It made my life a little easier: Primary care providers' beliefs and attitudes about using opioid treatment agreements

Joanna L. Starrels, Bryan Wu, Deena Peyser, Aaron D. Fox, Abigail Batchelder, Frances K. Barg, Julia H. Arnsten, Chinazo O. Cunningham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To understand primary care providers (PCPs)' experiences, beliefs, and attitudes about using opioid treatment agreements (OTAs) for patients with chronic pain. Design: Qualitative research study. Participants: Twenty-eight internists and family medicine physicians at two health centers. Approach: Semistructured telephone interviews, informed by the Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction. Themes were analyzed using a Grounded Theory approach, and similarities and differences in themes were examined among OTA adopters, nonadopters, and selective adopters. Results: Participants were 64 percent female and 68 percent white, and practiced for a mean of 9.5 years. Adoption of OTAs varied: seven were adopters, five were nonadopters, and 16 were selective adopters. OTA adoption reflected PCPs' beliefs and attitudes in the following three thematic categories: 1) perceived effect of OTA use on the therapeutic alliance, 2) beliefs about the utility of OTAs for patients or providers, and 3) perception of patients' risk for opioid misuse. PCPs commonly believed that OTAs were useful for physician self-protection, but few believed that they prevent opioid misuse. Selective adopters expressed ambivalent beliefs and made decisions about OTA use for individual patients based on both observed data and a subjective sense of each patient's risk for misuse. Conclusions: Substantial variability in PCP use of OTAs reflects differences in PCP beliefs and attitudes. Research to understand the impact of OTA use on providers, patients, and the therapeutic alliance is urgently needed to guide best practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-102
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Opioid Management
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Opioid Analgesics
Primary Health Care
Therapeutics
Qualitative Research
Family Physicians
Therapeutic Uses
Practice Guidelines
Chronic Pain
Medicine
Interviews
Physicians

Keywords

  • Agreement
  • Chronic pain
  • Contract
  • Opioid analgesics
  • Opioid misuse
  • Physician perspective

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

It made my life a little easier : Primary care providers' beliefs and attitudes about using opioid treatment agreements. / Starrels, Joanna L.; Wu, Bryan; Peyser, Deena; Fox, Aaron D.; Batchelder, Abigail; Barg, Frances K.; Arnsten, Julia H.; Cunningham, Chinazo O.

In: Journal of Opioid Management, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2014, p. 95-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{28786c7ce2ac4f73a6a7b20df94fcd48,
title = "It made my life a little easier: Primary care providers' beliefs and attitudes about using opioid treatment agreements",
abstract = "Objective: To understand primary care providers (PCPs)' experiences, beliefs, and attitudes about using opioid treatment agreements (OTAs) for patients with chronic pain. Design: Qualitative research study. Participants: Twenty-eight internists and family medicine physicians at two health centers. Approach: Semistructured telephone interviews, informed by the Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction. Themes were analyzed using a Grounded Theory approach, and similarities and differences in themes were examined among OTA adopters, nonadopters, and selective adopters. Results: Participants were 64 percent female and 68 percent white, and practiced for a mean of 9.5 years. Adoption of OTAs varied: seven were adopters, five were nonadopters, and 16 were selective adopters. OTA adoption reflected PCPs' beliefs and attitudes in the following three thematic categories: 1) perceived effect of OTA use on the therapeutic alliance, 2) beliefs about the utility of OTAs for patients or providers, and 3) perception of patients' risk for opioid misuse. PCPs commonly believed that OTAs were useful for physician self-protection, but few believed that they prevent opioid misuse. Selective adopters expressed ambivalent beliefs and made decisions about OTA use for individual patients based on both observed data and a subjective sense of each patient's risk for misuse. Conclusions: Substantial variability in PCP use of OTAs reflects differences in PCP beliefs and attitudes. Research to understand the impact of OTA use on providers, patients, and the therapeutic alliance is urgently needed to guide best practices.",
keywords = "Agreement, Chronic pain, Contract, Opioid analgesics, Opioid misuse, Physician perspective",
author = "Starrels, {Joanna L.} and Bryan Wu and Deena Peyser and Fox, {Aaron D.} and Abigail Batchelder and Barg, {Frances K.} and Arnsten, {Julia H.} and Cunningham, {Chinazo O.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5055/jom.2014.0198",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "95--102",
journal = "Journal of Opioid Management",
issn = "1551-7489",
publisher = "Weston Medical Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It made my life a little easier

T2 - Primary care providers' beliefs and attitudes about using opioid treatment agreements

AU - Starrels, Joanna L.

