Is seizure frequency variance a predictable quantity?

Daniel M. Goldenholz, Shira R. Goldenholz, Robert Moss, Jacqueline French, Daniel Lowenstein, Ruben Kuzniecky, Sheryl R. Haut, Sabrina Cristofaro, Kamil Detyniecki, John Hixson, Philippa Karoly, Mark Cook, Alex Strashny, William H. Theodore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is currently no formal method for predicting the range expected in an individual's seizure counts. Having access to such a prediction would be of benefit for developing more efficient clinical trials, but also for improving clinical care in the outpatient setting. Methods: Using three independently collected patient diary datasets, we explored the predictability of seizure frequency. Three independent seizure diary databases were explored: SeizureTracker (n = 3016), Human Epilepsy Project (n = 93), and NeuroVista (n = 15). First, the relationship between mean and standard deviation in seizure frequency was assessed. Using that relationship, a prediction for the range of possible seizure frequencies was compared with a traditional prediction scheme commonly used in clinical trials. A validation dataset was obtained from a separate data export of SeizureTracker to further verify the predictions. Results: A consistent mathematical relationship was observed across datasets. The logarithm of the average seizure count was linearly related to the logarithm of the standard deviation with a high correlation (R2 > 0.83). The three datasets showed high predictive accuracy for this log–log relationship of 94%, compared with a predictive accuracy of 77% for a traditional prediction scheme. The independent validation set showed that the log–log predicted 94% of the correct ranges while the RR50 predicted 77%. Conclusion: Reliably predicting seizure frequency variability is straightforward based on knowledge of mean seizure frequency, across several datasets. With further study, this may help to increase the power of RCTs, and guide clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)201-207
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Seizures
Clinical Trials
Ambulatory Care
Epilepsy
Datasets
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Goldenholz, D. M., Goldenholz, S. R., Moss, R., French, J., Lowenstein, D., Kuzniecky, R., ... Theodore, W. H. (2018). Is seizure frequency variance a predictable quantity? Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, 5(2), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.519

Is seizure frequency variance a predictable quantity? / Goldenholz, Daniel M.; Goldenholz, Shira R.; Moss, Robert; French, Jacqueline; Lowenstein, Daniel; Kuzniecky, Ruben; Haut, Sheryl R.; Cristofaro, Sabrina; Detyniecki, Kamil; Hixson, John; Karoly, Philippa; Cook, Mark; Strashny, Alex; Theodore, William H.

In: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 201-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goldenholz, DM, Goldenholz, SR, Moss, R, French, J, Lowenstein, D, Kuzniecky, R, Haut, SR, Cristofaro, S, Detyniecki, K, Hixson, J, Karoly, P, Cook, M, Strashny, A & Theodore, WH 2018, 'Is seizure frequency variance a predictable quantity?', Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.519
Goldenholz DM, Goldenholz SR, Moss R, French J, Lowenstein D, Kuzniecky R et al. Is seizure frequency variance a predictable quantity? Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. 2018 Feb 1;5(2):201-207. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.519
Goldenholz, Daniel M. ; Goldenholz, Shira R. ; Moss, Robert ; French, Jacqueline ; Lowenstein, Daniel ; Kuzniecky, Ruben ; Haut, Sheryl R. ; Cristofaro, Sabrina ; Detyniecki, Kamil ; Hixson, John ; Karoly, Philippa ; Cook, Mark ; Strashny, Alex ; Theodore, William H. / Is seizure frequency variance a predictable quantity?. In: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. 2018 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 201-207.
@article{542ee8dea50a4d8bb0132f5a1b6a471d,
title = "Is seizure frequency variance a predictable quantity?",
abstract = "Background: There is currently no formal method for predicting the range expected in an individual's seizure counts. Having access to such a prediction would be of benefit for developing more efficient clinical trials, but also for improving clinical care in the outpatient setting. Methods: Using three independently collected patient diary datasets, we explored the predictability of seizure frequency. Three independent seizure diary databases were explored: SeizureTracker (n = 3016), Human Epilepsy Project (n = 93), and NeuroVista (n = 15). First, the relationship between mean and standard deviation in seizure frequency was assessed. Using that relationship, a prediction for the range of possible seizure frequencies was compared with a traditional prediction scheme commonly used in clinical trials. A validation dataset was obtained from a separate data export of SeizureTracker to further verify the predictions. Results: A consistent mathematical relationship was observed across datasets. The logarithm of the average seizure count was linearly related to the logarithm of the standard deviation with a high correlation (R2 > 0.83). The three datasets showed high predictive accuracy for this log–log relationship of 94{\%}, compared with a predictive accuracy of 77{\%} for a traditional prediction scheme. The independent validation set showed that the log–log predicted 94{\%} of the correct ranges while the RR50 predicted 77{\%}. Conclusion: Reliably predicting seizure frequency variability is straightforward based on knowledge of mean seizure frequency, across several datasets. With further study, this may help to increase the power of RCTs, and guide clinical practice.",
author = "Goldenholz, {Daniel M.} and Goldenholz, {Shira R.} and Robert Moss and Jacqueline French and Daniel Lowenstein and Ruben Kuzniecky and Haut, {Sheryl R.} and Sabrina Cristofaro and Kamil Detyniecki and John Hixson and Philippa Karoly and Mark Cook and Alex Strashny and Theodore, {William H.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acn3.519",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "201--207",
journal = "Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology",
issn = "2328-9503",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is seizure frequency variance a predictable quantity?

