Is the length of follow-up evaluation in published reports on the treatment of infrainguinal occlusive disease decreasing?

Nicholas J. Gargiulo, David J. O'Connor, Jeffrey E. Indes, Elyssa Feinberg, Evan C. Lipsitz, William D. Suggs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: There is increasing pressure for the rapid development and implementation of new techniques and procedures. This study examined whether or not there has been a trend toward increasingly short follow-up times for studies evaluating the treatment of lower-extremity occlusive disease. Methods: A search was performed of PubMed using the term "femoropopliteal occlusive disease" from 1976 to 2006. Reports describing the open and/or endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease were classified according to the number of patients, method of treatment, and follow-up time. Results: A total of 103 of the 435 reports met the inclusion criteria. Average follow-up times from 1976 to 1986 were a mean of 43.3 months and a median of 38.8 months, from 1986 to 1996 were a mean of 32.4 months and a median of 16.9 months, from 1996 to 2006 were a mean of 22.6 months and a median of 16.5 months. Conclusions: The number of reports on femoropopliteal occlusive disease treatment has increased. The length of follow-up period was 2- to 3-fold longer for reports on open procedures compared with those on endovascular procedures. Whether length of follow-up evaluation and reporting intervals should be standardized warrants further investigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-183
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume202
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2011

Keywords

  • Femoropopliteal
  • Follow-up period

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is the length of follow-up evaluation in published reports on the treatment of infrainguinal occlusive disease decreasing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this