Intra-Arrest Induction of Hypothermia via Large-Volume Ice-Cold Saline for Sudden Cardiac Arrest: The New York City Project Hypothermia Experience

John Freese, Charles B. Hall, Elizabeth A. Lancet, Rachel Zeig-Owens, Mark Menegus, Norma Keller, Jeffrey Rabrich, Todd L. Slesinger, Robert A. Silverman, David J. Prezant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Therapeutic hypothermia, the standard for post-resuscitation care of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), is an area that the most recent resuscitation guidelines note "has not been studied adequately." We conducted a two-phase study examining the role of intra-arrest hypothermia for out-of-hospital SCA, first standardizing the resuscitation and transport of patients to resuscitation centers where post-resuscitation hypothermia was required and then initiating hypothermia during out-of-hospital resuscitation efforts. The primary end points were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), sustained ROSC, survival to hospital admission, and survival to discharge. Comparing the cohort of standard hospital-initiated hypothermia (Phase I) with the prehospital-initiated hypothermia via large-volume ice-cold saline (LVICS) infusion (Phase II), no difference was noted for any end point: ROSC (56.4% vs. 53.4%, p = 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.7 to 11.4), sustained ROSC (46.9% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.38; 95% CI: -4.7 to 12.4), hospital admission (44.7% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.13; 95% CI: -1.9 to 15.4), hospital discharge among those surviving to admission (40.0% vs. 28.0%, p = 0.08; 95% CI: -1.5 to 27.8), or neurological outcome among those surviving to discharge (76.0% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.73; 95% CI: -26.9 to 38.7). Patients presenting in ventricular fibrillation were more likely to survive to hospital discharge in both phases, although a trend toward worsened early outcomes (ROSC, sustained ROSC, and survival to admission) with intra-arrest hypothermia was noted in this subgroup. Multivariable regression analyses failed to demonstrate any survival benefit associated with the intra-arrest initiation of hypothermia via LVICS. Our study, the largest study of intra-arrest initiation of hypothermia published to date, failed to demonstrate any effect on survival for out-of-hospital SCA patients, confirming findings of previously published smaller studies. We therefore do not recommend the use of intra-arrest cooling via LVICS infusion as part of routine out-of-hospital SCA resuscitative efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)128-135
Number of pages8
JournalTherapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Sudden Cardiac Death
Ice
Hypothermia
Resuscitation
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Confidence Intervals
Survival
Induced Hypothermia
Ventricular Fibrillation
Regression Analysis
Guidelines

Keywords

  • cardiac arrest
  • emergency medicine
  • hypothermia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Intra-Arrest Induction of Hypothermia via Large-Volume Ice-Cold Saline for Sudden Cardiac Arrest : The New York City Project Hypothermia Experience. / Freese, John; Hall, Charles B.; Lancet, Elizabeth A.; Zeig-Owens, Rachel; Menegus, Mark; Keller, Norma; Rabrich, Jeffrey; Slesinger, Todd L.; Silverman, Robert A.; Prezant, David J.

In: Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.06.2019, p. 128-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{36efff24b0ea4d7595d0e064b172ae81,
title = "Intra-Arrest Induction of Hypothermia via Large-Volume Ice-Cold Saline for Sudden Cardiac Arrest: The New York City Project Hypothermia Experience",
abstract = "Therapeutic hypothermia, the standard for post-resuscitation care of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), is an area that the most recent resuscitation guidelines note {"}has not been studied adequately.{"} We conducted a two-phase study examining the role of intra-arrest hypothermia for out-of-hospital SCA, first standardizing the resuscitation and transport of patients to resuscitation centers where post-resuscitation hypothermia was required and then initiating hypothermia during out-of-hospital resuscitation efforts. The primary end points were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), sustained ROSC, survival to hospital admission, and survival to discharge. Comparing the cohort of standard hospital-initiated hypothermia (Phase I) with the prehospital-initiated hypothermia via large-volume ice-cold saline (LVICS) infusion (Phase II), no difference was noted for any end point: ROSC (56.4{\%} vs. 53.4{\%}, p = 0.51; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: -5.7 to 11.4), sustained ROSC (46.9{\%} vs. 42.8{\%}, p = 0.38; 95{\%} CI: -4.7 to 12.4), hospital admission (44.7{\%} vs. 37.7{\%}, p = 0.13; 95{\%} CI: -1.9 to 15.4), hospital discharge among those surviving to admission (40.0{\%} vs. 28.0{\%}, p = 0.08; 95{\%} CI: -1.5 to 27.8), or neurological outcome among those surviving to discharge (76.0{\%} vs. 71.4{\%}, p = 0.73; 95{\%} CI: -26.9 to 38.7). Patients presenting in ventricular fibrillation were more likely to survive to hospital discharge in both phases, although a trend toward worsened early outcomes (ROSC, sustained ROSC, and survival to admission) with intra-arrest hypothermia was noted in this subgroup. Multivariable regression analyses failed to demonstrate any survival benefit associated with the intra-arrest initiation of hypothermia via LVICS. Our study, the largest study of intra-arrest initiation of hypothermia published to date, failed to demonstrate any effect on survival for out-of-hospital SCA patients, confirming findings of previously published smaller studies. We therefore do not recommend the use of intra-arrest cooling via LVICS infusion as part of routine out-of-hospital SCA resuscitative efforts.",
keywords = "cardiac arrest, emergency medicine, hypothermia",
author = "John Freese and Hall, {Charles B.} and Lancet, {Elizabeth A.} and Rachel Zeig-Owens and Mark Menegus and Norma Keller and Jeffrey Rabrich and Slesinger, {Todd L.} and Silverman, {Robert A.} and Prezant, {David J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/ther.2018.0023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "128--135",
journal = "Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management",
issn = "2153-7658",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intra-Arrest Induction of Hypothermia via Large-Volume Ice-Cold Saline for Sudden Cardiac Arrest