AU - Goldenholz, Daniel M.

AU - Goldenholz, Shira R.

AU - Moss, Robert

AU - French, Jacqueline

AU - Lowenstein, Daniel

AU - Kuzniecky, Ruben

AU - Haut, Sheryl R.

AU - Cristofaro, Sabrina

AU - Detyniecki, Kamil

AU - Hixson, John

AU - Karoly, Philippa

AU - Cook, Mark

AU - Strashny, Alex

AU - Theodore, William H.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Background: There is currently no formal method for predicting the range expected in an individual's seizure counts. Having access to such a prediction would be of benefit for developing more efficient clinical trials, but also for improving clinical care in the outpatient setting. Methods: Using three independently collected patient diary datasets, we explored the predictability of seizure frequency. Three independent seizure diary databases were explored: SeizureTracker (n = 3016), Human Epilepsy Project (n = 93), and NeuroVista (n = 15). First, the relationship between mean and standard deviation in seizure frequency was assessed. Using that relationship, a prediction for the range of possible seizure frequencies was compared with a traditional prediction scheme commonly used in clinical trials. A validation dataset was obtained from a separate data export of SeizureTracker to further verify the predictions. Results: A consistent mathematical relationship was observed across datasets. The logarithm of the average seizure count was linearly related to the logarithm of the standard deviation with a high correlation (R2 > 0.83). The three datasets showed high predictive accuracy for this log–log relationship of 94%, compared with a predictive accuracy of 77% for a traditional prediction scheme. The independent validation set showed that the log–log predicted 94% of the correct ranges while the RR50 predicted 77%. Conclusion: Reliably predicting seizure frequency variability is straightforward based on knowledge of mean seizure frequency, across several datasets. With further study, this may help to increase the power of RCTs, and guide clinical practice.

AB - Background: There is currently no formal method for predicting the range expected in an individual's seizure counts. Having access to such a prediction would be of benefit for developing more efficient clinical trials, but also for improving clinical care in the outpatient setting. Methods: Using three independently collected patient diary datasets, we explored the predictability of seizure frequency. Three independent seizure diary databases were explored: SeizureTracker (n = 3016), Human Epilepsy Project (n = 93), and NeuroVista (n = 15). First, the relationship between mean and standard deviation in seizure frequency was assessed. Using that relationship, a prediction for the range of possible seizure frequencies was compared with a traditional prediction scheme commonly used in clinical trials. A validation dataset was obtained from a separate data export of SeizureTracker to further verify the predictions. Results: A consistent mathematical relationship was observed across datasets. The logarithm of the average seizure count was linearly related to the logarithm of the standard deviation with a high correlation (R2 > 0.83). The three datasets showed high predictive accuracy for this log–log relationship of 94%, compared with a predictive accuracy of 77% for a traditional prediction scheme. The independent validation set showed that the log–log predicted 94% of the correct ranges while the RR50 predicted 77%. Conclusion: Reliably predicting seizure frequency variability is straightforward based on knowledge of mean seizure frequency, across several datasets. With further study, this may help to increase the power of RCTs, and guide clinical practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042157583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042157583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acn3.519

DO - 10.1002/acn3.519

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042157583

VL - 5

SP - 201

EP - 207

JO - Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology

JF - Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology

SN - 2328-9503

IS - 2

ER -