"it's Better in a Group Anyway"

Patient Experiences of Group and Individual Acupuncture

Elizabeth J. Chuang, Noa Hashai, Michele Buonora, Jonathan Gabison, Benjamin Kligler, Melissa D. McKee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic pain is prevalent, burdensome, and costly, and there are ethnic and racial disparities in treatment. Acupuncture is effective and safe, but access is limited. Group acupuncture can decrease cost and increase capacity by decreasing clinic space needs and increasing patient volume per acupuncturist; however, the effectiveness and patient acceptability of group and individual session acupuncture have never been directly compared. Design: The Acupuncture Approaches to Decrease Disparities in Pain Treatment (AADDOPT-2) study is a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of acupuncture for chronic pain. Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with a subset of patients enrolled in the trial. Settings/Location: Outpatient clinics in an urban, low income area serving a primarily black and Hispanic population. Subjects: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 46 patients; 23 in each arm of the AADDOPT-2 study. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either individual acupuncture or acupuncture delivered in a small group. Outcome measures: Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using an inductive thematic framework to explore and compare the patient experience in group and individual settings. Results: Patients in both study arms valued the pain relief, improved quality of life, and relaxation experienced during acupuncture. Privacy and mixed-sex groups were cited as a concern by a minority of patients; however, most of those randomized to the group setting noted that these concerns abated after initiating treatment. Differences between arms included the depth of the relationship with the acupuncturist and misgivings related to the treatment space. Group dynamics varied; some groups fostered a supportive, therapeutic interaction, while others were more reserved. Conclusions: Patients in both arms valued their acupuncture experience. Participants described both positive and negative aspects of the group setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)336-342
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Acupuncture
Interviews
Chronic Pain
Therapeutics
Pain
Privacy
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Hispanic Americans
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • acupuncture
  • chronic pain
  • musculoskeletal pain
  • osteoarthritis
  • qualitative methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

"it's Better in a Group Anyway" : Patient Experiences of Group and Individual Acupuncture. / Chuang, Elizabeth J.; Hashai, Noa; Buonora, Michele; Gabison, Jonathan; Kligler, Benjamin; McKee, Melissa D.

In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 336-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chuang, Elizabeth J. ; Hashai, Noa ; Buonora, Michele ; Gabison, Jonathan ; Kligler, Benjamin ; McKee, Melissa D. / "it's Better in a Group Anyway" : Patient Experiences of Group and Individual Acupuncture. In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 336-342.
@article{e32310c09f19453598c602e86204bb03,
title = "{"}it's Better in a Group Anyway{"}: Patient Experiences of Group and Individual Acupuncture",
abstract = "Objectives: Chronic pain is prevalent, burdensome, and costly, and there are ethnic and racial disparities in treatment. Acupuncture is effective and safe, but access is limited. Group acupuncture can decrease cost and increase capacity by decreasing clinic space needs and increasing patient volume per acupuncturist; however, the effectiveness and patient acceptability of group and individual session acupuncture have never been directly compared. Design: The Acupuncture Approaches to Decrease Disparities in Pain Treatment (AADDOPT-2) study is a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of acupuncture for chronic pain. Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with a subset of patients enrolled in the trial. Settings/Location: Outpatient clinics in an urban, low income area serving a primarily black and Hispanic population. Subjects: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 46 patients; 23 in each arm of the AADDOPT-2 study. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either individual acupuncture or acupuncture delivered in a small group. Outcome measures: Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using an inductive thematic framework to explore and compare the patient experience in group and individual settings. Results: Patients in both study arms valued the pain relief, improved quality of life, and relaxation experienced during acupuncture. Privacy and mixed-sex groups were cited as a concern by a minority of patients; however, most of those randomized to the group setting noted that these concerns abated after initiating treatment. Differences between arms included the depth of the relationship with the acupuncturist and misgivings related to the treatment space. Group dynamics varied; some groups fostered a supportive, therapeutic interaction, while others were more reserved. Conclusions: Patients in both arms valued their acupuncture experience. Participants described both positive and negative aspects of the group setting.",
keywords = "acupuncture, chronic pain, musculoskeletal pain, osteoarthritis, qualitative methods",
author = "Chuang, {Elizabeth J.} and Noa Hashai and Michele Buonora and Jonathan Gabison and Benjamin Kligler and McKee, {Melissa D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/acm.2017.0262",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "336--342",
journal = "Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine",
issn = "1075-5535",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "it's Better in a Group Anyway"

