Lead Aprons Are a Lead Exposure Hazard

Kevin M. Burns, Jamie M. Shoag, Sukhraj S. Kahlon, Patrick J. Parsons, Polly E. Bijur, Benjamin H. Taragin, Morri E. Markowitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether lead-containing shields have lead dust on the external surface. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this descriptive study of a convenience sample of 172 shields. Each shield was tested for external lead dust via a qualitative rapid on-site test and a laboratory-based quantitative dust wipe analysis, flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). The χ2 test was used to test the association with age, type of shield, lead sheet thickness, storage method, and visual and radiographic appearance. Results: Sixty-three percent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56%-70%) of the shields had detectable surface lead by FAAS and 50% (95% CI: 43%-57%) by the qualitative method. Lead dust by FAAS ranged from undetectable to 998 μg/ft2. The quantitative detection of lead was significantly associated with the following: (1) visual appearance of the shield (1 = best, 3 = worst): 88% of shields that scored 3 had detectable dust lead; (2) type of shield: a greater proportion of the pediatric patient, full-body, and thyroid shields were positive than vests and skirts; (3) use of a hanger for storage: 27% of shields on a hanger were positive versus 67% not on hangers. Radiographic determination of shield intactness, thickness of interior lead sheets, and age of shield were unrelated to presence of surface dust lead. Conclusions: Sixty-three percent of shields had detectable surface lead that was associated with visual appearance, type of shield, and storage method. Lead-containing shields are a newly identified, potentially widespread source of lead exposure in the health industry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Dust
Spectrum Analysis
Lead
Confidence Intervals
Research Ethics Committees
Industry
Thyroid Gland
Pediatrics
Health

Keywords

  • Occupational safety
  • Patient safety
  • Radiation protection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Lead Aprons Are a Lead Exposure Hazard. / Burns, Kevin M.; Shoag, Jamie M.; Kahlon, Sukhraj S.; Parsons, Patrick J.; Bijur, Polly E.; Taragin, Benjamin H.; Markowitz, Morri E.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burns, Kevin M. ; Shoag, Jamie M. ; Kahlon, Sukhraj S. ; Parsons, Patrick J. ; Bijur, Polly E. ; Taragin, Benjamin H. ; Markowitz, Morri E. / Lead Aprons Are a Lead Exposure Hazard. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2016.
@article{189c7450ff3e43c7b5ca78dec83318fb,
title = "Lead Aprons Are a Lead Exposure Hazard",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine whether lead-containing shields have lead dust on the external surface. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this descriptive study of a convenience sample of 172 shields. Each shield was tested for external lead dust via a qualitative rapid on-site test and a laboratory-based quantitative dust wipe analysis, flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). The χ2 test was used to test the association with age, type of shield, lead sheet thickness, storage method, and visual and radiographic appearance. Results: Sixty-three percent (95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: 56{\%}-70{\%}) of the shields had detectable surface lead by FAAS and 50{\%} (95{\%} CI: 43{\%}-57{\%}) by the qualitative method. Lead dust by FAAS ranged from undetectable to 998 μg/ft2. The quantitative detection of lead was significantly associated with the following: (1) visual appearance of the shield (1 = best, 3 = worst): 88{\%} of shields that scored 3 had detectable dust lead; (2) type of shield: a greater proportion of the pediatric patient, full-body, and thyroid shields were positive than vests and skirts; (3) use of a hanger for storage: 27{\%} of shields on a hanger were positive versus 67{\%} not on hangers. Radiographic determination of shield intactness, thickness of interior lead sheets, and age of shield were unrelated to presence of surface dust lead. Conclusions: Sixty-three percent of shields had detectable surface lead that was associated with visual appearance, type of shield, and storage method. Lead-containing shields are a newly identified, potentially widespread source of lead exposure in the health industry.",
keywords = "Occupational safety, Patient safety, Radiation protection",
author = "Burns, {Kevin M.} and Shoag, {Jamie M.} and Kahlon, {Sukhraj S.} and Parsons, {Patrick J.} and Bijur, {Polly E.} and Taragin, {Benjamin H.} and Markowitz, {Morri E.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.024",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lead Aprons Are a Lead Exposure Hazard

AU - Burns, Kevin M.

AU - Shoag, Jamie M.

AU - Kahlon, Sukhraj S.

AU - Parsons, Patrick J.

AU - Bijur, Polly E.

AU - Taragin, Benjamin H.

AU - Markowitz, Morri E.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose: To determine whether lead-containing shields have lead dust on the external surface. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this descriptive study of a convenience sample of 172 shields. Each shield was tested for external lead dust via a qualitative rapid on-site test and a laboratory-based quantitative dust wipe analysis, flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). The χ2 test was used to test the association with age, type of shield, lead sheet thickness, storage method, and visual and radiographic appearance. Results: Sixty-three percent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56%-70%) of the shields had detectable surface lead by FAAS and 50% (95% CI: 43%-57%) by the qualitative method. Lead dust by FAAS ranged from undetectable to 998 μg/ft2. The quantitative detection of lead was significantly associated with the following: (1) visual appearance of the shield (1 = best, 3 = worst): 88% of shields that scored 3 had detectable dust lead; (2) type of shield: a greater proportion of the pediatric patient, full-body, and thyroid shields were positive than vests and skirts; (3) use of a hanger for storage: 27% of shields on a hanger were positive versus 67% not on hangers. Radiographic determination of shield intactness, thickness of interior lead sheets, and age of shield were unrelated to presence of surface dust lead. Conclusions: Sixty-three percent of shields had detectable surface lead that was associated with visual appearance, type of shield, and storage method. Lead-containing shields are a newly identified, potentially widespread source of lead exposure in the health industry.

AB - Purpose: To determine whether lead-containing shields have lead dust on the external surface. Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this descriptive study of a convenience sample of 172 shields. Each shield was tested for external lead dust via a qualitative rapid on-site test and a laboratory-based quantitative dust wipe analysis, flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). The χ2 test was used to test the association with age, type of shield, lead sheet thickness, storage method, and visual and radiographic appearance. Results: Sixty-three percent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56%-70%) of the shields had detectable surface lead by FAAS and 50% (95% CI: 43%-57%) by the qualitative method. Lead dust by FAAS ranged from undetectable to 998 μg/ft2. The quantitative detection of lead was significantly associated with the following: (1) visual appearance of the shield (1 = best, 3 = worst): 88% of shields that scored 3 had detectable dust lead; (2) type of shield: a greater proportion of the pediatric patient, full-body, and thyroid shields were positive than vests and skirts; (3) use of a hanger for storage: 27% of shields on a hanger were positive versus 67% not on hangers. Radiographic determination of shield intactness, thickness of interior lead sheets, and age of shield were unrelated to presence of surface dust lead. Conclusions: Sixty-three percent of shields had detectable surface lead that was associated with visual appearance, type of shield, and storage method. Lead-containing shields are a newly identified, potentially widespread source of lead exposure in the health industry.

KW - Occupational safety

KW - Patient safety

KW - Radiation protection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009230391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009230391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.024

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.024

M3 - Article

C2 - 28082154

AN - SCOPUS:85009230391

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

ER -