TY - JOUR
T1 - Interprofessional differences in disposition decisions
T2 - Results from a standardized web-based patient assessment
AU - Gorrindo, Tristan
AU - Goldfarb, Elizabeth
AU - Chevalier, Lydia
AU - Hoeppner, Bettina B.
AU - Birnbaum, Robert J.
AU - Meller, Benjamin
AU - Alpert, Jonathan E.
AU - Herman, John
AU - Weiss, Anthony P.
PY - 2013/8/1
Y1 - 2013/8/1
N2 - Objective: This study examined differences in disposition decisions among mental health professionals using a standardized Web-based simulation. Methods: Using a Webbased simulation that described, across users, the same complex psychiatric patient, credentialed clinicians in a psychiatry department conducted a violence risk assessment and selected a level of followup care. Results: Of 410 clinicians who completed the simulation, 60% of psychiatrists were more likely than other types of clinicians to select higher levels of care (inpatient or emergency services) for the standardized virtual patient (odds ratio52.67, 95% confidence interval51.67-4.25), even after adjustment for other factors. Virtual actions taken, such as contracting with the patient for safety and discussing hospitalization, elucidated these training differences. Conclusions: Training backgrounds were important determinants of clinicians' actions and the dispositions they recommended for a psychiatric patient at high risk of self-harm and harm to others in the educational setting and may suggest the need for further training to standardize and optimize care.
AB - Objective: This study examined differences in disposition decisions among mental health professionals using a standardized Web-based simulation. Methods: Using a Webbased simulation that described, across users, the same complex psychiatric patient, credentialed clinicians in a psychiatry department conducted a violence risk assessment and selected a level of followup care. Results: Of 410 clinicians who completed the simulation, 60% of psychiatrists were more likely than other types of clinicians to select higher levels of care (inpatient or emergency services) for the standardized virtual patient (odds ratio52.67, 95% confidence interval51.67-4.25), even after adjustment for other factors. Virtual actions taken, such as contracting with the patient for safety and discussing hospitalization, elucidated these training differences. Conclusions: Training backgrounds were important determinants of clinicians' actions and the dispositions they recommended for a psychiatric patient at high risk of self-harm and harm to others in the educational setting and may suggest the need for further training to standardize and optimize care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883145283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883145283&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.201200461
DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.201200461
M3 - Article
C2 - 23903607
AN - SCOPUS:84883145283
SN - 1075-2730
VL - 64
SP - 808
EP - 811
JO - Psychiatric Services
JF - Psychiatric Services
IS - 8
ER -