Isoform-specific lidocaine block of sodium channels explained by differences in gating

H. Bradley Nuss, Nicholas Kambouris, Eduardo Marbán, Gordon F. Tomaselli, Jeffrey R. Balser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When depolarized from typical resting membrane potentials (V(rest) ~ - 90 mV), cardiac sodium (Na) currents are more sensitive to local anesthetics than brain or skeletal muscle Na currents. When expressed in Xenopus oocytes, lidocaine block of hH1 (human cardiac) Na current greatly exceeded that of μ1 (rat skeletal muscle) at membrane potentials near V(rest), whereas hyperpolarization to -140 mV equalized block of the two isoforms. Because the isoform-specific tonic block roughly parallels the drug-free voltage dependence of channel availability, isoform differences in the voltage dependence of fast inactivation could underlie the differences in block. However, after a brief (50 ms) depolarizing pulse, recovery from lidocaine block is similar for the two isoforms despite marked kinetic differences in drug-free recovery, suggesting that differences in fast inactivation cannot entirely explain the isoform difference in lidocaine action. Given the strong coupling between fast inactivation and other gating processes linked to depolarization (activation, slow inactivation), we considered the possibility that isoform differences in lidocaine block are explained by differences in these other gating processes. In whole-cell recordings from HEK-293 cells, the voltage dependence of hH1 current activation was ~20 mV more negative than that of μ1. Because activation and closed-state inactivation are positively coupled, these differences in activation were sufficient to shift hH1 availability to more negative membrane potentials. A mutant channel with enhanced closed-state inactivation gating (μ1-R1441C) exhibited increased lidocaine sensitivity, emphasizing the importance of closed-state inactivation in lidocaine action. Moreover, when the depolarization was prolonged to 1 s, recovery from a 'slow' inactivated state with intermediate kinetics (I(M)) was fourfold longer in hH1 than in μ1, and recovery from lidocaine block in hH1 was similarly delayed relative to μ1. We propose that gating processes coupled to fast inactivation (activation and slow inactivation) are the key determinants of isoform-specific local anesthetic action.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)200-210
Number of pages11
JournalBiophysical Journal
Volume78
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sodium Channels
Lidocaine
Protein Isoforms
Membrane Potentials
Local Anesthetics
Skeletal Muscle
HEK293 Cells
Patch-Clamp Techniques
Xenopus
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Oocytes
Sodium
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics

Cite this

Isoform-specific lidocaine block of sodium channels explained by differences in gating. / Nuss, H. Bradley; Kambouris, Nicholas; Marbán, Eduardo; Tomaselli, Gordon F.; Balser, Jeffrey R.

In: Biophysical Journal, Vol. 78, No. 1, 01.01.2000, p. 200-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nuss, H. Bradley ; Kambouris, Nicholas ; Marbán, Eduardo ; Tomaselli, Gordon F. ; Balser, Jeffrey R. / Isoform-specific lidocaine block of sodium channels explained by differences in gating. In: Biophysical Journal. 2000 ; Vol. 78, No. 1. pp. 200-210.
@article{aade7dce39fe42939ab56ade947ab8d2,
title = "Isoform-specific lidocaine block of sodium channels explained by differences in gating",
abstract = "When depolarized from typical resting membrane potentials (V(rest) ~ - 90 mV), cardiac sodium (Na) currents are more sensitive to local anesthetics than brain or skeletal muscle Na currents. When expressed in Xenopus oocytes, lidocaine block of hH1 (human cardiac) Na current greatly exceeded that of μ1 (rat skeletal muscle) at membrane potentials near V(rest), whereas hyperpolarization to -140 mV equalized block of the two isoforms. Because the isoform-specific tonic block roughly parallels the drug-free voltage dependence of channel availability, isoform differences in the voltage dependence of fast inactivation could underlie the differences in block. However, after a brief (50 ms) depolarizing pulse, recovery from lidocaine block is similar for the two isoforms despite marked kinetic differences in drug-free recovery, suggesting that differences in fast inactivation cannot entirely explain the isoform difference in lidocaine action. Given the strong coupling between fast inactivation and other gating processes linked to depolarization (activation, slow inactivation), we considered the possibility that isoform differences in lidocaine block are explained by differences in these other gating processes. In whole-cell recordings from HEK-293 cells, the voltage dependence of hH1 current activation was ~20 mV more negative than that of μ1. Because activation and closed-state inactivation are positively coupled, these differences in activation were sufficient to shift hH1 availability to more negative membrane potentials. A mutant channel with enhanced closed-state inactivation gating (μ1-R1441C) exhibited increased lidocaine sensitivity, emphasizing the importance of closed-state inactivation in lidocaine action. Moreover, when the depolarization was prolonged to 1 s, recovery from a 'slow' inactivated state with intermediate kinetics (I(M)) was fourfold longer in hH1 than in μ1, and recovery from lidocaine block in hH1 was similarly delayed relative to μ1. We propose that gating processes coupled to fast inactivation (activation and slow inactivation) are the key determinants of isoform-specific local anesthetic action.",
author = "Nuss, {H. Bradley} and Nicholas Kambouris and Eduardo Marb{\'a}n and Tomaselli, {Gordon F.} and Balser, {Jeffrey R.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76585-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "200--210",
journal = "Biophysical Journal",
issn = "0006-3495",
publisher = "Biophysical Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Isoform-specific lidocaine block of sodium channels explained by differences in gating