T2 - Patient Experiences of Group and Individual Acupuncture

AU - Chuang, Elizabeth J.

AU - Hashai, Noa

AU - Buonora, Michele

AU - Gabison, Jonathan

AU - Kligler, Benjamin

AU - McKee, Melissa D.

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Objectives: Chronic pain is prevalent, burdensome, and costly, and there are ethnic and racial disparities in treatment. Acupuncture is effective and safe, but access is limited. Group acupuncture can decrease cost and increase capacity by decreasing clinic space needs and increasing patient volume per acupuncturist; however, the effectiveness and patient acceptability of group and individual session acupuncture have never been directly compared. Design: The Acupuncture Approaches to Decrease Disparities in Pain Treatment (AADDOPT-2) study is a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of acupuncture for chronic pain. Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with a subset of patients enrolled in the trial. Settings/Location: Outpatient clinics in an urban, low income area serving a primarily black and Hispanic population. Subjects: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 46 patients; 23 in each arm of the AADDOPT-2 study. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either individual acupuncture or acupuncture delivered in a small group. Outcome measures: Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using an inductive thematic framework to explore and compare the patient experience in group and individual settings. Results: Patients in both study arms valued the pain relief, improved quality of life, and relaxation experienced during acupuncture. Privacy and mixed-sex groups were cited as a concern by a minority of patients; however, most of those randomized to the group setting noted that these concerns abated after initiating treatment. Differences between arms included the depth of the relationship with the acupuncturist and misgivings related to the treatment space. Group dynamics varied; some groups fostered a supportive, therapeutic interaction, while others were more reserved. Conclusions: Patients in both arms valued their acupuncture experience. Participants described both positive and negative aspects of the group setting.

AB - Objectives: Chronic pain is prevalent, burdensome, and costly, and there are ethnic and racial disparities in treatment. Acupuncture is effective and safe, but access is limited. Group acupuncture can decrease cost and increase capacity by decreasing clinic space needs and increasing patient volume per acupuncturist; however, the effectiveness and patient acceptability of group and individual session acupuncture have never been directly compared. Design: The Acupuncture Approaches to Decrease Disparities in Pain Treatment (AADDOPT-2) study is a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of acupuncture for chronic pain. Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with a subset of patients enrolled in the trial. Settings/Location: Outpatient clinics in an urban, low income area serving a primarily black and Hispanic population. Subjects: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 46 patients; 23 in each arm of the AADDOPT-2 study. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either individual acupuncture or acupuncture delivered in a small group. Outcome measures: Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using an inductive thematic framework to explore and compare the patient experience in group and individual settings. Results: Patients in both study arms valued the pain relief, improved quality of life, and relaxation experienced during acupuncture. Privacy and mixed-sex groups were cited as a concern by a minority of patients; however, most of those randomized to the group setting noted that these concerns abated after initiating treatment. Differences between arms included the depth of the relationship with the acupuncturist and misgivings related to the treatment space. Group dynamics varied; some groups fostered a supportive, therapeutic interaction, while others were more reserved. Conclusions: Patients in both arms valued their acupuncture experience. Participants described both positive and negative aspects of the group setting.

KW - acupuncture

KW - chronic pain

KW - musculoskeletal pain

KW - osteoarthritis

KW - qualitative methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045849953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045849953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/acm.2017.0262

DO - 10.1089/acm.2017.0262

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 336

EP - 342

JO - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

JF - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

SN - 1075-5535

IS - 4

ER -