R.

AU - Patel, Sheena

AU - Girard, Timothy D.

AU - Morris, Peter E.

AU - Schmidt, Gregory A.

AU - Truwit, Jonathon D.

AU - Alhazzani, Waleed

AU - Burns, Suzanne M.

AU - Epstein, Scott K.

AU - Esteban, Andres

AU - Fan, Eddy

AU - Ferrer, Miguel

AU - Fraser, Gilles L.

AU - Gong, Michelle Ng

AU - Hough, Catherine L.

AU - Mehta, Sangeeta

AU - Nanchal, Rahul

AU - Pawlik, Amy J.

AU - Schweickert, William D.

AU - Sessler, Curtis N.

AU - Strøm, Thomas

AU - Kress, John P.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background An update of evidence-based guidelines concerning liberation from mechanical ventilation is needed as new evidence has become available. The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) have collaborated to provide recommendations to clinicians concerning liberation from the ventilator. Methods Comprehensive evidence syntheses, including meta-analyses, were performed to summarize all available evidence relevant to the guideline panel's questions. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and the results were summarized in evidence profiles. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations developed and approved by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation. Results Recommendations for three population, intervention, comparator, outcome (PICO) questions concerning ventilator liberation are presented in this document. The guideline panel considered the balance of desirable (benefits) and undesirable (burdens, adverse effects, costs) consequences, quality of evidence, feasibility, and acceptability of various interventions with respect to the selected questions. Conditional (weak) recommendations were made to use inspiratory pressure augmentation in the initial spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and to use protocols to minimize sedation for patients ventilated for more than 24 h. A strong recommendation was made to use preventive noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for high-risk patients ventilated for more than 24 h immediately after extubation to improve selected outcomes. The recommendations were limited by the quality of the available evidence. Conclusions The guideline panel provided recommendations for inspiratory pressure augmentation during an initial SBT, protocols minimizing sedation, and preventative NIV, in relation to ventilator liberation.

AB - Background An update of evidence-based guidelines concerning liberation from mechanical ventilation is needed as new evidence has become available. The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) have collaborated to provide recommendations to clinicians concerning liberation from the ventilator. Methods Comprehensive evidence syntheses, including meta-analyses, were performed to summarize all available evidence relevant to the guideline panel's questions. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and the results were summarized in evidence profiles. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations developed and approved by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in mechanical ventilation. Results Recommendations for three population, intervention, comparator, outcome (PICO) questions concerning ventilator liberation are presented in this document. The guideline panel considered the balance of desirable (benefits) and undesirable (burdens, adverse effects, costs) consequences, quality of evidence, feasibility, and acceptability of various interventions with respect to the selected questions. Conditional (weak) recommendations were made to use inspiratory pressure augmentation in the initial spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and to use protocols to minimize sedation for patients ventilated for more than 24 h. A strong recommendation was made to use preventive noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for high-risk patients ventilated for more than 24 h immediately after extubation to improve selected outcomes. The recommendations were limited by the quality of the available evidence. Conclusions The guideline panel provided recommendations for inspiratory pressure augmentation during an initial SBT, protocols minimizing sedation, and preventative NIV, in relation to ventilator liberation.

KW - evidence-based medicine

KW - guidelines

KW - mechanical ventilation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009760484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009760484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.036

DO - 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.036

M3 - Article

C2 - 27818331

AN - SCOPUS:85009760484

VL - 151

SP - 166

EP - 180

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 1

ER -