Interventions to reduce mortality among patients treated in Intensive Care Units

Peter J. Pronovost, Michael L. Rinke, Katherine Emery, Cheryl Dennison, Charles Blackledge, Sean M. Berenholtz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Using sensitivity analysis to estimate the impact, in terms of patient lives, of the failure to use proven therapies known to reduce mortality in critically ill intensive care unit patients. Materials and Methods: We identified high-impact interventions published in the last 5 years in the Journal of the American Medical Association or New England Journal of Medicine, extracted the absolute risk reduction associated with each intervention and gleaned the national incidence of each condition and the percent of the population not receiving the cited therapy from the literature. From this information, we calculated national estimates of the excess deaths from failure to use these therapies. Results: With consistent and appropriate implementation of the 5 cited evidence-based interventions, we found a total of 167,819 lives could be saved per year, with a range of 137,670 to 197,965 lives saved per year. Conclusions: Mistakes of omission are common in the critical care setting and lead to significant preventable mortality. There is a significant gap between the discovery of effective interventions and their use in clinical practice. By viewing the delivery of healthcare as a science and increasing funding for health services research, we may be able to increase the use of effective therapies and, as a result, reduce patient mortality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)158-164
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intensive Care Units
Mortality
Numbers Needed To Treat
New England
Health Services Research
American Medical Association
Therapeutics
Critical Care
Critical Illness
Medicine
Delivery of Health Care
Incidence
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Pronovost, P. J., Rinke, M. L., Emery, K., Dennison, C., Blackledge, C., & Berenholtz, S. M. (2004). Interventions to reduce mortality among patients treated in Intensive Care Units. Journal of Critical Care, 19(3), 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.07.003

Interventions to reduce mortality among patients treated in Intensive Care Units. / Pronovost, Peter J.; Rinke, Michael L.; Emery, Katherine; Dennison, Cheryl; Blackledge, Charles; Berenholtz, Sean M.

In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 19, No. 3, 09.2004, p. 158-164.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pronovost, PJ, Rinke, ML, Emery, K, Dennison, C, Blackledge, C & Berenholtz, SM 2004, 'Interventions to reduce mortality among patients treated in Intensive Care Units', Journal of Critical Care, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.07.003
Pronovost, Peter J. ; Rinke, Michael L. ; Emery, Katherine ; Dennison, Cheryl ; Blackledge, Charles ; Berenholtz, Sean M. / Interventions to reduce mortality among patients treated in Intensive Care Units. In: Journal of Critical Care. 2004 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 158-164.
@article{1ef39397c6694e69b8b1da220f22e1e2,
title = "Interventions to reduce mortality among patients treated in Intensive Care Units",
abstract = "Purpose: Using sensitivity analysis to estimate the impact, in terms of patient lives, of the failure to use proven therapies known to reduce mortality in critically ill intensive care unit patients. Materials and Methods: We identified high-impact interventions published in the last 5 years in the Journal of the American Medical Association or New England Journal of Medicine, extracted the absolute risk reduction associated with each intervention and gleaned the national incidence of each condition and the percent of the population not receiving the cited therapy from the literature. From this information, we calculated national estimates of the excess deaths from failure to use these therapies. Results: With consistent and appropriate implementation of the 5 cited evidence-based interventions, we found a total of 167,819 lives could be saved per year, with a range of 137,670 to 197,965 lives saved per year. Conclusions: Mistakes of omission are common in the critical care setting and lead to significant preventable mortality. There is a significant gap between the discovery of effective interventions and their use in clinical practice. By viewing the delivery of healthcare as a science and increasing funding for health services research, we may be able to increase the use of effective therapies and, as a result, reduce patient mortality.",
author = "Pronovost, {Peter J.} and Rinke, {Michael L.} and Katherine Emery and Cheryl Dennison and Charles Blackledge and Berenholtz, {Sean M.}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.07.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "158--164",
journal = "Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "0883-9441",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interventions to reduce mortality among patients treated in Intensive Care Units

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

AU - Rinke, Michael L.

AU - Emery, Katherine

AU - Dennison, Cheryl

AU - Blackledge, Charles

AU - Berenholtz, Sean M.

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - Purpose: Using sensitivity analysis to estimate the impact, in terms of patient lives, of the failure to use proven therapies known to reduce mortality in critically ill intensive care unit patients. Materials and Methods: We identified high-impact interventions published in the last 5 years in the Journal of the American Medical Association or New England Journal of Medicine, extracted the absolute risk reduction associated with each intervention and gleaned the national incidence of each condition and the percent of the population not receiving the cited therapy from the literature. From this information, we calculated national estimates of the excess deaths from failure to use these therapies. Results: With consistent and appropriate implementation of the 5 cited evidence-based interventions, we found a total of 167,819 lives could be saved per year, with a range of 137,670 to 197,965 lives saved per year. Conclusions: Mistakes of omission are common in the critical care setting and lead to significant preventable mortality. There is a significant gap between the discovery of effective interventions and their use in clinical practice. By viewing the delivery of healthcare as a science and increasing funding for health services research, we may be able to increase the use of effective therapies and, as a result, reduce patient mortality.

AB - Purpose: Using sensitivity analysis to estimate the impact, in terms of patient lives, of the failure to use proven therapies known to reduce mortality in critically ill intensive care unit patients. Materials and Methods: We identified high-impact interventions published in the last 5 years in the Journal of the American Medical Association or New England Journal of Medicine, extracted the absolute risk reduction associated with each intervention and gleaned the national incidence of each condition and the percent of the population not receiving the cited therapy from the literature. From this information, we calculated national estimates of the excess deaths from failure to use these therapies. Results: With consistent and appropriate implementation of the 5 cited evidence-based interventions, we found a total of 167,819 lives could be saved per year, with a range of 137,670 to 197,965 lives saved per year. Conclusions: Mistakes of omission are common in the critical care setting and lead to significant preventable mortality. There is a significant gap between the discovery of effective interventions and their use in clinical practice. By viewing the delivery of healthcare as a science and increasing funding for health services research, we may be able to increase the use of effective therapies and, as a result, reduce patient mortality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4644298460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4644298460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.07.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.07.003

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 158

EP - 164

JO - Journal of Critical Care

JF - Journal of Critical Care

SN - 0883-9441

IS - 3

ER -