Intrauterine devices at six months

Does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network

Anita Ravi, Linda Prine, Eve Waltermaurer, Natasha Miller, Susan E. Rubin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) can address high rates of unintended pregnancy among adolescents in the United States by increasing access to intrauterine devices (IUDs) in underserved settings. Despite national guidelines endorsing adolescent use of IUDs, some physicians remain concerned about IUD tolerance and safety in adolescents. Therefore we compared adolescents and adults in a family physician staffed FQHC network with regard to (1) IUD postinsertion experience, (2) device discontinuation, and (3) sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among women < 36 years old who had an IUD inserted in 2011 at a New York City FQHC staffed by family physicians.

Results: We included 684 women (27% adolescents, 73% adults). During the 6-month postinsertion period, 59% of adolescents and 43% of adults initiated IUD-related clinical contact after insertion, most commonly for bleeding changes and pelvic or abdominal pain. There were no significant differences between groups in IUD expulsion or removal or STI rates.

Conclusions: Urban FQHC providers may anticipate that, compared with their adult IUD users, adolescents will initiate more clinical follow-up visits after insertion. Both groups will, however, have similar clinical concerns about, reasons for, and rate of device discontinuation and low STI rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)822-830
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014

Fingerprint

Intrauterine Devices
Medicine
Health
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Family Physicians
Intrauterine Device Expulsion
Equipment Safety
Pregnancy in Adolescence
Equipment and Supplies
Pelvic Pain
Pregnancy Rate
Abdominal Pain
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Guidelines
Hemorrhage
Physicians

Keywords

  • Adolescents
  • Contraception
  • Intrauterine devices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Intrauterine devices at six months : Does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network. / Ravi, Anita; Prine, Linda; Waltermaurer, Eve; Miller, Natasha; Rubin, Susan E.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 6, 01.11.2014, p. 822-830.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ddf4541831c84cd7b352f84d0a3a127e,
title = "Intrauterine devices at six months: Does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network",
abstract = "Background: Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) can address high rates of unintended pregnancy among adolescents in the United States by increasing access to intrauterine devices (IUDs) in underserved settings. Despite national guidelines endorsing adolescent use of IUDs, some physicians remain concerned about IUD tolerance and safety in adolescents. Therefore we compared adolescents and adults in a family physician staffed FQHC network with regard to (1) IUD postinsertion experience, (2) device discontinuation, and (3) sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among women < 36 years old who had an IUD inserted in 2011 at a New York City FQHC staffed by family physicians.Results: We included 684 women (27{\%} adolescents, 73{\%} adults). During the 6-month postinsertion period, 59{\%} of adolescents and 43{\%} of adults initiated IUD-related clinical contact after insertion, most commonly for bleeding changes and pelvic or abdominal pain. There were no significant differences between groups in IUD expulsion or removal or STI rates.Conclusions: Urban FQHC providers may anticipate that, compared with their adult IUD users, adolescents will initiate more clinical follow-up visits after insertion. Both groups will, however, have similar clinical concerns about, reasons for, and rate of device discontinuation and low STI rates.",
keywords = "Adolescents, Contraception, Intrauterine devices",
author = "Anita Ravi and Linda Prine and Eve Waltermaurer and Natasha Miller and Rubin, {Susan E.}",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140091",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "822--830",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intrauterine devices at six months

T2 - Does patient age matter? Results from an urban family medicine federally qualified health center (FQHC) network

AU - Ravi, Anita

AU - Prine, Linda

AU - Waltermaurer, Eve

AU - Miller, Natasha

AU - Rubin, Susan E.

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - Background: Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) can address high rates of unintended pregnancy among adolescents in the United States by increasing access to intrauterine devices (IUDs) in underserved settings. Despite national guidelines endorsing adolescent use of IUDs, some physicians remain concerned about IUD tolerance and safety in adolescents. Therefore we compared adolescents and adults in a family physician staffed FQHC network with regard to (1) IUD postinsertion experience, (2) device discontinuation, and (3) sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among women < 36 years old who had an IUD inserted in 2011 at a New York City FQHC staffed by family physicians.Results: We included 684 women (27% adolescents, 73% adults). During the 6-month postinsertion period, 59% of adolescents and 43% of adults initiated IUD-related clinical contact after insertion, most commonly for bleeding changes and pelvic or abdominal pain. There were no significant differences between groups in IUD expulsion or removal or STI rates.Conclusions: Urban FQHC providers may anticipate that, compared with their adult IUD users, adolescents will initiate more clinical follow-up visits after insertion. Both groups will, however, have similar clinical concerns about, reasons for, and rate of device discontinuation and low STI rates.

AB - Background: Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) can address high rates of unintended pregnancy among adolescents in the United States by increasing access to intrauterine devices (IUDs) in underserved settings. Despite national guidelines endorsing adolescent use of IUDs, some physicians remain concerned about IUD tolerance and safety in adolescents. Therefore we compared adolescents and adults in a family physician staffed FQHC network with regard to (1) IUD postinsertion experience, (2) device discontinuation, and (3) sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among women < 36 years old who had an IUD inserted in 2011 at a New York City FQHC staffed by family physicians.Results: We included 684 women (27% adolescents, 73% adults). During the 6-month postinsertion period, 59% of adolescents and 43% of adults initiated IUD-related clinical contact after insertion, most commonly for bleeding changes and pelvic or abdominal pain. There were no significant differences between groups in IUD expulsion or removal or STI rates.Conclusions: Urban FQHC providers may anticipate that, compared with their adult IUD users, adolescents will initiate more clinical follow-up visits after insertion. Both groups will, however, have similar clinical concerns about, reasons for, and rate of device discontinuation and low STI rates.

KW - Adolescents

KW - Contraception

KW - Intrauterine devices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910682245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84910682245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140091

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140091

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 822

EP - 830

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 6

ER -