Is weight loss better sustained with long-limb gastric bypass in the super-obese?

Mohammad Sarhan, Jenny J. Choi, Monqidh Al Sawwaf, Ghulam Murtaza, Jorge L Zelada Getty, Leaque Ahmed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: While some studies have shown that long-limb gastric bypass with Roux limb length of 150 to 200 cm can attain better weight loss outcomes in super-obese patients (BMI >50 kg/m 2) than the standard limb gastric bypass with Roux limb length of 100 to 150 cm, other studies have not shown similar findings. Additionally, no study has demonstrated the optimal length of the Roux limb that will result in ideal weight loss. The purpose of this study is to compare the long-term weight loss and weight regain of standard limb length (SLL) and long limb length (LLL) gastric bypass in patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2. Methods: A total of 120 patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2 underwent either SLL (total bypass length∈=∈200, biliopancreatic limb∈=∈50-80 cm, Roux limb∈=∈120-150 cm) or LLL (total bypass length = 250 biliopancreatic limb∈=∈50-80 cm, Roux limb∈=∈170-200 cm) RYGB. The excess weight loss (EWL), the weight regain, and the rate of complications were measured at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up. Statistical comparisons were performed using t-test. Results: There was no difference in patient demographics, pre-operative BMI, or comorbidities between the two groups: SLL (n∈=∈55) and LLL (n∈=∈65). In comparing standard- to long-limb cohorts, preoperative BMI was 56.1 ±5.34 vs. 57.5∈±∈6.05 kg/m 2, respectively. There was no statistical difference in percent EWL at 1, 2, and 3 years between the two groups [55.2 vs. 55 (P∈=∈0.933), 61.5 vs. 60.8 (P∈=∈0.831), and 61.1 vs.60 (P∈=∈0.932)]. There was no difference in percent weight regain between the two groups, 11.2 (SLL) and 5.2 (LLL) (P∈=∈0.13). The rates of complications were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: There is no difference in weight loss or weight regain between the SLL and LLL RYGB. Longer-limb gastric bypass is not required in patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2 for them to obtain long-term, sustained weight loss.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1337-1343
Number of pages7
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gastric Bypass
Weight Loss
Extremities
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Excess weight loss
  • Gastric bypass
  • Roux limb
  • Weight regain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Is weight loss better sustained with long-limb gastric bypass in the super-obese? / Sarhan, Mohammad; Choi, Jenny J.; Al Sawwaf, Monqidh; Murtaza, Ghulam; Getty, Jorge L Zelada; Ahmed, Leaque.

In: Obesity Surgery, Vol. 21, No. 9, 09.2011, p. 1337-1343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sarhan, M, Choi, JJ, Al Sawwaf, M, Murtaza, G, Getty, JLZ & Ahmed, L 2011, 'Is weight loss better sustained with long-limb gastric bypass in the super-obese?', Obesity Surgery, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1337-1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-011-0402-5
Sarhan, Mohammad ; Choi, Jenny J. ; Al Sawwaf, Monqidh ; Murtaza, Ghulam ; Getty, Jorge L Zelada ; Ahmed, Leaque. / Is weight loss better sustained with long-limb gastric bypass in the super-obese?. In: Obesity Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 21, No. 9. pp. 1337-1343.
@article{89ac82998eee4f7289b0773520d68822,
title = "Is weight loss better sustained with long-limb gastric bypass in the super-obese?",
abstract = "Background: While some studies have shown that long-limb gastric bypass with Roux limb length of 150 to 200 cm can attain better weight loss outcomes in super-obese patients (BMI >50 kg/m 2) than the standard limb gastric bypass with Roux limb length of 100 to 150 cm, other studies have not shown similar findings. Additionally, no study has demonstrated the optimal length of the Roux limb that will result in ideal weight loss. The purpose of this study is to compare the long-term weight loss and weight regain of standard limb length (SLL) and long limb length (LLL) gastric bypass in patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2. Methods: A total of 120 patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2 underwent either SLL (total bypass length∈=∈200, biliopancreatic limb∈=∈50-80 cm, Roux limb∈=∈120-150 cm) or LLL (total bypass length = 250 biliopancreatic limb∈=∈50-80 cm, Roux limb∈=∈170-200 cm) RYGB. The excess weight loss (EWL), the weight regain, and the rate of complications were measured at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up. Statistical comparisons were performed using t-test. Results: There was no difference in patient demographics, pre-operative BMI, or comorbidities between the two groups: SLL (n∈=∈55) and LLL (n∈=∈65). In comparing standard- to long-limb cohorts, preoperative BMI was 56.1 ±5.34 vs. 57.5∈±∈6.05 kg/m 2, respectively. There was no statistical difference in percent EWL at 1, 2, and 3 years between the two groups [55.2 vs. 55 (P∈=∈0.933), 61.5 vs. 60.8 (P∈=∈0.831), and 61.1 vs.60 (P∈=∈0.932)]. There was no difference in percent weight regain between the two groups, 11.2 (SLL) and 5.2 (LLL) (P∈=∈0.13). The rates of complications were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: There is no difference in weight loss or weight regain between the SLL and LLL RYGB. Longer-limb gastric bypass is not required in patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2 for them to obtain long-term, sustained weight loss.",
keywords = "Excess weight loss, Gastric bypass, Roux limb, Weight regain",
author = "Mohammad Sarhan and Choi, {Jenny J.} and {Al Sawwaf}, Monqidh and Ghulam Murtaza and Getty, {Jorge L Zelada} and Leaque Ahmed",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11695-011-0402-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1337--1343",
journal = "Obesity Surgery",
issn = "0960-8923",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is weight loss better sustained with long-limb gastric bypass in the super-obese?