T2 - The New York City Project Hypothermia Experience

AU - Freese, John

AU - Hall, Charles B.

AU - Lancet, Elizabeth A.

AU - Zeig-Owens, Rachel

AU - Menegus, Mark

AU - Keller, Norma

AU - Rabrich, Jeffrey

AU - Slesinger, Todd L.

AU - Silverman, Robert A.

AU - Prezant, David J.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Therapeutic hypothermia, the standard for post-resuscitation care of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), is an area that the most recent resuscitation guidelines note "has not been studied adequately." We conducted a two-phase study examining the role of intra-arrest hypothermia for out-of-hospital SCA, first standardizing the resuscitation and transport of patients to resuscitation centers where post-resuscitation hypothermia was required and then initiating hypothermia during out-of-hospital resuscitation efforts. The primary end points were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), sustained ROSC, survival to hospital admission, and survival to discharge. Comparing the cohort of standard hospital-initiated hypothermia (Phase I) with the prehospital-initiated hypothermia via large-volume ice-cold saline (LVICS) infusion (Phase II), no difference was noted for any end point: ROSC (56.4% vs. 53.4%, p = 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.7 to 11.4), sustained ROSC (46.9% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.38; 95% CI: -4.7 to 12.4), hospital admission (44.7% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.13; 95% CI: -1.9 to 15.4), hospital discharge among those surviving to admission (40.0% vs. 28.0%, p = 0.08; 95% CI: -1.5 to 27.8), or neurological outcome among those surviving to discharge (76.0% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.73; 95% CI: -26.9 to 38.7). Patients presenting in ventricular fibrillation were more likely to survive to hospital discharge in both phases, although a trend toward worsened early outcomes (ROSC, sustained ROSC, and survival to admission) with intra-arrest hypothermia was noted in this subgroup. Multivariable regression analyses failed to demonstrate any survival benefit associated with the intra-arrest initiation of hypothermia via LVICS. Our study, the largest study of intra-arrest initiation of hypothermia published to date, failed to demonstrate any effect on survival for out-of-hospital SCA patients, confirming findings of previously published smaller studies. We therefore do not recommend the use of intra-arrest cooling via LVICS infusion as part of routine out-of-hospital SCA resuscitative efforts.

AB - Therapeutic hypothermia, the standard for post-resuscitation care of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), is an area that the most recent resuscitation guidelines note "has not been studied adequately." We conducted a two-phase study examining the role of intra-arrest hypothermia for out-of-hospital SCA, first standardizing the resuscitation and transport of patients to resuscitation centers where post-resuscitation hypothermia was required and then initiating hypothermia during out-of-hospital resuscitation efforts. The primary end points were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), sustained ROSC, survival to hospital admission, and survival to discharge. Comparing the cohort of standard hospital-initiated hypothermia (Phase I) with the prehospital-initiated hypothermia via large-volume ice-cold saline (LVICS) infusion (Phase II), no difference was noted for any end point: ROSC (56.4% vs. 53.4%, p = 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.7 to 11.4), sustained ROSC (46.9% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.38; 95% CI: -4.7 to 12.4), hospital admission (44.7% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.13; 95% CI: -1.9 to 15.4), hospital discharge among those surviving to admission (40.0% vs. 28.0%, p = 0.08; 95% CI: -1.5 to 27.8), or neurological outcome among those surviving to discharge (76.0% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.73; 95% CI: -26.9 to 38.7). Patients presenting in ventricular fibrillation were more likely to survive to hospital discharge in both phases, although a trend toward worsened early outcomes (ROSC, sustained ROSC, and survival to admission) with intra-arrest hypothermia was noted in this subgroup. Multivariable regression analyses failed to demonstrate any survival benefit associated with the intra-arrest initiation of hypothermia via LVICS. Our study, the largest study of intra-arrest initiation of hypothermia published to date, failed to demonstrate any effect on survival for out-of-hospital SCA patients, confirming findings of previously published smaller studies. We therefore do not recommend the use of intra-arrest cooling via LVICS infusion as part of routine out-of-hospital SCA resuscitative efforts.

KW - cardiac arrest

KW - emergency medicine

KW - hypothermia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067006517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067006517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/ther.2018.0023

DO - 10.1089/ther.2018.0023

M3 - Article

C2 - 30427769

AN - SCOPUS:85067006517

VL - 9

SP - 128

EP - 135

JO - Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management

JF - Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management

SN - 2153-7658

IS - 2

ER -