Just Culture

Practical Implementation for Radiologist Peer Review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Peer review is a cornerstone of quality improvement programs and serves to support the peer learning process. Peer review in radiology incorporates the review of diagnostic imaging interpretation, interventional procedures, communication, and the evaluation of untoward patient events. A just culture is an environment in which errors and near-miss events are evaluated in a deliberately nonpunitive framework, avoiding a culture of blame and responsibility and focusing instead on error prevention and fostering a culture of continuous quality improvement. Adoption of a just culture requires careful attention to detail and relies on continuous coaching of individuals and teams to ensure future systems improvements and a culture of safety. The authors describe the practical implementation of a just culture framework for peer review in an academic radiology department and highlight its application to interpretive, noninterpretive, and procedural domains through case examples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Peer Review
Quality Improvement
Radiology
Safety Management
Foster Home Care
Diagnostic Imaging
Communication
Learning
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Just culture
  • peer learning
  • peer review
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{bf0a1a0b2f674f0097f09c3045256267,
title = "Just Culture: Practical Implementation for Radiologist Peer Review",
abstract = "Peer review is a cornerstone of quality improvement programs and serves to support the peer learning process. Peer review in radiology incorporates the review of diagnostic imaging interpretation, interventional procedures, communication, and the evaluation of untoward patient events. A just culture is an environment in which errors and near-miss events are evaluated in a deliberately nonpunitive framework, avoiding a culture of blame and responsibility and focusing instead on error prevention and fostering a culture of continuous quality improvement. Adoption of a just culture requires careful attention to detail and relies on continuous coaching of individuals and teams to ensure future systems improvements and a culture of safety. The authors describe the practical implementation of a just culture framework for peer review in an academic radiology department and highlight its application to interpretive, noninterpretive, and procedural domains through case examples.",
keywords = "Just culture, peer learning, peer review, quality improvement",
author = "Judah Burns and Miller, {Todd S.} and Weiss, {Jeffrey M.} and Erdfarb, {Amichai J.} and David Silber and Goldberg-Stein, {Shlomit A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2018.10.021",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Just Culture

T2 - Practical Implementation for Radiologist Peer Review

AU - Burns, Judah

AU - Miller, Todd S.

AU - Weiss, Jeffrey M.

AU - Erdfarb, Amichai J.

AU - Silber, David

AU - Goldberg-Stein, Shlomit A.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Peer review is a cornerstone of quality improvement programs and serves to support the peer learning process. Peer review in radiology incorporates the review of diagnostic imaging interpretation, interventional procedures, communication, and the evaluation of untoward patient events. A just culture is an environment in which errors and near-miss events are evaluated in a deliberately nonpunitive framework, avoiding a culture of blame and responsibility and focusing instead on error prevention and fostering a culture of continuous quality improvement. Adoption of a just culture requires careful attention to detail and relies on continuous coaching of individuals and teams to ensure future systems improvements and a culture of safety. The authors describe the practical implementation of a just culture framework for peer review in an academic radiology department and highlight its application to interpretive, noninterpretive, and procedural domains through case examples.

AB - Peer review is a cornerstone of quality improvement programs and serves to support the peer learning process. Peer review in radiology incorporates the review of diagnostic imaging interpretation, interventional procedures, communication, and the evaluation of untoward patient events. A just culture is an environment in which errors and near-miss events are evaluated in a deliberately nonpunitive framework, avoiding a culture of blame and responsibility and focusing instead on error prevention and fostering a culture of continuous quality improvement. Adoption of a just culture requires careful attention to detail and relies on continuous coaching of individuals and teams to ensure future systems improvements and a culture of safety. The authors describe the practical implementation of a just culture framework for peer review in an academic radiology department and highlight its application to interpretive, noninterpretive, and procedural domains through case examples.

KW - Just culture

KW - peer learning

KW - peer review

KW - quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058820669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058820669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.10.021

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.10.021

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

ER -