Intraocular pressure fluctuations

How much do they matter?

Kuldev Singh, Anurag Shrivastava

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review To review the current literature with regard to the importance of IOP fluctuation/variation as independent risk factors for glaucoma progression. Recent findings There are conflicting reports in the literature assessing the relative importance of 'intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation' and 'mean IOP' as risk factors for glaucoma progression. There has been a trend toward more studies concluding that IOP fluctuation is an important independent risk factor for such progression but there is considerable variability in the quality of such studies. In particular, assumptions regarding causality have created doubt regarding some conclusions. Recent studies have also suggested that we should not abandon mean IOP as the important predictor of glaucoma progression. It should be noted that several analyses pertaining to this subject have emerged from large prospective randomized clinical trials primarily designed to answer other questions. Summary A review of the literature reveals that there is no conclusive evidence that IOP fluctuation/variation are independent risk factors for glaucoma progression. One should not discount the importance of mean IOP as a predictor of such progression. A major factor limiting all analyses pertaining to this issue is the inability to continuously measure IOP and thus optimally assess mean and variability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-87
Number of pages4
JournalCurrent Opinion in Ophthalmology
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Intraocular Pressure
Glaucoma
Causality
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • Fluctuation
  • Intraocular pressure
  • Mean
  • Progression
  • Variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Intraocular pressure fluctuations : How much do they matter? / Singh, Kuldev; Shrivastava, Anurag.

In: Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 84-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e5e1c945b08a47ce99d5b4228dea6564,
title = "Intraocular pressure fluctuations: How much do they matter?",
abstract = "Purpose of review To review the current literature with regard to the importance of IOP fluctuation/variation as independent risk factors for glaucoma progression. Recent findings There are conflicting reports in the literature assessing the relative importance of 'intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation' and 'mean IOP' as risk factors for glaucoma progression. There has been a trend toward more studies concluding that IOP fluctuation is an important independent risk factor for such progression but there is considerable variability in the quality of such studies. In particular, assumptions regarding causality have created doubt regarding some conclusions. Recent studies have also suggested that we should not abandon mean IOP as the important predictor of glaucoma progression. It should be noted that several analyses pertaining to this subject have emerged from large prospective randomized clinical trials primarily designed to answer other questions. Summary A review of the literature reveals that there is no conclusive evidence that IOP fluctuation/variation are independent risk factors for glaucoma progression. One should not discount the importance of mean IOP as a predictor of such progression. A major factor limiting all analyses pertaining to this issue is the inability to continuously measure IOP and thus optimally assess mean and variability.",
keywords = "Fluctuation, Intraocular pressure, Mean, Progression, Variation",
author = "Kuldev Singh and Anurag Shrivastava",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/ICU.0b013e328324e6c4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "84--87",
journal = "Current Opinion in Ophthalmology",
issn = "1040-8738",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraocular pressure fluctuations

T2 - How much do they matter?

AU - Singh, Kuldev

AU - Shrivastava, Anurag

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Purpose of review To review the current literature with regard to the importance of IOP fluctuation/variation as independent risk factors for glaucoma progression. Recent findings There are conflicting reports in the literature assessing the relative importance of 'intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation' and 'mean IOP' as risk factors for glaucoma progression. There has been a trend toward more studies concluding that IOP fluctuation is an important independent risk factor for such progression but there is considerable variability in the quality of such studies. In particular, assumptions regarding causality have created doubt regarding some conclusions. Recent studies have also suggested that we should not abandon mean IOP as the important predictor of glaucoma progression. It should be noted that several analyses pertaining to this subject have emerged from large prospective randomized clinical trials primarily designed to answer other questions. Summary A review of the literature reveals that there is no conclusive evidence that IOP fluctuation/variation are independent risk factors for glaucoma progression. One should not discount the importance of mean IOP as a predictor of such progression. A major factor limiting all analyses pertaining to this issue is the inability to continuously measure IOP and thus optimally assess mean and variability.

AB - Purpose of review To review the current literature with regard to the importance of IOP fluctuation/variation as independent risk factors for glaucoma progression. Recent findings There are conflicting reports in the literature assessing the relative importance of 'intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation' and 'mean IOP' as risk factors for glaucoma progression. There has been a trend toward more studies concluding that IOP fluctuation is an important independent risk factor for such progression but there is considerable variability in the quality of such studies. In particular, assumptions regarding causality have created doubt regarding some conclusions. Recent studies have also suggested that we should not abandon mean IOP as the important predictor of glaucoma progression. It should be noted that several analyses pertaining to this subject have emerged from large prospective randomized clinical trials primarily designed to answer other questions. Summary A review of the literature reveals that there is no conclusive evidence that IOP fluctuation/variation are independent risk factors for glaucoma progression. One should not discount the importance of mean IOP as a predictor of such progression. A major factor limiting all analyses pertaining to this issue is the inability to continuously measure IOP and thus optimally assess mean and variability.

KW - Fluctuation

KW - Intraocular pressure

KW - Mean

KW - Progression

KW - Variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62849085850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62849085850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328324e6c4

DO - 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328324e6c4

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 84

EP - 87

JO - Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

JF - Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

SN - 1040-8738

IS - 2

ER -