AU - Nuss, H. Bradley

AU - Kambouris, Nicholas

AU - Marbán, Eduardo

AU - Tomaselli, Gordon F.

AU - Balser, Jeffrey R.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - When depolarized from typical resting membrane potentials (V(rest) ~ - 90 mV), cardiac sodium (Na) currents are more sensitive to local anesthetics than brain or skeletal muscle Na currents. When expressed in Xenopus oocytes, lidocaine block of hH1 (human cardiac) Na current greatly exceeded that of μ1 (rat skeletal muscle) at membrane potentials near V(rest), whereas hyperpolarization to -140 mV equalized block of the two isoforms. Because the isoform-specific tonic block roughly parallels the drug-free voltage dependence of channel availability, isoform differences in the voltage dependence of fast inactivation could underlie the differences in block. However, after a brief (50 ms) depolarizing pulse, recovery from lidocaine block is similar for the two isoforms despite marked kinetic differences in drug-free recovery, suggesting that differences in fast inactivation cannot entirely explain the isoform difference in lidocaine action. Given the strong coupling between fast inactivation and other gating processes linked to depolarization (activation, slow inactivation), we considered the possibility that isoform differences in lidocaine block are explained by differences in these other gating processes. In whole-cell recordings from HEK-293 cells, the voltage dependence of hH1 current activation was ~20 mV more negative than that of μ1. Because activation and closed-state inactivation are positively coupled, these differences in activation were sufficient to shift hH1 availability to more negative membrane potentials. A mutant channel with enhanced closed-state inactivation gating (μ1-R1441C) exhibited increased lidocaine sensitivity, emphasizing the importance of closed-state inactivation in lidocaine action. Moreover, when the depolarization was prolonged to 1 s, recovery from a 'slow' inactivated state with intermediate kinetics (I(M)) was fourfold longer in hH1 than in μ1, and recovery from lidocaine block in hH1 was similarly delayed relative to μ1. We propose that gating processes coupled to fast inactivation (activation and slow inactivation) are the key determinants of isoform-specific local anesthetic action.

AB - When depolarized from typical resting membrane potentials (V(rest) ~ - 90 mV), cardiac sodium (Na) currents are more sensitive to local anesthetics than brain or skeletal muscle Na currents. When expressed in Xenopus oocytes, lidocaine block of hH1 (human cardiac) Na current greatly exceeded that of μ1 (rat skeletal muscle) at membrane potentials near V(rest), whereas hyperpolarization to -140 mV equalized block of the two isoforms. Because the isoform-specific tonic block roughly parallels the drug-free voltage dependence of channel availability, isoform differences in the voltage dependence of fast inactivation could underlie the differences in block. However, after a brief (50 ms) depolarizing pulse, recovery from lidocaine block is similar for the two isoforms despite marked kinetic differences in drug-free recovery, suggesting that differences in fast inactivation cannot entirely explain the isoform difference in lidocaine action. Given the strong coupling between fast inactivation and other gating processes linked to depolarization (activation, slow inactivation), we considered the possibility that isoform differences in lidocaine block are explained by differences in these other gating processes. In whole-cell recordings from HEK-293 cells, the voltage dependence of hH1 current activation was ~20 mV more negative than that of μ1. Because activation and closed-state inactivation are positively coupled, these differences in activation were sufficient to shift hH1 availability to more negative membrane potentials. A mutant channel with enhanced closed-state inactivation gating (μ1-R1441C) exhibited increased lidocaine sensitivity, emphasizing the importance of closed-state inactivation in lidocaine action. Moreover, when the depolarization was prolonged to 1 s, recovery from a 'slow' inactivated state with intermediate kinetics (I(M)) was fourfold longer in hH1 than in μ1, and recovery from lidocaine block in hH1 was similarly delayed relative to μ1. We propose that gating processes coupled to fast inactivation (activation and slow inactivation) are the key determinants of isoform-specific local anesthetic action.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034127170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034127170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76585-4

DO - 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76585-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 10620286

AN - SCOPUS:0034127170

VL - 78

SP - 200

EP - 210

JO - Biophysical Journal

JF - Biophysical Journal

SN - 0006-3495

IS - 1

ER -