AU - Wu, Bryan

AU - Peyser, Deena

AU - Fox, Aaron D.

AU - Batchelder, Abigail

AU - Barg, Frances K.

AU - Arnsten, Julia H.

AU - Cunningham, Chinazo O.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: To understand primary care providers (PCPs)' experiences, beliefs, and attitudes about using opioid treatment agreements (OTAs) for patients with chronic pain. Design: Qualitative research study. Participants: Twenty-eight internists and family medicine physicians at two health centers. Approach: Semistructured telephone interviews, informed by the Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction. Themes were analyzed using a Grounded Theory approach, and similarities and differences in themes were examined among OTA adopters, nonadopters, and selective adopters. Results: Participants were 64 percent female and 68 percent white, and practiced for a mean of 9.5 years. Adoption of OTAs varied: seven were adopters, five were nonadopters, and 16 were selective adopters. OTA adoption reflected PCPs' beliefs and attitudes in the following three thematic categories: 1) perceived effect of OTA use on the therapeutic alliance, 2) beliefs about the utility of OTAs for patients or providers, and 3) perception of patients' risk for opioid misuse. PCPs commonly believed that OTAs were useful for physician self-protection, but few believed that they prevent opioid misuse. Selective adopters expressed ambivalent beliefs and made decisions about OTA use for individual patients based on both observed data and a subjective sense of each patient's risk for misuse. Conclusions: Substantial variability in PCP use of OTAs reflects differences in PCP beliefs and attitudes. Research to understand the impact of OTA use on providers, patients, and the therapeutic alliance is urgently needed to guide best practices.

AB - Objective: To understand primary care providers (PCPs)' experiences, beliefs, and attitudes about using opioid treatment agreements (OTAs) for patients with chronic pain. Design: Qualitative research study. Participants: Twenty-eight internists and family medicine physicians at two health centers. Approach: Semistructured telephone interviews, informed by the Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction. Themes were analyzed using a Grounded Theory approach, and similarities and differences in themes were examined among OTA adopters, nonadopters, and selective adopters. Results: Participants were 64 percent female and 68 percent white, and practiced for a mean of 9.5 years. Adoption of OTAs varied: seven were adopters, five were nonadopters, and 16 were selective adopters. OTA adoption reflected PCPs' beliefs and attitudes in the following three thematic categories: 1) perceived effect of OTA use on the therapeutic alliance, 2) beliefs about the utility of OTAs for patients or providers, and 3) perception of patients' risk for opioid misuse. PCPs commonly believed that OTAs were useful for physician self-protection, but few believed that they prevent opioid misuse. Selective adopters expressed ambivalent beliefs and made decisions about OTA use for individual patients based on both observed data and a subjective sense of each patient's risk for misuse. Conclusions: Substantial variability in PCP use of OTAs reflects differences in PCP beliefs and attitudes. Research to understand the impact of OTA use on providers, patients, and the therapeutic alliance is urgently needed to guide best practices.

KW - Agreement

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Contract

KW - Opioid analgesics

KW - Opioid misuse

KW - Physician perspective

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899869745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899869745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5055/jom.2014.0198

DO - 10.5055/jom.2014.0198

M3 - Article

C2 - 24715664

AN - SCOPUS:84899869745

VL - 10

SP - 95

EP - 102

JO - Journal of Opioid Management

JF - Journal of Opioid Management

SN - 1551-7489

IS - 2

ER -