Interprofessional differences in disposition decisions

Results from a standardized web-based patient assessment

Tristan Gorrindo, Elizabeth Goldfarb, Lydia Chevalier, Bettina B. Hoeppner, Robert J. Birnbaum, Benjamin Meller, Jonathan E. Alpert, John Herman, Anthony P. Weiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study examined differences in disposition decisions among mental health professionals using a standardized Web-based simulation. Methods: Using a Webbased simulation that described, across users, the same complex psychiatric patient, credentialed clinicians in a psychiatry department conducted a violence risk assessment and selected a level of followup care. Results: Of 410 clinicians who completed the simulation, 60% of psychiatrists were more likely than other types of clinicians to select higher levels of care (inpatient or emergency services) for the standardized virtual patient (odds ratio52.67, 95% confidence interval51.67-4.25), even after adjustment for other factors. Virtual actions taken, such as contracting with the patient for safety and discussing hospitalization, elucidated these training differences. Conclusions: Training backgrounds were important determinants of clinicians' actions and the dispositions they recommended for a psychiatric patient at high risk of self-harm and harm to others in the educational setting and may suggest the need for further training to standardize and optimize care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)808-811
Number of pages4
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume64
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Patient Safety
Violence
Inpatients
Mental Health
Hospitalization
Emergencies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Gorrindo, T., Goldfarb, E., Chevalier, L., Hoeppner, B. B., Birnbaum, R. J., Meller, B., ... Weiss, A. P. (2013). Interprofessional differences in disposition decisions: Results from a standardized web-based patient assessment. Psychiatric Services, 64(8), 808-811. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201200461

Interprofessional differences in disposition decisions : Results from a standardized web-based patient assessment. / Gorrindo, Tristan; Goldfarb, Elizabeth; Chevalier, Lydia; Hoeppner, Bettina B.; Birnbaum, Robert J.; Meller, Benjamin; Alpert, Jonathan E.; Herman, John; Weiss, Anthony P.

In: Psychiatric Services, Vol. 64, No. 8, 01.08.2013, p. 808-811.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gorrindo, T, Goldfarb, E, Chevalier, L, Hoeppner, BB, Birnbaum, RJ, Meller, B, Alpert, JE, Herman, J & Weiss, AP 2013, 'Interprofessional differences in disposition decisions: Results from a standardized web-based patient assessment', Psychiatric Services, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 808-811. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201200461
Gorrindo, Tristan ; Goldfarb, Elizabeth ; Chevalier, Lydia ; Hoeppner, Bettina B. ; Birnbaum, Robert J. ; Meller, Benjamin ; Alpert, Jonathan E. ; Herman, John ; Weiss, Anthony P. / Interprofessional differences in disposition decisions : Results from a standardized web-based patient assessment. In: Psychiatric Services. 2013 ; Vol. 64, No. 8. pp. 808-811.
@article{4f4c65788307410784b11ca5b3767715,
title = "Interprofessional differences in disposition decisions: Results from a standardized web-based patient assessment",
abstract = "Objective: This study examined differences in disposition decisions among mental health professionals using a standardized Web-based simulation. Methods: Using a Webbased simulation that described, across users, the same complex psychiatric patient, credentialed clinicians in a psychiatry department conducted a violence risk assessment and selected a level of followup care. Results: Of 410 clinicians who completed the simulation, 60{\%} of psychiatrists were more likely than other types of clinicians to select higher levels of care (inpatient or emergency services) for the standardized virtual patient (odds ratio52.67, 95{\%} confidence interval51.67-4.25), even after adjustment for other factors. Virtual actions taken, such as contracting with the patient for safety and discussing hospitalization, elucidated these training differences. Conclusions: Training backgrounds were important determinants of clinicians' actions and the dispositions they recommended for a psychiatric patient at high risk of self-harm and harm to others in the educational setting and may suggest the need for further training to standardize and optimize care.",
author = "Tristan Gorrindo and Elizabeth Goldfarb and Lydia Chevalier and Hoeppner, {Bettina B.} and Birnbaum, {Robert J.} and Benjamin Meller and Alpert, {Jonathan E.} and John Herman and Weiss, {Anthony P.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ps.201200461",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "808--811",
journal = "Psychiatric Services",
issn = "1075-2730",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interprofessional differences in disposition decisions

T2 - Results from a standardized web-based patient assessment

AU - Gorrindo, Tristan

AU - Goldfarb, Elizabeth

AU - Chevalier, Lydia

AU - Hoeppner, Bettina B.

AU - Birnbaum, Robert J.

AU - Meller, Benjamin

AU - Alpert, Jonathan E.

AU - Herman, John

AU - Weiss, Anthony P.

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - Objective: This study examined differences in disposition decisions among mental health professionals using a standardized Web-based simulation. Methods: Using a Webbased simulation that described, across users, the same complex psychiatric patient, credentialed clinicians in a psychiatry department conducted a violence risk assessment and selected a level of followup care. Results: Of 410 clinicians who completed the simulation, 60% of psychiatrists were more likely than other types of clinicians to select higher levels of care (inpatient or emergency services) for the standardized virtual patient (odds ratio52.67, 95% confidence interval51.67-4.25), even after adjustment for other factors. Virtual actions taken, such as contracting with the patient for safety and discussing hospitalization, elucidated these training differences. Conclusions: Training backgrounds were important determinants of clinicians' actions and the dispositions they recommended for a psychiatric patient at high risk of self-harm and harm to others in the educational setting and may suggest the need for further training to standardize and optimize care.

AB - Objective: This study examined differences in disposition decisions among mental health professionals using a standardized Web-based simulation. Methods: Using a Webbased simulation that described, across users, the same complex psychiatric patient, credentialed clinicians in a psychiatry department conducted a violence risk assessment and selected a level of followup care. Results: Of 410 clinicians who completed the simulation, 60% of psychiatrists were more likely than other types of clinicians to select higher levels of care (inpatient or emergency services) for the standardized virtual patient (odds ratio52.67, 95% confidence interval51.67-4.25), even after adjustment for other factors. Virtual actions taken, such as contracting with the patient for safety and discussing hospitalization, elucidated these training differences. Conclusions: Training backgrounds were important determinants of clinicians' actions and the dispositions they recommended for a psychiatric patient at high risk of self-harm and harm to others in the educational setting and may suggest the need for further training to standardize and optimize care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883145283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883145283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.201200461

DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.201200461

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 808

EP - 811

JO - Psychiatric Services

JF - Psychiatric Services

SN - 1075-2730

IS - 8

ER -