iPLEDGE weaknesses: Is it time to address the flaws?

Amanda A. Cyrulnik; Aron J. Gewirtzman; Karin Blecher Paz; Jaimie B. Glick; Anika K. Anam; Daniel A. Carrasco; Alan R. Shalita; Steven R. Cohen

iPLEDGE weaknesses: Is it time to address the flaws?

Amanda A. Cyrulnik, Aron J. Gewirtzman, Karin Blecher Paz, Jaimie B. Glick, Anika K. Anam, Daniel A. Carrasco, Alan R. Shalita, Steven R. Cohen

Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The observance during acne follow-ups that information stored within iPLEDGE was discordant with medical charts prompted this study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the information acquired and stored within iPLEDGE as it compares to medical charts with a goal of assessing the efficacy of iPLEDGE as a database. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective chart review analyzing congruence and discrepancies between medical chart documentation and iPLEDGE data for all patients who received at least a single dose of isotretinoin from the primary investigators between January 2006 and November 2010. RESULTS: A total of 357 charts were analyzed. Overall congruence between medical chart documentation and iPLEDGE data was observed in only 73.1% of cases. The discrepancy (N=96) was due to a missed dose (prescription recorded in chart but not in iPLEDGE) in 81.4% of cases, or an addition (medication dispensed per iPLEDGE without corresponding chart documentation) in the remainder of cases. Of note, several charts had multiple discrepancies (N=249 total discrepancies). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective chart review study. CONCLUSION: Given the large percentage of discordant data, our findings question the efficacy of the iPLEDGE system, which is designed to monitor every dispensed isotretinoin dose. D

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	97-102
Number of pages	6
Journal	Journal of Drugs in Dermatology
Volume	15
Issue number	1
State	Published - Jan 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Dermatology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'iPLEDGE weaknesses: Is it time to address the flaws?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{88eb31aa441d4b2d87cc2d812d641319,

title = "iPLEDGE weaknesses: Is it time to address the flaws?",

abstract = "BACKGROUND: The observance during acne follow-ups that information stored within iPLEDGE was discordant with medical charts prompted this study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the information acquired and stored within iPLEDGE as it compares to medical charts with a goal of assessing the efficacy of iPLEDGE as a database. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective chart review analyzing congruence and discrepancies between medical chart documentation and iPLEDGE data for all patients who received at least a single dose of isotretinoin from the primary investigators between January 2006 and November 2010. RESULTS: A total of 357 charts were analyzed. Overall congruence between medical chart documentation and iPLEDGE data was observed in only 73.1% of cases. The discrepancy (N=96) was due to a missed dose (prescription recorded in chart but not in iPLEDGE) in 81.4% of cases, or an addition (medication dispensed per iPLEDGE without corresponding chart documentation) in the remainder of cases. Of note, several charts had multiple discrepancies (N=249 total discrepancies). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective chart review study. CONCLUSION: Given the large percentage of discordant data, our findings question the efficacy of the iPLEDGE system, which is designed to monitor every dispensed isotretinoin dose. D",

author = "Cyrulnik, {Amanda A.} and Gewirtzman, {Aron J.} and Paz, {Karin Blecher} and Glick, {Jaimie B.} and Anam, {Anika K.} and Carrasco, {Daniel A.} and Shalita, {Alan R.} and Cohen, {Steven R.}",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

language = "English (US)",

volume = "15",

pages = "97--102",

journal = "Journal of Drugs in Dermatology",

issn = "1545-9616",

publisher = "Journal of Drugs in Dermatology",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - iPLEDGE weaknesses

T2 - Is it time to address the flaws?

AU - Cyrulnik, Amanda A.

AU - Gewirtzman, Aron J.

AU - Paz, Karin Blecher

AU - Glick, Jaimie B.

AU - Anam, Anika K.

AU - Carrasco, Daniel A.

AU - Shalita, Alan R.

AU - Cohen, Steven R.

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The observance during acne follow-ups that information stored within iPLEDGE was discordant with medical charts prompted this study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the information acquired and stored within iPLEDGE as it compares to medical charts with a goal of assessing the efficacy of iPLEDGE as a database. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective chart review analyzing congruence and discrepancies between medical chart documentation and iPLEDGE data for all patients who received at least a single dose of isotretinoin from the primary investigators between January 2006 and November 2010. RESULTS: A total of 357 charts were analyzed. Overall congruence between medical chart documentation and iPLEDGE data was observed in only 73.1% of cases. The discrepancy (N=96) was due to a missed dose (prescription recorded in chart but not in iPLEDGE) in 81.4% of cases, or an addition (medication dispensed per iPLEDGE without corresponding chart documentation) in the remainder of cases. Of note, several charts had multiple discrepancies (N=249 total discrepancies). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective chart review study. CONCLUSION: Given the large percentage of discordant data, our findings question the efficacy of the iPLEDGE system, which is designed to monitor every dispensed isotretinoin dose. D

AB - BACKGROUND: The observance during acne follow-ups that information stored within iPLEDGE was discordant with medical charts prompted this study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the information acquired and stored within iPLEDGE as it compares to medical charts with a goal of assessing the efficacy of iPLEDGE as a database. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective chart review analyzing congruence and discrepancies between medical chart documentation and iPLEDGE data for all patients who received at least a single dose of isotretinoin from the primary investigators between January 2006 and November 2010. RESULTS: A total of 357 charts were analyzed. Overall congruence between medical chart documentation and iPLEDGE data was observed in only 73.1% of cases. The discrepancy (N=96) was due to a missed dose (prescription recorded in chart but not in iPLEDGE) in 81.4% of cases, or an addition (medication dispensed per iPLEDGE without corresponding chart documentation) in the remainder of cases. Of note, several charts had multiple discrepancies (N=249 total discrepancies). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective chart review study. CONCLUSION: Given the large percentage of discordant data, our findings question the efficacy of the iPLEDGE system, which is designed to monitor every dispensed isotretinoin dose. D

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020320341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020320341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 26741387

AN - SCOPUS:85020320341

VL - 15

SP - 97

EP - 102

JO - Journal of Drugs in Dermatology

JF - Journal of Drugs in Dermatology

SN - 1545-9616

IS - 1

ER -