TY - JOUR
T1 - Left and right ventricular functional dynamics determined by echocardiograms before and after lung transplantation
AU - Kato, Tomoko S.
AU - Armstrong, Hilary F.
AU - Schulze, P. Christian
AU - Lippel, Matthew
AU - Amano, Atsushi
AU - Farr, Maryjane
AU - Bacchetta, Matthew
AU - Bartels, Matthew N.
AU - Di Tullio, Marco R.
AU - Homma, Shunichi
AU - Mancini, Donna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/8/15
Y1 - 2015/8/15
N2 - Impaired cardiac function is considered a contraindication for lung transplantation (LT). Because right ventricular (RV) function is expected to improve after LT, poor left ventricular (LV) function is often the determinant for LT eligibility. However, the changes in cardiac function before and after LT have not yet been elucidated. Therefore, we reviewed echocardiograms obtained from 67 recipients before and after LT. In a subset of 49 patients, both RV and LV longitudinal strains based on 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography were analyzed. The cardiopulmonary exercise tests were also reviewed. All patients showed significant improvements in their exercise capacity after LT. RV echo parameters improved in all patients after LT (RV fractional area change: 36.7 ± 5.6% to 41.5 ± 2.7%, RV strain: -15.5 ± 2.9% to -18.0 ± 2.1%, RV E/E′: 8.4 ± 1.8 to 7.7 ± 1.8; all p <0.05). Overall, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) did not change (58.7 ± 6.0% to 57.5 ± 9.7%, p = 0.385); however, 20 patients (30%) showed >10% decrease in LVEF after LT (61.5 ± 6.1% to 47.3 ± 4.2%, p <0.001) and an increase in LV E/E′ (11.8 ± 1.8 to 12.9 ± 2.2, p = 0.049). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that pre-LT LV E/E′ was associated with decrease in LVEF after LT (odds ratio 1.381, 95% confidence interval 1.010 to 1.947, p = 0.043). Furthermore, patients with strain data showed that lower pre-LT LV strain was independently associated with LVEF decrease after LT (odds ratio 1.293, 95% confidence interval 1.088 to 1.614, p = 0.002). Although RV function improves after LT, LV systolic and diastolic functions deteriorate in a sizable proportion of patients. Impaired LV diastolic function before transplant appears to increase the risk of LVEF deterioration after LT.
AB - Impaired cardiac function is considered a contraindication for lung transplantation (LT). Because right ventricular (RV) function is expected to improve after LT, poor left ventricular (LV) function is often the determinant for LT eligibility. However, the changes in cardiac function before and after LT have not yet been elucidated. Therefore, we reviewed echocardiograms obtained from 67 recipients before and after LT. In a subset of 49 patients, both RV and LV longitudinal strains based on 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography were analyzed. The cardiopulmonary exercise tests were also reviewed. All patients showed significant improvements in their exercise capacity after LT. RV echo parameters improved in all patients after LT (RV fractional area change: 36.7 ± 5.6% to 41.5 ± 2.7%, RV strain: -15.5 ± 2.9% to -18.0 ± 2.1%, RV E/E′: 8.4 ± 1.8 to 7.7 ± 1.8; all p <0.05). Overall, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) did not change (58.7 ± 6.0% to 57.5 ± 9.7%, p = 0.385); however, 20 patients (30%) showed >10% decrease in LVEF after LT (61.5 ± 6.1% to 47.3 ± 4.2%, p <0.001) and an increase in LV E/E′ (11.8 ± 1.8 to 12.9 ± 2.2, p = 0.049). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that pre-LT LV E/E′ was associated with decrease in LVEF after LT (odds ratio 1.381, 95% confidence interval 1.010 to 1.947, p = 0.043). Furthermore, patients with strain data showed that lower pre-LT LV strain was independently associated with LVEF decrease after LT (odds ratio 1.293, 95% confidence interval 1.088 to 1.614, p = 0.002). Although RV function improves after LT, LV systolic and diastolic functions deteriorate in a sizable proportion of patients. Impaired LV diastolic function before transplant appears to increase the risk of LVEF deterioration after LT.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938205555&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938205555&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.027
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 26089014
AN - SCOPUS:84938205555
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 116
SP - 652
EP - 659
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 4
ER -