Abstract
BACKGROUND: The observance during acne follow-ups that information stored within iPLEDGE was discordant with medical charts prompted this study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the information acquired and stored within iPLEDGE as it compares to medical charts with a goal of assessing the efficacy of iPLEDGE as a database. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective chart review analyzing congruence and discrepancies between medical chart documentation and iPLEDGE data for all patients who received at least a single dose of isotretinoin from the primary investigators between January 2006 and November 2010. RESULTS: A total of 357 charts were analyzed. Overall congruence between medical chart documentation and iPLEDGE data was observed in only 73.1% of cases. The discrepancy (N=96) was due to a missed dose (prescription recorded in chart but not in iPLEDGE) in 81.4% of cases, or an addition (medication dispensed per iPLEDGE without corresponding chart documentation) in the remainder of cases. Of note, several charts had multiple discrepancies (N=249 total discrepancies). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective chart review study. CONCLUSION: Given the large percentage of discordant data, our findings question the efficacy of the iPLEDGE system, which is designed to monitor every dispensed isotretinoin dose. D
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 97-102 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Drugs in Dermatology |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - Jan 2016 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Dermatology