AU - Sarhan, Mohammad

AU - Choi, Jenny J.

AU - Al Sawwaf, Monqidh

AU - Murtaza, Ghulam

AU - Getty, Jorge L Zelada

AU - Ahmed, Leaque

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Background: While some studies have shown that long-limb gastric bypass with Roux limb length of 150 to 200 cm can attain better weight loss outcomes in super-obese patients (BMI >50 kg/m 2) than the standard limb gastric bypass with Roux limb length of 100 to 150 cm, other studies have not shown similar findings. Additionally, no study has demonstrated the optimal length of the Roux limb that will result in ideal weight loss. The purpose of this study is to compare the long-term weight loss and weight regain of standard limb length (SLL) and long limb length (LLL) gastric bypass in patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2. Methods: A total of 120 patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2 underwent either SLL (total bypass length∈=∈200, biliopancreatic limb∈=∈50-80 cm, Roux limb∈=∈120-150 cm) or LLL (total bypass length = 250 biliopancreatic limb∈=∈50-80 cm, Roux limb∈=∈170-200 cm) RYGB. The excess weight loss (EWL), the weight regain, and the rate of complications were measured at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up. Statistical comparisons were performed using t-test. Results: There was no difference in patient demographics, pre-operative BMI, or comorbidities between the two groups: SLL (n∈=∈55) and LLL (n∈=∈65). In comparing standard- to long-limb cohorts, preoperative BMI was 56.1 ±5.34 vs. 57.5∈±∈6.05 kg/m 2, respectively. There was no statistical difference in percent EWL at 1, 2, and 3 years between the two groups [55.2 vs. 55 (P∈=∈0.933), 61.5 vs. 60.8 (P∈=∈0.831), and 61.1 vs.60 (P∈=∈0.932)]. There was no difference in percent weight regain between the two groups, 11.2 (SLL) and 5.2 (LLL) (P∈=∈0.13). The rates of complications were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: There is no difference in weight loss or weight regain between the SLL and LLL RYGB. Longer-limb gastric bypass is not required in patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2 for them to obtain long-term, sustained weight loss.

AB - Background: While some studies have shown that long-limb gastric bypass with Roux limb length of 150 to 200 cm can attain better weight loss outcomes in super-obese patients (BMI >50 kg/m 2) than the standard limb gastric bypass with Roux limb length of 100 to 150 cm, other studies have not shown similar findings. Additionally, no study has demonstrated the optimal length of the Roux limb that will result in ideal weight loss. The purpose of this study is to compare the long-term weight loss and weight regain of standard limb length (SLL) and long limb length (LLL) gastric bypass in patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2. Methods: A total of 120 patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2 underwent either SLL (total bypass length∈=∈200, biliopancreatic limb∈=∈50-80 cm, Roux limb∈=∈120-150 cm) or LLL (total bypass length = 250 biliopancreatic limb∈=∈50-80 cm, Roux limb∈=∈170-200 cm) RYGB. The excess weight loss (EWL), the weight regain, and the rate of complications were measured at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up. Statistical comparisons were performed using t-test. Results: There was no difference in patient demographics, pre-operative BMI, or comorbidities between the two groups: SLL (n∈=∈55) and LLL (n∈=∈65). In comparing standard- to long-limb cohorts, preoperative BMI was 56.1 ±5.34 vs. 57.5∈±∈6.05 kg/m 2, respectively. There was no statistical difference in percent EWL at 1, 2, and 3 years between the two groups [55.2 vs. 55 (P∈=∈0.933), 61.5 vs. 60.8 (P∈=∈0.831), and 61.1 vs.60 (P∈=∈0.932)]. There was no difference in percent weight regain between the two groups, 11.2 (SLL) and 5.2 (LLL) (P∈=∈0.13). The rates of complications were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: There is no difference in weight loss or weight regain between the SLL and LLL RYGB. Longer-limb gastric bypass is not required in patients with BMI >50 kg/m 2 for them to obtain long-term, sustained weight loss.

KW - Excess weight loss

KW - Gastric bypass

KW - Roux limb

KW - Weight regain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052373912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052373912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11695-011-0402-5

DO - 10.1007/s11695-011-0402-5

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 1337

EP - 1343

JO - Obesity Surgery

JF - Obesity Surgery

SN - 0960-8923

IS - 9

ER -