Investigating a possible cause of mesh migration during totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair

C. Choy, Kenneth Shapiro, S. Patel, A. Graham, G. Ferzli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In experienced hands, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has a low rate of recurrence, but it still can recur, and a number of reasons for this have been identified. In published studies, the majority of such cases seem to result from inadequate dissection leading to missed hernias or suboptimal mesh placement. But even with adequate dissection and proper placement of a sufficiently large mesh, recurrence sometimes happens. A number of investigators have cited mesh migration or dislocation as a possible cause, and this study examined how hip flexion affects the position of newly placed meshes and staples in totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of inguinal hernia. Methods: After completion of the dissection and reduction of discovered hernias, a 15 × 15-cm polypropylene mesh was placed either unilaterally or bilaterally, as indicated. The preperitoneal space then was desufflated. The operating table, in an extended -20° position during surgery, was placed in a 90° position for approximately 15 s. After reinsufflation, the possibility of mesh migration and folding was investigated. Finally, the mesh was stapled, the table again extended and flexed, and the possibility of mesh migration and staple dislodgement investigated once more. Results: The mesh did not migrate or become displaced from any potential hernia area, nor did any of the staples become dislodged. Conclusions: Concern about mesh migration attributable to patients sitting up immediately after surgery appears to be unfounded, at least according to the findings for the current, small, simulated study group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-525
Number of pages3
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hernia
Dissection
Inguinal Hernia
Operating Tables
Recurrence
Polypropylenes
Herniorrhaphy
Hip
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Investigating a possible cause of mesh migration during totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. / Choy, C.; Shapiro, Kenneth; Patel, S.; Graham, A.; Ferzli, G.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.03.2004, p. 523-525.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ecbfd189a3c54cb382f7cc31c6f6cdc3,
title = "Investigating a possible cause of mesh migration during totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair",
abstract = "Background: In experienced hands, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has a low rate of recurrence, but it still can recur, and a number of reasons for this have been identified. In published studies, the majority of such cases seem to result from inadequate dissection leading to missed hernias or suboptimal mesh placement. But even with adequate dissection and proper placement of a sufficiently large mesh, recurrence sometimes happens. A number of investigators have cited mesh migration or dislocation as a possible cause, and this study examined how hip flexion affects the position of newly placed meshes and staples in totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of inguinal hernia. Methods: After completion of the dissection and reduction of discovered hernias, a 15 × 15-cm polypropylene mesh was placed either unilaterally or bilaterally, as indicated. The preperitoneal space then was desufflated. The operating table, in an extended -20° position during surgery, was placed in a 90° position for approximately 15 s. After reinsufflation, the possibility of mesh migration and folding was investigated. Finally, the mesh was stapled, the table again extended and flexed, and the possibility of mesh migration and staple dislodgement investigated once more. Results: The mesh did not migrate or become displaced from any potential hernia area, nor did any of the staples become dislodged. Conclusions: Concern about mesh migration attributable to patients sitting up immediately after surgery appears to be unfounded, at least according to the findings for the current, small, simulated study group.",
author = "C. Choy and Kenneth Shapiro and S. Patel and A. Graham and G. Ferzli",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-003-8183-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "523--525",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating a possible cause of mesh migration during totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair

AU - Choy, C.

AU - Shapiro, Kenneth

AU - Patel, S.

AU - Graham, A.

AU - Ferzli, G.

PY - 2004/3/1

Y1 - 2004/3/1

N2 - Background: In experienced hands, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has a low rate of recurrence, but it still can recur, and a number of reasons for this have been identified. In published studies, the majority of such cases seem to result from inadequate dissection leading to missed hernias or suboptimal mesh placement. But even with adequate dissection and proper placement of a sufficiently large mesh, recurrence sometimes happens. A number of investigators have cited mesh migration or dislocation as a possible cause, and this study examined how hip flexion affects the position of newly placed meshes and staples in totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of inguinal hernia. Methods: After completion of the dissection and reduction of discovered hernias, a 15 × 15-cm polypropylene mesh was placed either unilaterally or bilaterally, as indicated. The preperitoneal space then was desufflated. The operating table, in an extended -20° position during surgery, was placed in a 90° position for approximately 15 s. After reinsufflation, the possibility of mesh migration and folding was investigated. Finally, the mesh was stapled, the table again extended and flexed, and the possibility of mesh migration and staple dislodgement investigated once more. Results: The mesh did not migrate or become displaced from any potential hernia area, nor did any of the staples become dislodged. Conclusions: Concern about mesh migration attributable to patients sitting up immediately after surgery appears to be unfounded, at least according to the findings for the current, small, simulated study group.

AB - Background: In experienced hands, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has a low rate of recurrence, but it still can recur, and a number of reasons for this have been identified. In published studies, the majority of such cases seem to result from inadequate dissection leading to missed hernias or suboptimal mesh placement. But even with adequate dissection and proper placement of a sufficiently large mesh, recurrence sometimes happens. A number of investigators have cited mesh migration or dislocation as a possible cause, and this study examined how hip flexion affects the position of newly placed meshes and staples in totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of inguinal hernia. Methods: After completion of the dissection and reduction of discovered hernias, a 15 × 15-cm polypropylene mesh was placed either unilaterally or bilaterally, as indicated. The preperitoneal space then was desufflated. The operating table, in an extended -20° position during surgery, was placed in a 90° position for approximately 15 s. After reinsufflation, the possibility of mesh migration and folding was investigated. Finally, the mesh was stapled, the table again extended and flexed, and the possibility of mesh migration and staple dislodgement investigated once more. Results: The mesh did not migrate or become displaced from any potential hernia area, nor did any of the staples become dislodged. Conclusions: Concern about mesh migration attributable to patients sitting up immediately after surgery appears to be unfounded, at least according to the findings for the current, small, simulated study group.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942422635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1942422635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-003-8183-0

DO - 10.1007/s00464-003-8183-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 14752647

AN - SCOPUS:1942422635

VL - 18

SP - 523

EP - 525

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 3

ER -